Chelsea Den Hollander

Mrs. Chelsea Den Hollander


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
27 July 2015 in Journal of Fungi
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CHChelsea Den Hollander
Chelsea Den Hollander
JVJasper Visser
Jasper Visser
EHEllen De Haas
Ellen De Haas
Luca IncrocciLuca Incrocci
Luca Incrocci
TSThrees Smijs
Threes Smijs
Onychomycosis is predominantly caused by the dermatophytes Trichophyton rubrum, Trichophyton mentagrophytes and Trichophyton tonsurans. The main treatment obstacle concerns low nail-plate drug permeability. In vitro antifungal photodynamic treatment (PDT) and nail penetration enhancing effectiveness have been proven for multifunctional photosensitizer 5,10,15-tris(4-N-methylpyridinium)-20-(4-(butyramido-methylcysteinyl)-hydroxyphenyl)-[21H,23H]-porphine trichloride (PORTHE). This study investigates single PORTHE green laser/LED PDT of varying degrees of ex vivo onychomycoses in a human nail model. T. mentagrophytes, T. rubrum, T. tonsurans onychomycoses were ex vivo induced on nail pieces at 28 °C (normal air) and 37 °C (6.4% CO2) during 3 to 35 days and PDTs applied to the 37 °C infections. All dermatophytes showed increasingly nail plate invasion at 37 °C between 7 and 35 days; arthroconidia were observed after 35 days for T. mentagrophytes and T. tonsurans. Using 81 J/cm2 (532 nm) 7-day T. mentagrophytes onychomycoses were cured (92%) with 80 µM PORTHE (pH 8) after 24 h propylene glycol (PG, 40%) pre-treatment and 35-day onychomycoses (52%–67%) with 24 h PORTHE (40–80 µM)/40% PG treatment (pH 5). 28 J/cm2 LED light (525 ± 37 nm) improved cure rates to 72%, 83% and 73% for, respectively, T. mentagrophytus, T. rubrum and T. tonsurans 35-day onychomycoses and to 100% after double PDT. Data indicate PDT relevance for onychomycosis.

14 December 2024 in Pharmaceuticals
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Ioannis NtafoulisIoannis Ntafoulis
Ioannis Ntafoulis
SKStijn L. W. Koolen
Stijn L. W. Koolen
OTOlaf van Tellingen
Olaf van Tellingen
CHChelsea Den Hollander
Chelsea Den Hollander
HSHendriks Sabel-Goedknegt
Hendriks Sabel-Goedknegt
Martine LamfersMartine Lamfers
Martine Lamfers
Background: Glioblastoma is an aggressive and incurable type of brain cancer. Little progress has been made in the development of effective new therapies in the past decades. The blood–brain barrier (BBB) and drug efflux pumps, which together hamper drug delivery to these tumors, play a pivotal role in the gap between promising preclinical findings and failure in clinical trials. Therefore, selecting drugs that can reach the tumor region in pharmacologically effective concentrations is of major importance. Methods: In the current study, we utilized a drug selection platform to identify candidate drugs by combining in vitro oncological drug screening data and pharmacokinetic (PK) profiles for central nervous system (CNS) penetration using the multiparameter optimization (MPO) score. Furthermore, we developed intracranial patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models that recapitulated the in situ characteristics of glioblastoma and characterized them in terms of vascular integrity, BBB permeability and expression of ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters. Omacetaxine mepesuccinate (OMA) was selected as a proof-of-concept drug candidate to validate our drug selection pipeline. Results: We assessed OMA’s PK profile in three different orthotopic mouse PDX models and found that OMA reaches the brain tumor tissue at concentrations ranging from 2- to 11-fold higher than in vitro IC50 values on patient-derived glioblastoma cell cultures. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that OMA, a drug selected for its in vitro anti-glioma activity and CNS- MPO score, achieves brain tumor tissue concentrations exceeding its in vitro IC50 values in patient-derived glioblastoma cell cultures, as shown in three orthotopic mouse PDX models. We emphasize the importance of such approaches at the preclinical level, highlighting both their significance and limitations in identifying compounds with potential clinical implementation in glioblastoma.