(1) Background: Currently, an increasing number of women postpone pregnancy beyond the age of 35. Gynecological cancers affect a significant proportion of women of reproductive age, necessitating the development of fertility preservation methods to fulfill family planning. Consequently, providing treatment options that preserve fertility in women diagnosed with gynecological cancers has become a crucial component of care for survivors. (2) Methods: We conducted an extensive search of relevant scientific publications in PubMed and Embase databases and performed a narrative review, including high-quality peer-reviewed research on fertility after being treated for gynecologic cancers, reporting pregnancy rates, birth rates, and pregnancy outcomes in cancer survivors as well as therapeutic options which partially preserve fertility and methods for obtaining a pregnancy in survivors. (3) Discussion: The medicine practiced today is focused on both treating the neoplasm and preserving the quality of life of the patients, with fertility preservation being an important element of this quality. This leads to an improved quality of life, allowing these women to become mothers even in the seemingly adverse circumstances posed by such a pathology. However, although there are guidelines on female fertility preservation in the context of neoplasms, an analysis shows that physicians do not routinely consider it and do not discuss these options with their patients. (4) Conclusions: Advancements in medicine have led to a better understanding and management of gynecological neoplasms, resulting in increased survival rates. Once the battle against these neoplasms is won, the issue of preserving the quality of life for these women arises, with fertility preservation being an important aspect for women who have not yet fulfilled their family planning desires at the time of diagnosis. It is important for patients to be informed about the available options for fertility preservation and to be encouraged to make informed decisions in collaboration with their medical team. Standardized recommendations for onco-fertility into guidelines should be taken into consideration in the future.

Research on late preterm infants is limited compared with extremely low birth weight infants, despite their vulnerability to brain injury. Early intervention is crucial, as these infants often face higher risks of cerebral palsy and developmental delays. This review examines methods to predict neurological outcomes and evaluates standard care protocols for neurologically affected late preterm infants. It also explores the potential for developing a comprehensive care bundle that integrates family involvement and delineates the responsibilities for continuous developmental monitoring. A total of 21 studies, primarily cohort studies, were included. This review synthesizes recent research on neurological development in late preterm infants, highlighting key markers and methods to improve neurological monitoring and long-term outcomes. Late preterm infants are at an increased risk for neurodevelopmental impairments, such as cerebral palsy and cognitive delays, particularly when growth restrictions or low birth weight are present. Early interventions, including specialized neurological assessments and targeted rehabilitation, show potential for improving these outcomes. Late preterm infants face increased neurodevelopmental risks despite low perinatal mortality. Early identification, standardized assessments, and targeted follow-up are essential. Emerging interventions show promise, but further research and equitable care access are needed to improve long-term outcomes.

Background: Cesarean deliveries have increased in recent years worldwide. This increase translates into an escalation of obstetrical complications that could lead to permanent injuries. Comprehensive knowledge of the risk factors for uterine scar defects and their probability factor could guide gynecologists towards decreasing the percentage of scar defects and reducing the morbidity produced by a scarred uterus. Methods: A review of the literature published in the last 10 years produced a number of 80,085 articles, from which we screened 147 articles and selected 11 recently published papers, attempting to rank the most frequently described risk factors in terms of probability. A total number of 11,349 patients who underwent CS were included from the 11 studies. Results: Cesarean scar defects developed in 19.42% of cases; our results showed that the highest probability was given by single-layer suture, with gestational diabetes being the main patient-related risk factor for scar defects. A definitive ranking of the risks is difficult to assess, because different studies focus on certain risks and most of the relevant data are missing or are omitted. Conclusions: In this study, we investigate the most common risk factors that give rise to the development of cesarian scar defects, conducting a ranking of these risks from the most probable to the least important, in order to facilitate informed decision making for providers.

Lynch syndrome, one of the most common genetic syndromes predisposing to cancer, is associated with a series of malignant conditions, among which the most frequent is colorectal cancer, but gynecologic cancers (especially endometrial) are also quite common. Despite the significant progress made in understanding this condition over time, there are still aspects in managing this condition that have not demonstrated clear benefits. This article aims to summarize the recommendations of international societies and present the latest developments in managing Lynch syndrome, focusing on gynecologic cancer screening and possible prevention strategies. Advances in genetic testing procedures and discoveries related to the association between oncological pathology frequency and the affected pathogenic variant type will probably lead to personalized medicine focused on the individual patient in the coming years. Although various screening methods for gynecological cancers in patients with Lynch syndrome have been used over time, they have not shown significant survival benefits. This highlights the need for studying and implementing new screening and diagnostic methods, which have been under investigation in recent years and are mentioned in this article.

Ovarian cancer is a highly aggressive disease with a poor prognosis, largely due to challenges in early detection. Traditional screening methods, including transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and CA125 testing, have notable limitations in detecting early-stage disease and are not advised for widespread use. This article examines emerging early detection technologies, such as novel biomarkers, circulating DNA, PCR assays from Pap swabs, autoantibodies, microRNAs, and advanced imaging techniques. Future advancements in therapeutic methods may enhance survival outcomes linked to early detection. While general population screening remains unendorsed, targeted screening might be valuable for high-risk groups, such as those with Lynch syndrome, but should not replace risk-reducing surgeries. Developing comprehensive screening guidelines for high-risk individuals is essential for improving early detection and survival rates in ovarian cancer.

Background and objectives. In colorectal cancers, the embryologic origin of the primary tumor determines important molecular dissimilarities between right-sided (RS) and left-sided (LS) carcinomas. Although important prognostic differences have been revealed between RS- and LS-patients with resected colorectal liver metastases (CLMs), it is still unclear if this observation depends on the RAS mutational status. To refine the impact of primary tumor location (PTL) on the long-term outcomes of patients with resected CLMs, the rates of overall survival (OS), relapse-free survival (RFS) and survival after recurrence (SAR) were compared between RS- vs. LS-patients, according to their RAS status. Material and Methods. All patients with known RAS status, operated until December 2019, were selected from a prospectively maintained database, including all patients who underwent hepatectomy for histologically-proven CLMs. A log-rank test was used to compare survival rates between the RS- vs. LS-group, in RAS-mut and RAS-wt patients, respectively. A multivariate analysis was performed to assess if PTL was independently associated with OS, RFS or SAR. Results. In 53 patients with RAS-mut CLMs, the OS, RFS and SAR rates were not significantly different (p = 0.753, 0.945 and 0.973, respectively) between the RS and LS group. In 89 patients with RAS-wt CLMs, the OS and SAR rates were significantly higher (p = 0.007 and 0.001, respectively) in the LS group vs. RS group, while RFS rates were similar (p = 0.438). The multivariate analysis performed in RAS-wt patients revealed that RS primary (p = 0.009), extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.001), N-positive (p = 0.014), age higher than 65 (p = 0.002) and preoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.004) were independently associated with worse OS, while RS location (p < 0.001) and N-positive (p = 0.007) were independent prognostic factors for poor SAR. Conclusions. After resection of CLMs, PTL had no impact on long-term outcomes in RAS-mut patients, while in RAS-wt patients, the RS primary was independently associated with worse OS and SAR.