Fabio Verneau

Prof. Fabio Verneau

Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2016 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FVFabio Verneau
Fabio Verneau
FBFrancesco La Barbera
Francesco La Barbera
SKSusanne Kolle
Susanne Kolle
Mario AmatoMario Amato
Mario Amato
TGTeresa Del Giudice
Teresa Del Giudice
KGKlaus G Grunert
Klaus G Grunert

1 February 2014 in Appetite
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FVFabio Verneau
Fabio Verneau
FCFrancesco Caracciolo
Francesco Caracciolo
ACAdele Coppola
Adele Coppola
PLPasquale Lombardi
Pasquale Lombardi


7 March 2016 in British Food Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VSValeria Sodano
Valeria Sodano
MGMaria Teresa Gorgitano
Maria Teresa Gorgitano
FVFabio Verneau
Fabio Verneau
CVCosimo Damiano Vitale
Cosimo Damiano Vitale
Purpose: – The purpose of this paper is to investigate attitudes of Italian consumers towards a set of applications of nanotechnology in the food domain. The chief goal is to identify the main factors influencing the willingness to buy nanofoods (WTBN), distinguishing between factors related to the products, in terms of perceived risks and benefits and psychological factors. Design/methodology/approach: – A questionnaire was administered to a sample of about 300 people to gather information about the willingness to buy six nanofoods (namely: creamier ice cream with the same fat content; salt and sugar that do not form lumps with moisture; fruit juices enriched with bioactive molecules; bread enriched with Omega-3; plastic bottles for beer; antimicrobial food packaging for meat) and psychological characteristics, measured by several attitudinal scales. In order to study the influence of the attitudinal factors on the WTBN a simultaneous equations model was estimated, defining both its structural and reduced form. Findings: – Respondents show a certain reluctance to buy foods produced using nanotechnologies The estimates of the econometric model indicate that WTBN is affected by the risks and benefits perceived with respect to the six nanofoods under consideration; the level of neophobia, as captured through the food technology neophobia scale; and the level of trust in food industry. Originality/value: – The study extends the literature on nanofood consumer acceptance by adding useful evidence from the Italian case, which has not yet been studied.

1 October 2015 in Food Quality and Preference
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ALAlessia Lombardi
Alessia Lombardi
GMGiuseppina Migliore
Giuseppina Migliore
FVFabio Verneau
Fabio Verneau
Giorgio SchifaniGiorgio Schifani
Giorgio Schifani
Luigi CembaloLuigi Cembalo
Luigi Cembalo

16 June 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
ACAdele Coppola
Adele Coppola
ASAlfonso Scardera
Alfonso Scardera
Mario AmatoMario Amato
Mario Amato
FVFabio Verneau
Fabio Verneau
In the European Union legislative proposals for the next Common Agricultural Policy (CAP) the income support remains an essential part of the CAP. This paper analyses agricultural income levels, the role of EU aids in ensuring fair levels of income and how different socio-economic and structural characteristics affect farms’ economic viability. Italian Farm Accountancy Data Network (FADN) data have been processed and economic viability has been assessed by comparing Farm Net Income to a reference income and by estimating a profitability index to check whether the agricultural activities remunerate factors owned by the farmer and his/her family. After an explorative analysis, two multinomial logit models have been estimated to evaluate how structural and socio-economic characteristics affect the likelihood of a farm to be viable with and without EU aids. Both structural farm characteristics and farmer’s production strategies explain the likelihood of a farm to be viable in the short and in the medium-long term. Farms are more likely to be viable as the size increases and the higher the capital intensity, while viability likelihood decreases with the farmer’s age, when the holder is a woman, and the farm is localized in Southern Italy. CAP payments do not modify the factors that affect farm viability but can change their weight.