Density‐driven dissolution of carbon dioxide in water is a well‐known and much described mechanism in geological sequestration of this greenhouse gas. It is remarkable that such enhanced dissolution does not receive attention in karst hydrology and speleology. Models and hypotheses on karst development are complex and consider many different processes. We focus here on the influence of CO₂ partial gas pressures at the interface between atmosphere and karst water on the dynamics of dissolved CO₂ concentrations below the water table. Seasonal variations of microbial soil activity and root respiration or barometric‐pressure changes cause fluctuations in CO₂ partial pressures. Dependent on the existence and strength of a karst‐water background flow, fingering regimes might be triggered causing enhanced dissolution of CO₂. This allows replenishment of CO₂, and, thus, dissolutional power even deep in the water body without the need for percolating water to transport dissolved CO₂. We present and discuss simplified and generic experimental and computational scenarios to strengthen our claim, and we try to give answers to: how much? and under which circumstances? The applied numerical model solves the Navier‐Stokes equation with water density dependent on CO₂ concentration and temperature. We show that calculated CO₂ mass fluxes into the water bodies are dependent on the ratio of Péclet to Rayleigh numbers (Pe/Ra) and show a local minimum around Pe/Ra = 1, i.e. when natural and forced convection are about equal. Concluding, we claim that there is sufficient reason to consider density‐driven dissolution as a process of relevance in karstification if circumstances are given.

The new in situ geodynamic laboratory established in the framework of the ICDP Eger project aims to develop the most modern, comprehensive, multiparameter laboratory at depth for studying earthquake swarms, crustal fluid flow, mantle-derived CO₂ and helium degassing, and processes of the deep biosphere. In order to reach a new level of high-frequency, near-source and multiparameter observation of earthquake swarms and related phenomena, such a laboratory comprises a set of shallow boreholes with high-frequency 3-D seismic arrays as well as modern continuous real-time fluid monitoring at depth and the study of the deep biosphere. This laboratory is located in the western part of the Eger Rift at the border of the Czech Republic and Germany (in the West Bohemia–Vogtland geodynamic region) and comprises a set of five boreholes around the seismoactive zone. To date, all monitoring boreholes have been drilled. This includes the seismic monitoring boreholes S1, S2 and S3 in the crystalline units north and east of the major Nový Kostel seismogenic zone, borehole F3 in the Hartoušov mofette field and borehole S4 in the newly discovered Bažina maar near Libá. Supplementary borehole P1 is being prepared in the Neualbenreuth maar for paleoclimate and biological research. At each of these sites, a borehole broadband seismometer will be installed, and sites S1, S2 and S3 will also host a 3-D seismic array composed of a vertical geophone chain and surface seismic array. Seismic instrumenting has been completed in the S1 borehole and is in preparation in the remaining four monitoring boreholes. The continuous fluid monitoring site of Hartoušov includes three boreholes, F1, F2 and F3, and a pilot monitoring phase is underway. The laboratory also enables one to analyze microbial activity at CO₂ mofettes and maar structures in the context of changes in habitats. The drillings into the maar volcanoes contribute to a better understanding of the Quaternary paleoclimate and volcanic activity.

Subsurface geologic storage of carbon dioxide calls for sophisticated monitoring tools with respect to long-term safety and environmental impact issues. Despite extensive research, many factors governing the fate of injected carbon dioxide (CO2) remain unclear. To identify possible risks through leakage of the CO2 storage reservoir, a program for monitoring of the CO2 flux at the surface was started at the Ketzin test site, which allows to distinguish between natural temporal and spatial flux variations and a potential leakage. To gain adequate long-term baseline data on the local background CO2 flux variations, CO2 soil gas flux, soil moisture, and temperature measurements were conducted once a month during a 6-yr period. Furthermore, soil samples were analyzed for their organic carbon and total nitrogen contents. The mean flux of all sampling sites before the CO2 injection (2005–2007) was 2.8 μmol m−2 s−1 (ranging from 2.4 to 3.5), with a Q10 factor of 2.4, and in the years after commencing injection (2009–2010), 2.4 μmol m−2 s−1 (ranging from 2.2 to 2.5), with the same Q10 factor. The CO2 flux rate is mainly controlled by the soil temperature. A significant influence of diurnal temperature variation and soil moisture was not detected. The spatial variability of the CO2 flux among the 20 sampling locations ranges from 1.0 to 4.5 μmol m−2 s−1, depending on the organic carbon and total nitrogen content of the soil. Through comparison with the long-term measurements, unusual high CO2 fluxes can theoretically be distinguished from natural variations.