Background Zinc is an essential nutrient that is naturally available in most foods. Deficiency of this micronutrient in particular can cause a number of health complications. Zinc deficiency during infancy is more troublesome as rapid growth and nutrient relied development takes place in this period. Most severe outcomes of zinc deficiency during infancy are considered to be, impaired immunity, growth retardation and impaired neurodevelopment. The aim of this pragmatic study is to determine whether zinc supplementation strategy is feasible and effective for reducing growth retardation at national level. Methods A randomized, multicenter, double-blind, parallel group effectiveness trial that evaluated the effect of zinc supplementation in infant development. Children aged 6–24 months were recruited from healthcare centers of Damavand, Pishva and Varamin in the beginning of the study (n = 682). The Subjects were then randomly allocated in two groups of intervention (n = 272), and control (n = 308), where a daily dose of zinc sulfate (5ml) suspension containing 5mg elemental zinc and placebo were administered for the period of 6 month. Investigators, care givers and the parents of the children were blinded to the nature of the intervention. Anthropometric measures were evaluated at the beginning and after the six month intervention period. The primary outcome measured was linear growth and length difference, serum zinc and ferritin concentrations were the secondary outcomes. Findings Following the intervention, compared with the placebo, zinc supplementation was associated with significant difference in the average length increment (primary outcome) (placebo 5·23 ± 2·19 vs. intervention 5·79 ± 2·18 cm, p = 0·02). No significant difference was observed in concentrations of serum zinc and ferritin. After the intervention the prevalence of zinc deficiency was significantly lower in the intervention group compared to the placebo group. No complications and adverse effects were reported and the compliance was very good (7 children out of 344 didn't comply with the intake of syrup). Interpretation Zinc supplementation for six month among children (6–24 months) had beneficial outcomes on growth and average length increment, therefore we propose it is a feasible strategy for preventing growth retardation.

Background: The association between vitamin D status and inflammatory biomarkers and lipid profile is not well known, especially in adolescents. Therefore, the aim of the current study is to investigate the association of vitamin D status with serum lipids and inflammatory biomarkers, including IL-10, IL-6, hsCRP, and TNFR-2, in male adolescents. Methods and materials: A sample of seventy-one high school male students, aged 17 years old, from a high school in Tehran were enrolled in the study. They were divided into four groups including group with serum vitamin D below 25 (ng/mL) (SVD < 25; n = 36), 25 and above (ng/mL) (SVD ≥ 25; n = 35), negative-hsCRP (n = 48), and positive-hsCRP (n = 23). Weight, height, body mass index, dietary intake, serum lipids, and inflammatory biomarkers, including IL-10, IL-6, hsCRP, and TNFR-2, were measured. Results: In the (SVD < 25) group, the serum level of TNFR-2 was significantly higher compared to that in the (SVD ≥ 25) group. There was a significant negative association between serum TNFR-2 and vitamin D levels in the whole sample. We found significant lower levels of IL-10 in positive-hsCRP group compared to the negative-hsCRP group. In addition, there was a significant negative correlation between the serum vitamin D level and hsCRP in both hsCRP groups. The HDL level was lower in the (SVD < 25) group compared to that in the (SVD ≥ 25) group. Finally, there was a negative correlation between the serum HDL and hsCRP levels in the positive-hsCRP subjects. Conclusion: Based on the findings it can be concluded that serum vitamin D affects HDL and inflammation status. Although serum levels of HDL and inflammation status are both predictors of metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular disease, further studies are needed to prove it, especially in adolescents.

The aim of this study was to assess knowledge, attitude and practice of urban and rural households toward principles of nutrition in Iran. The study popula

The aim of this study is to determine knowledge, attitude and practice of Iranian households and health staff on nutrition at province level. The sampling method in NUTRIKAP survey for households in each province is single-stage cluster sampling and the size of clusters is equal. The sampling method for health staff in each province is stratified random sampling. Samples are selected from physicians, health experts, health technicians, nutritionists and health assistants (Behvarz). Overall, 14136 people in 57 clusters in each province and 480 health staff over the country participate in this survey. The necessary data will be gathered by the structured questionnaire and the interview with the eligible person in each household. Data gathering from health staff will be carried out by self-administered questionnaire. The results of this study can help the bureau of community nutrition to provide the proper interventions to improve nutritional health of households.

Background Iodine deficiency and related disorders were very common in Iran prior to 1996, when universal salt iodization (USI) was implemented and in 2000 Iran was declared iodine deficiency disorders (IDD) free. The aim of this study was to evaluate the adequacy of iodine intake by Iranian households in all 30 provinces of Iran, a quarter of a century after the intervention. Methods A total of 18,000 school-aged children (8–10 years with mean 8.7 ± 1 year) were included in this study. Urine samples were collected from all children for measurement of urinary iodine excretion and 1800, 210 and 3000 salt samples were randomly collected from the family kitchen, production site of 73 salt factories and distribution circles of 30 provinces, respectively. Results The median urinary iodine concentration (UIC) of participants was 161 μg/L. The proportion of children with UIC of, 20–49, 50–99 and ≥ 100 μg/L were 10.3, 15.9 and 73.7%, respectively. The mean (± SD) and median salt iodine values were 28.2 (± 12.6) and 31.7 ppm, at the production site, and 31.5 (± 13.6) and 29.6 ppm at the distribution circles, respectively. About 80% of factory salts had more than 20 ppm iodine. 98% of households consumed iodized salt, 80% had appropriate salt storage, and 83% of the household salts contained ≥ 20 ppm. Conclusions Based on the results of this study, Iranian populations are consuming adequate iodine. The well-maintained and monitored USI program has improved the dietary iodine intakes of the population, and the country has achieved all criteria of a well-controlled IDD program.