This study proposes a novel two-phase model framework for designing sustainable biomass supply chains of Community-Scale Biomass Power Plants (CSBPPs) by optimization based on geospatial-based Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM), the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method and the Location–Allocation Model. Phase I involved land suitability criteria prioritization and suitable land area analysis. The location–allocation model was the main tool used in Phase II to identify optimal locations, followed by the analysis of the levelized cost of electricity (LCOE). The model optimized site location based on the availability (remaining) of local crop residues, electricity demand, road networks and other key criteria for power plant development, such as the location of substations and the location of existing power plants. The results show that the estimated total remaining crop residue potential in the EEC region was 2403 kt/year, which can generate approximately 34,156 TJ. The location–allocation model identified the top five locations for CSBPPs. The total required installed capacity of these five locations was approximately 100.23 MW in order to serve the district energy demand by the residential sector of 793.82 million (kWh/year). Assuming direct combustion-steam turbine technology with an installed capacity of 6–10 MW, the average LCOE was found to be in a range of $0.076 to $0.081 USD/kWh.

Community-scale biomass power plants (CSBPPs) offer a decentralized approach for electricity generation by utilizing locally available biomass while delivering socioeconomic benefits. Site selection plays a critical role in the success of CSBPPs and requires the consideration of diverse spatial and non-spatial factors. This study presents a spatial decision-support tool for identifying suitable CSBPP sites in Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), which comprises the Chachoengsao, Chonburi, and Rayong provinces. A geoprocessing workflow integrating Geographic Information Systems (GISs), Multi-Criteria Decision-Making (MCDM), and the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was developed using ModelBuilder tools in ArcGIS Pro (version 3.0.2). Thirteen sub-criteria related to geographical, infrastructural, and socioeconomic–cultural dimensions, along with exclusion zones, were evaluated by 15 experts from diverse stakeholder groups. Biomass availability from five major economic crops was combined with other spatial data layers, incorporating expert-assigned weights and suitability scores. The findings indicated a remaining biomass energy potential was 34,156 TJ, with sugarcane residues contributing over 80%. Approximately 20% of the EEC area (about 0.262 million hectares) was classified as highly suitable for CSBPP development, revealing several viable site options. The proposed model offers a flexible and replicable framework for regional biomass planning and can be adapted to other locations by adjusting the criteria and integrating optimization techniques.

Accurate, high-resolution emission inventories are essential for air quality modeling and policy evaluation, yet national-scale inventories for Thailand remain limited in spatial and temporal detail. This study develops a comprehensive national emission inventory for Thailand in 2019 (EI–TH 2019), covering 12 major air pollutants and greenhouse gases across key sectors, including energy, transport, industry, agriculture, waste, and residential activities. The inventory is constructed using country-specific activity data from official statistics and sectoral surveys, combined with GAINS-consistent emission factors and control assumptions. Emissions are resolved at 1 × 1 km spatial resolution and monthly temporal resolution to capture Thailand-specific emission dynamics. The results show that emissions across major pollutants are dominated by a limited number of source groups, with biomass burning and residential solid-fuel use driving particulate matter, transport dominating NO_x and CO emissions, large-scale combustion and industry controlling SO₂ emissions, and agriculture contributing the majority of NH₃ emissions. Strong seasonal variability is observed in PM_2.5, CO, and NH₃, primarily driven by dry-season biomass burning, whereas NO_x and SO₂ exhibit relatively stable temporal patterns. The reliability of EI–TH 2019 is supported by a multi-dimensional evaluation framework. Temporal consistency is demonstrated through strong agreement between modeled PM_2.5 emissions and ground-based observations, as well as between NO_x emissions and satellite-derived TROPOMI NO₂ (r = 0.93; ρ = 0.96). Biomass burning timing is further validated using satellite fire activity (VIIRS), showing consistent seasonal patterns. Comparisons with global inventories (EDGAR v8.1, HTAP v3.2, and GFED5.1) reveal systematic differences in sectoral contributions, temporal profiles, and emission magnitudes, particularly for biomass burning, reflecting the importance of country-specific data and assumptions. Overall, EI–TH 2019 provides a robust, high-resolution, and policy-relevant emission dataset that improves the representation of emission processes in Thailand. The results highlight key priority sectors—biomass burning, transport, industry, and agriculture—for targeted emission-reduction strategies and support applications in chemical transport modeling, exposure assessment, and integrated air-quality and climate-policy analysis.