Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a benign disease characterized by a chronic relapsing and remitting inflammation of the colon-rectum. Medical treatment, including corticosteroids, antibiotics, immunomodulators, 5-aminosalicylate and biological agents, is the first line approach. Because of steroid-dependence, therapy refractory disease, unacceptable medical side-effects, suspect of malignant degeneration and non-compliant behavior, up to 35% of patients need surgical treatment [ 1 x [1] Filippi, J., Allen, P.B., Hebuterne, X., and Peyrin-Biroulet, L. Does anti-TNF therapy reduce the requirement for surgery in ulcerative colitis? a systematic review. Curr. Drug Targets. 2011; 12: 1440–1447 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (44) | Google Scholar See all References , 2 x [2] Targownik, L.E., Singh, H., Nugent, Z., and Bernstein, C.N. The epidemiology of colectomy in ulcerative colitis: results from a population-based cohort. Am. J. Gastroenterol. 2012; 107: 1228–1235 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (103) | Google Scholar See all References ]. A total (procto)colectomy is often required and this procedure is defined as standard in the last European Crohn's and Colitis Organization (ECCO) and American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS) guidelines [ 3 x [3] Travis, S.P., Stange, E.F., Lémann, M., Oresland, T., Bemelman, W.A., Chowers, Y., Colombel, J.F., D'Haens, G., Ghosh, S., Marteau, P., Kruis, W., Mortensen, N.J., Penninckx, F., and Gassull, M. European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO), European evidence-based consensus on the management of ulcerative colitis: current management. J. Crohns Colitis. 2008; 2: 24–62 Abstract | Full Text | Full Text PDF | PubMed | Scopus (460) | Google Scholar See all References , 4 x [4] Cohen, J.L., Strong, S.A., Hyman, N.H., Buie, W.D., Dunn, G.D., Ko, C.Y., Fleshner, P.R., Stahl, T.J., Kim, D.G., Bastawrous, A.L., Perry, W.B., Cataldo, P.A., Rafferty, J.F., Ellis, C.N., Rakinic, J., Gregorcyk, S., Shellito, P.C., Kilkenny, J.W., Ternent, C.A., Koltun, W., Tjandra, J.J., Orsay, C.P., Whiteford, M.H., and Penzer, J.R. Standards practice task force American society of colon and rectal surgeons, practical parameters for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. Dis. Colon Rectum. 2005; 48: 1997–2009 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (87) | Google Scholar See all References ]. Total proctocolectomy can be performed by open or minimally-invasive approach. The surgical technique does not require an oncological resection, such as mesenteric excision, radical lymphadenectomy and ligation of the vessels near their origin. This allows a close to the bowel dissection and it can be performed as a one-, two- or three-stage procedure. In the first case after colectomy, ileal-pouch anal anastomosis (IPAA) is performed. In the second approach, the IPAA is protected by a temporary diverting ileostomy. In the latter, colectomy with terminal ileostomy is performed, then the IPAA is carried out with diverting ileostomy and, finally, the intestinal transit is restored [ 5 x [5] McAllister, I., Sagar, P.M., Brayshaw, I., Gonsalves, S., and Williams, G.L. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy with and without previous subtotal colectomy. Colorectal Dis. 2009; 11: 296–301 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (21) | Google Scholar See all References , 6 x [6] Heuschen, U.A., Hinz, U., Allemeyer, E.H., Lucas, M., Heuschen, G., and Herfarth, C. One- or two-stage procedure for restorative proctocolectomy: rationale for a surgical strategy in ulcerative colitis. Ann. Surg. 2001; 234: 788–794 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (73) | Google Scholar See all References ]. Nowadays the minimally-invasive approach, like conventional laparoscopy or robotic surgery, can offer these patients better cosmesis, less post-operative pain and fewer complications, minimizing the trauma of surgery [ 7 x [7] Vitellaro, M., Bonfanti, G., Sala, P., Poiasina, E., Barisella, M., Signoroni, S., Mancini, A., and Bertario, L. Laparoscopic colectomy and restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis. Surg. Endosc. 2011; 25: 1866–1875 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (13) | Google Scholar See all References ] [7] . The robotic technique has been introduced to overtake the limitations of laparoscopy, especially in terms of dexterity, visualization and shorter learning curve [ 8 x [8] Mirnezami, A.H., Mirnezami, R., Venkatasubramaniam, A.K., Chandrakumaran, K., Cecil, T.D., and Moran, B.J. Robotic colorectal surgery: hype or new hope? a systematic review of robotics in colorectal surgery. Colorectal Dis. 2010; 12: 1084–1093 Crossref | PubMed | Google Scholar See all References ] [8] . In effect, robotics has the potential to provide an enhanced and clear view even within a narrow pelvis, with improved visualization of the nerves and their branches and a better manipulation in a field difficult to access in laparoscopy [ 9 x [9] Aly, E.H. Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence. Int. J. Colorectal Dis. 2014; 29: 1–8 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (36) | Google Scholar See all References ] [9] . Moreover the learning curve of the robotic technique seems to be faster than laparoscopic surgery, probably because robotic assistance improves performance with complex tasks, while decreasing operator workload [ 10 x [10] Melich, G., Hong, Y.K., Kim, J., Hur, H., Baik, S.H., Kim, N.K., Sender Liberman, A., and Min, B.S. Simultaneous development of laparoscopy and robotics provides acceptable perioperative outcomes and shows robotics to have a faster learning curve and to be overall faster in rectal cancer surgery: analysis of novice MIS surgeon learning curves. Surg. Endosc. 2015; 29: 558–568 Crossref | PubMed | Scopus (21) | Google Scholar See all References ] [10] . Finally, several reports have demonstrated the non inferiority of robotics compared to laparoscopy, in terms of short and long-term outcomes [ 11 x [11] Buchs, N.C. Robotic...