Yiying Zhu

Dr. Yiying Zhu

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
30 July 2021 in Modelling and Simulation in Materials Science and Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LWLingkang Wu
Lingkang Wu
YZYiying Zhu
Yiying Zhu
HWHao Wang
Hao Wang
Mo LiMo Li
Mo Li
As a sequel to the previous paper on the calculation of the crystal–melt interface free energy (2021 Materialia 15 100962), here we report the results on the kinetic coefficients using molecular dynamics simulations performed on six fcc metals and four bcc metals with the intention to compare the crystal structural influence. We found that the calculated kinetic coefficients are well described by the model by Broughton, Gilmer and Jackson (1982 Phys. Rev. Lett. 49 1496), and in particular, they exhibit varying degrees of anisotropy. We reveal that the anisotropies are related to the fluctuation of the crystal–melt interfaces, which causes the increase of the actual interface area in melting or solidification. The kinetic coefficients always display asymmetry between the solidification and melting process, and the difference is much more pronounced for the (111) interfaces in fcc metals which have the highest anisotropy. We found that the atomic mechanisms of the kinetic behaviors of these interfaces are closely related to the formation of twin-crystal domains during solidification, which delays the solidification process and consequently causes a decrease in the calculated kinetic coefficients.

1 March 2021 in Materialia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LWLingkang Wu
Lingkang Wu
HWHao Wang
Hao Wang
YZYiying Zhu
Yiying Zhu
MLMo Li
Mo Li

6 January 2025 in Applied Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJingyan Li
Jingyan Li
ZSZixian Song
Zixian Song
ZLZhichao Liu
Zhichao Liu
XXXianli Xie
Xianli Xie
PGPenghui Guan
Penghui Guan
YZYiying Zhu
Yiying Zhu
As the density of electronic packaging continues to rise, traditional soldering techniques encounter significant challenges, leading to copper–copper direct bonding as a new high-density connection method. The high melting point of copper presents difficulties for direct diffusion bonding under standard conditions, thus making low-temperature copper–copper bonding a focal point of research. In this study, we examine the sintering process at various temperatures by constructing models with multiple nanoparticles and sintering them under different conditions. Our findings indicate that 600 K is a crucial temperature for direct copper–copper sintering. Below this threshold, sintering predominantly depends on structural adjustments driven by residual stresses and particle contact. Conversely, at temperatures of 600 K and above, the activation of rapid surface atomic motion enables further structural adjustments between nanoparticles, leading to a marked decrease in porosity. Mechanical testing of the sintered samples corroborated the structural changes at different temperatures, demonstrating that the surface dynamic motion of atoms inherent in low-temperature sintering mechanisms significantly affects the mechanical properties of nanomaterials. These findings have important implications for developing high-performance materials that align with the evolving requirements of modern electronic devices.

1 March 2021 in AIP Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LWLingkang Wu
Lingkang Wu
YZYiying Zhu
Yiying Zhu
HWHao Wang
Hao Wang
Mo LiMo Li
Mo Li
While the crystal–melt interface kinetic equation predicts various kinetic behaviors, the realization of these scenarios and the corresponding thermodynamic conditions remain unclear. In this work, six representative interface kinetic behaviors of Fe were modeled and examined by molecular dynamics simulations. For the flat interface, several models were designed to study the migration, fluctuation, and recovery of the interface. For the cylindrical or curved interface, different models were also designed to test the equilibrium, migration, and instability of the interface. By comparing the kinetic behaviors of the two types of interfaces, we can observe the effect of interface curvature. During the simulations, two crucial material-specific parameters, the crystal–melt interface free energy and kinetic coefficient, were determined and compared among different models.

20 February 2023 in Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ZSZixian Song
Zixian Song
WLWei Luo
Wei Luo
YZYiying Zhu
Yiying Zhu

26 August 2024 in Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
YZYiying Zhu
Yiying Zhu
TSTengfei Shang
Tengfei Shang
JYJingyi Yuan
Jingyi Yuan
ZSZixian Song
Zixian Song
WLWei Luo
Wei Luo
MLMo Li
Mo Li