Background/Objectives: This study explores how narratives can act as therapeutic tools for Latin American immigrant women residing in the Region of Murcia, Spain. The objective is to analyse how the act of narrating their migratory experiences contributes to emotional relief, the re-signification of their trajectories, and the construction of resilience, while strengthening identity and fostering a sense of belonging in contexts marked by exclusion and inequalities in gender and class. Methods: A qualitative methodology was used with a narrative and gender approach. The field work was carried out between 2022 and 2023, with a sample of 20 women selected through snowball sampling. Data were collected through in-depth interviews and analysed through an inductive approach using MAXQDA 24.5 software. The emerging categories reflected the emotional experience and meanings constructed during the migration process. Results: The narratives revealed five key categories: emotional relief of social suffering through expression, reconstruction of identity and re-signification of experiences, emotional validation and strengthening of identity, empowerment and symbolic resistance, and sense of belonging and connection. Likewise, it was observed that the interviews created therapeutic spaces that strengthened the bond between researcher and participant. Conclusions: The narratives contribute to processing emotions and redefining traumatic experiences, while also allowing greater agency in the participating women. This approach highlights the transformative potential of narrative research to generate situated knowledge and promote inclusive practices in contexts of vulnerability.

Background/Objectives: The incorporation of peer support within mental health services has shown benefits for service users’ recovery and engagement, yet implementation is often hindered by role ambiguity and limited institutional recognition. The aim of this study is to explore the experiences of workers in a programme that provides peer support within a personal assistance model. The focus is on how they perceive the shaping of their professional role and their integration within care teams, rather than on evaluating service outcomes or effectiveness. Methods: An interpretive qualitative methodology with an exploratory approach was used. The study was conducted in a single organisational setting and focused on the self-reported experiences of personal assistants. Fieldwork was conducted in 2025 with ten personal assistants. Data were obtained through individual semi-structured interviews and one focus group with the same participants. A thematic content analysis combining inductive and deductive coding strategies was conducted using MAXQDA (version 24.11). Results: Findings indicate that the Personal Assistant role was perceived as reducing some of the ambiguity commonly associated with peer support, due to a clearer contractual framework and a more explicit delineation of functions. However, tensions persisted in relation to its hybrid professional identity, experiences of task overload, and ongoing gaps in coordination with traditional professional roles. Key facilitators included institutional support, accessible coordination, a supportive culture of care, and informal peer networks. Perceived benefits were reported for service users, including increased trust, hope, and autonomy, as well as for assistants, who described enhanced professional purpose and progress in their own recovery, alongside risks of emotional strain. Conclusions: Analysing the perspective of participants, the personal assistance model may represent a promising framework for the professionalisation of peer support through functional clarity, continuous supervision, and recognition of experiential knowledge. Further progress requires strengthening internal communication, expanding training opportunities, and enhancing the structural participation of personal assistants in decision-making. The study contributes an exploratory qualitative perspective to the growing literature on integrating lived-experience professionals into mental health services.

Background: The historical fracture between biomedical positivism and social constructivism has perpetuated an epistemic schizophrenia, reducing the human body either to a molecular machine (Körper) or to a discursive epiphenomenon, thus obscuring the structural roots of illness. This study establishes a rigorous metatheoretical framework to overcome this fragmentation. Methods: We employ a dialectical-transdisciplinary epistemological matrix—integrating Peircean abduction and negative dialectics as vectors of conceptual translation—to map the intersection between natural/medical sciences and social theories without falling into reductionisms. Results: The analysis demonstrates that health and illness constitute stratified complex wholes where structural violence and biological somatization (such as allostatic load) co-determine one another. Likewise, it deconstructs the technocratic neutrality of the medical model, proving that clinical practice must reintegrate the lived body (Leib). Conclusions: We propose an innovative paradigm—Transdisciplinary Enactive Realism—that bridges empirical evidence and hermeneutic meaning, providing a holistic, critical, and humanized foundation for contemporary sociosanitary ecosystems.