Rectal cancer is one of the most frequent malignancies worldwide. The most common histological type is adenocarcinoma, followed by mucinous adenocarcinoma. The outcome is less favorable for the mucinous type, yet the treatment course is the same. The aim of this systematic literature review is to assess existing information in order to improve survival in rectal mucinous adenocarcinoma (RMA) and establish a starting point for future research. A systematic search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science online libraries was performed in October 2024, evaluating studies regarding clinicopathological and genetic features in connection with targeted treatment and survival outcomes in RMA, using the terms “rectal cancer”, “rectum”, “mucinous adenocarcinoma”, or a combination of the terms. We selected 23 studies, 10 of them regarding the diagnostic implications and 13 discussing the treatment strategies and prognosis of this histological subtype. There were six studies addressing the imaging aspects, highlighting the distinct features of mucinous histology in MRI. The molecular specifics were detailed in four studies, outlining the molecular footprint. The prognosis and treatment course were addressed in 12 studies. The inflammation index prognosis, complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and surgical aspects were addressed individually in each study. We encapsulated the molecular and clinicopathological characteristics of RMA, as well as diagnostic and treatment approaches, to establish a baseline of references for the benefit of daily practice and further research.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), the most common primary liver malignancy, usually develops in patients with cirrhosis, yet the metabolic mechanisms that distinguish the two conditions remain poorly understood. This study aimed to explore metabolic dysregulations in HCC compared with cirrhosis and to identify potential biomarkers, especially lipids, with diagnostic and prognostic value. We prospectively studied 81 patients—41 with HCC and 40 with cirrhosis—using high-resolution UHPLC-QTOF-ESI⁺-MS to characterize their serum lipidome. Across both groups, 322 metabolites were identified, but their distribution was strikingly different. Patients with HCC showed higher levels of sphingolipids, glycerophospholipids, diglycerides, sterols, and certain fatty acids, reflecting tumor-related metabolic rewiring. In contrast, cirrhotic patients had increased D-glucose, 5-hydroxymethyluracil, lysophospholipids, acylcarnitines, and specific fatty acid derivatives. Several lipids, such as CerPE(d16:2/24:1(2OH)), SM(d18:0/14:0), PA(36:6), and GlcCer(d18:1/12:0), displayed excellent discriminative accuracy, highlighting their role as putative biomarkers. These findings underscore the importance of lipid metabolic reprogramming in HCC, characterized by membrane remodeling, energy adaptation, and oxidative stress resistance. Integrating lipidomic profiling into clinical practice could improve early detection and risk stratification in cirrhotic patients. Larger, multicenter studies are needed to validate these biomarkers and assess their therapeutic implications.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the predominant form of primary liver cancer and the third contributor to malignancy-related deaths worldwide. The hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), transient elastography-liver stiffness measurement (TE-LSM), and the association between TBS (tumor burden score), alpha-fetoprotein levels, and the Child–Pugh classification (TAC score) can serve as valuable prognostic indicators for these patients. Therefore, the main objective of our research was to analyze the prognostic value of the HVPG, TE-LSM, TBS, and TAC scores. An observational and survival study was conducted on 144 subjects. Our findings indicated that HVPG greater than 10 mmHg, AFP surpassing 400 ng/mL, an advanced C–P class, and low TAC score are independent predictors of overall survival. During the multivariate analysis, AFP serum levels and C–P class proved statistically significant. The present study revealed significant differences in overall survival between the two groups divided upon HVPG values and settled by the cutoff of 10 mmHg (p = 0.02). Moreover, by dividing the cohort into three groups based on the TAC score (very low, low, and moderate), statistically significant differences in overall survival were observed across the groups (p = 0.004).