Purpose To report technical success, safety profile and oncological results of balloon-occluded transcatheter arterial chemoembolization using a balloon micro-catheter and epirubicin-loaded polyethylene-glycol (PEG) microsphere (100 ± 25 µm and 200 ± 50 µm) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Materials and Methods This is a single-centre, single-arm, retrospective study with 6-month follow-up. Twenty-two patients (Child–Pugh A 68% [15/22], B in 32% [7/22]; age 67.05 ± 14 years) with 29 HCC were treated in 24 procedures. Technical success is defined: ability to place the balloon micro-catheter within the required vascular segment, balloon-occluded arterial stump pressure drops and assessment of microsphere deposition. Laboratory assessment pre/post-procedural and complications were analysed, respectively, according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAEv5) and CIRSE system. Postembolization syndrome (PES) was defined as fever and/or nausea and/or pain onset. Oncological results were evaluated using m-RECIST criteria with CT/MRI imaging at 1 and 3–6 months. In partial responder patients, pre/post-procedural tumour volume was compared. Results Pre-planned feeder was reached in all cases. Pressure drop average was 51.1 ± 21.6 mmHg. Exclusive target embolization was achieved in 14/24 procedures (58.3%). Laboratory test modifications were all grade 1. 4/24 adverse events occurred (17%): pseudo-aneurysm of the feeder (grade 3), liver abscess (grade 2) and 2 asymptomatic segmentary biliary tree dilatations (grade 2). PES occurred in 8/24 (33%). The complete response at 1 and 3–6 months was 44.8% (13/29) and 52.9% (9/17), respectively. The partial response at 1 and 3–6 months was 55% (16/29) and 4/17 (23.5%), respectively. Among partial responder patients, the average percentage of tumour volume reduction was 64.9 ± 27.3%. Conclusion Epirubicin-loaded PEG microsphere b-TACE is technically feasible, safe and effective procedure for HCC treatment.

Introduction: A type 2 endoleak (EL2) remains the most prevalent complication of endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) for an abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA). Methods: We conducted a retrospective, single-center analysis, including patients who underwent embolization for an isolated EL2 after EVAR. The study population was stratified into two groups: Group A, consisting of patients whose EL2 resolved after the first embolization procedure, and Group B, consisting of those with refractory EL2 (rEL2). The indication for EL2 treatment was aneurysmal sac growth amounting to >10 mm from the index EVAR. The indications for endograft explantation were the absence of high comorbidities and persisting aneurysmal sac expansion. Those with high comorbidities were subjected to another endovascular procedure or a conservative approach, the latter being preferred. The primary endpoint was EL2 resolution. The secondary endpoints were mid-term outcomes in terms of aneurysmal sac shrinkage, stability and expansion rates, and aneurysm-related complications. Results: Among 57 patients, 19 patients (33.3%) showed signs of EL2 after the first embolization, whereas 38 (66.6%) presented rEL2. Of these, 14 (36.8%) presented significant aneurysmal sac expansion: 8 patients underwent a secondary embolization, while an open conversion was performed in the remaining 6 patients (42.8%), 4 of whom, in an elective setting, showed a complete resolution of EL2, while 2 patients treated in an urgent setting died from a ruptured aneurysm. Among the patients treated with a secondary embolization, only 2 patients presented EL2 resolution, while the other 6 patients (75%) showed rEL2. Out of the 38 patients with rEL2, 24 patients did not undergo further interventions; of these, 11 (45.8%) presented sac expansion, and 16% developed type IA EL. Conclusions: A strict follow-up and possibly a more aggressive treatment should be considered in an elective setting for patients with rEL2.