Background/Objectives: Benralizumab is an anti-IL-5 receptor alpha monoclonal antibody that induces the near-complete depletion of eosinophils. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) over an extended 48-month follow-up period, offering one of the longest real-world perspectives available. Methods: This was a single-arm, retrospective, observational, multicenter study involving 123 SEA patients treated with benralizumab at a dosage of 30 mg every 4 weeks for the first 3 doses and then every 8 weeks. The safety endpoints focused on the frequency and nature of adverse events and the likelihood that they were induced by benralizumab. The efficacy endpoints focused on lung function, asthma exacerbations and control, and oral corticosteroid use. Results: Benralizumab, consistent with its mechanism of action, led to the rapid and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils. In total, 26 adverse events (21.1%) were observed, with 1.6% related to the treatment and 0.8% categorized as serious (vagal hypotension). Bronchitis was the most common unrelated adverse event (15.4%), occurring between months 36 and 38. Importantly, benralizumab effectiveness and safety were maintained consistently across the 48-month duration, resulting in significant improvements in lung function and reductions in oral corticosteroid use and exacerbation frequency. Conclusions: Benralizumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile, comparable to previously published studies, with perdurable effectiveness in controlling SEA and reducing oral corticosteroid use. Finally, this study provides evidence that near-complete eosinophil depletion does not increase long-term safety risks and supports benralizumab as a reliable treatment option for SEA patients.

Background/Objectives: Benralizumab is an anti-IL-5 receptor alpha monoclonal antibody that induces near-complete depletion of eosinophils. This study aimed to evaluate the long-term safety and effectiveness of benralizumab in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma (SEA) over a 48-month period. Methods: This was a single-arm, retrospective, observational, multicenter study involving 123 SEA patients treated with benralizumab at a dosage of 30 mg every 4 weeks for the first three doses and then every 8 weeks. The safety endpoints focused on the frequency and nature of adverse events and the likelihood that they were induced by benralizumab. The efficacy endpoints focused on lung function, asthma exacerbations and control, and oral corticosteroid use. Results: Benralizumab, consistent with its mechanism of action, led to rapid and nearly complete depletion of eosinophils. In total, 26 adverse events (21.1%) were observed, with 1.6% related to the treatment and 0.8% categorized as serious (vagal hypotension). Bronchitis was the most common unrelated adverse event (15.4%), occurring between months 36 and 38. Of note, benralizumab maintained its effectiveness over the 48-month period, resulting in significant improvements in lung function and reductions in oral corticosteroid use and exacerbation frequency. Conclusions: Benralizumab demonstrated a favorable safety profile comparable to previously published studies with perdurable effectiveness in controlling SEA and reducing oral corticosteroid use. Finally, this study provides evidence that near-complete eosinophil depletion does not increase long-term safety risks and supports benralizumab as a reliable treatment option for SEA patients.

Background: "Remission" is a primary therapeutic goal in severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), though definitions vary regarding olfactory function. We evaluated "Dual Remission" kinetics in patients treated with dupilumab over 24 months. Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 28 patients with comorbid severe asthma and CRSwNP. Dual Remission was defined as simultaneous asthma remission (ACT ≥ 20, no exacerbations, no OCS) and CRSwNP remission (SNOT-22 < 40, NPS ≤ 1). We additionally analyzed "Complete Recovery" by applying a stricter composite definition requiring the restoration of normosmia (Sniffin’ Sticks score ≥ 12). Results: At baseline, patients exhibited uncontrolled disease (median ACT 19, NPS 6). Treatment led to rapid asthma remission (85.7% at 12 months, 100% at 24 months). CRSwNP remission was slower but progressive, rising from 57% at 12 months to 88% at 24 months, demonstrating a significant "catch-up" phenomenon. Consequently, Dual Remission rates increased from 54% to 88% by month 24. However, when requiring normosmia for "Complete Recovery," only 32% met the criteria, revealing that 56% achieved clinical silence yet remained hyposmic. Conclusion: Dupilumab is highly effective, enabling 88% of patients to achieve Dual Remission after 24 months. However, full olfactory restitution is distinct from structural polyp regression and harder to achieve, likely due to persistent neuroepithelial damage.

Background: “Remission” is a primary therapeutic goal in severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), though definitions vary regarding olfactory function. We evaluated “Dual Remission” kinetics in patients treated with dupilumab over 24 months. Methods: This single-center retrospective study analyzed 28 patients with comorbid severe asthma and CRSwNP. Dual Remission was defined as simultaneous asthma remission (ACT ≥ 20, no exacerbations, no OCS and stable lung function) and CRSwNP remission (SNOT-22 < 40, NPS ≤ 1). We additionally analyzed “Complete Recovery” by applying a stricter composite definition requiring the restoration of normosmia (Sniffin’ Sticks score ≥ 12). Results: At baseline, patients exhibited uncontrolled disease (median ACT 19, NPS 6). Treatment led to rapid asthma remission (85.7% at 12 months, 100% at 24 months). CRSwNP remission was slower but progressive, rising from 57% at 12 months to 88% at 24 months, demonstrating a significant “catch-up” phenomenon. Consequently, Dual Remission rates increased from 54% to 88% by month 24. When applying the stricter “Complete Recovery” criteria requiring normosmia, only 32% met the goal. Conclusion: Dupilumab is highly effective, enabling 88% of patients to achieve Dual Remission after 24 months. However, full olfactory restitution is distinct from structural polyp regression and harder to achieve, likely due to persistent neuroepithelial damage.