Chantel Sloan

Dr. Chantel Sloan

Department of Public Health, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 October 2015 in Journal of the Air & Waste Management Association
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChantel Sloan
Chantel Sloan
TPTyler J. Philipp
Tyler J. Philipp
RBRebecca K. Bradshaw
Rebecca K. Bradshaw
SCSara Chronister
Sara Chronister
WBW. Bradford Barber
W. Bradford Barber
James JohnstonJames Johnston
James Johnston
Continued development of personal air pollution monitors is rapidly improving government and research capabilities for data collection. In this study, we tested the feasibility of using GPS-enabled personal exposure monitors to collect personal exposure readings and short-term daily PM2.5 measures at 15 fixed locations throughout a community. The goals were to determine the accuracy of fixed-location monitoring for approximating individual exposures compared to a centralized outdoor air pollution monitor, and to test the utility of two different personal monitors, the RTI MicroPEM V3.2 and TSI SidePak AM510. For personal samples, 24-hr mean PM2.5 concentrations were 6.93 μg/m3 (stderr = 0.15) and 8.47 μg/m3 (stderr = 0.10) for the MicroPEM and SidePak, respectively. Based on time–activity patterns from participant journals, exposures were highest while participants were outdoors (MicroPEM = 7.61 µg/m3, stderr = 1.08, SidePak = 11.85 µg/m3, stderr = 0.83) or in restaurants (MicroPEM = 7.48 µg/m3, stderr = 0.39, SidePak = 24.93 µg/m3, stderr = 0.82), and lowest when participants were exercising indoors (MicroPEM = 4.78 µg/m3, stderr = 0.23, SidePak = 5.63 µg/m3, stderr = 0.08). Mean PM2.5 at the 15 fixed locations, as measured by the SidePak, ranged from 4.71 µg/m3 (stderr = 0.23) to 12.38 µg/m3 (stderr = 0.45). By comparison, mean 24-h PM2.5 measured at the centralized outdoor monitor ranged from 2.7 to 6.7 µg/m3 during the study period. The range of average PM2.5 exposure levels estimated for each participant using the interpolated fixed-location data was 2.83 to 19.26 µg/m3 (mean = 8.3, stderr = 1.4). These estimated levels were compared with average exposure from personal samples. The fixed-location monitoring strategy was useful in identifying high air pollution microclimates throughout the county. For 7 of 10 subjects, the fixed-location monitoring strategy more closely approximated individuals’ 24-hr breathing zone exposures than did the centralized outdoor monitor. Highlights are: Individual PM2.5 exposure levels vary extensively by activity, location and time of day; fixed-location sampling more closely approximated individual exposures than a centralized outdoor monitor; and small, personal exposure monitors provide added utility for individuals, researchers, and public health professionals seeking to more accurately identify air pollution microclimates. Implications: Personal air pollution monitoring technology is advancing rapidly. Currently, personal monitors are primarily used in research settings, but could they also support government networks of centralized outdoor monitors? In this study, we found differences in performance and practicality for two personal monitors in different monitoring scenarios. We also found that personal monitors used to collect outdoor area samples were effective at finding pollution microclimates, and more closely approximated actual individual exposure than a central monitor. Though more research is needed, there is strong potential that personal exposure monitors can improve existing monitoring networks.

31 January 2017 in Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
HPHannah E. Payne
Hannah E. Payne
MSMichalyn Steele
Michalyn Steele
JBJennie L. Bingham
Jennie L. Bingham
CSChantel Sloan
Chantel Sloan

4 March 2022 in Vaccines
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRDavid S. Redd
David S. Redd
JJJamie Lee Jensen
Jamie Lee Jensen
SHSavannah J. Hughes
Savannah J. Hughes
KPKendall Pogue
Kendall Pogue
CSChantel Sloan
Chantel Sloan
BPBrian Poole
Brian Poole
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is the most common sexually transmitted infection in the United States. Most infections are mild and clear without treatment in 1 to 2 years. Some HPV strains result in persistent infection, which can cause various cancers, including cervical, penile, anal, mouth, and throat cancers. Vaccines have been developed that provide protection against the highest risk HPV strains. Despite HPV vaccines having been proven to be safe and effective, uptake has been low. Religiosity has been negatively correlated with HPV vaccine uptake in some studies. It is hypothesized that religiosity and Christian religious affiliation could impact parents’ decision to vaccinate their children against HPV via teachings and beliefs about sexual behaviors. A survey was distributed to participants to determine what factors, including religiosity and views about sex, impacted HPV vaccination. The survey results (n = 442) were analyzed using confirmatory factor analysis, structural equation modeling, and univariate factor analysis. The association between religious practice and vaccine attitudes were complex, with religious practice slightly positively correlated with pro-vaccine attitudes and vaccine knowledge, but also with the belief that religious adherence to expectations surrounding sexual behavior will protect children from HPV infection, as well as more negative views towards vaccines, in general.

1 May 2017 in Health & Place
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CSChantel Sloan
Chantel Sloan
MHMatthew Heaton
Matthew Heaton
SKSorah Kang
Sorah Kang
CBCandace Berrett
Candace Berrett
PWPingsheng Wu
Pingsheng Wu
THTina Hartert
Tina Hartert

7 July 2022 in Frontiers in Nutrition
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
NBNatalie Bennion
Natalie Bennion
ARAlisha H Redelfs
Alisha H Redelfs
LSLori Spruance
Lori Spruance
SBShelby Benally
Shelby Benally
CSChantel Sloan
Chantel Sloan
The Navajo Nation, an area home to approximately 173,000 people in the southwest United States, experiences the highest rates of food insecurity in the United States and is classified as a food desert. The present study assessed the accessibility to food outlets (grocery stores, convenience stores, and restaurants) as measured by driving time on the Navajo Nation and in selected surrounding border towns. Food outlets located in neighboring border towns were examined using network analysis tools in ArcGIS Pro to calculate driving distance and examine the potential impact of driving time within the Navajo Nation on accessibility to nutritious foods. There were 14 grocery stores, 21 convenience stores, and 65 restaurants identified in the Navajo Nation using Mergent Intellect, a proprietary database, as compared to border towns which had a total of 542 grocery stores, 762 convenience stores, and 3,329 restaurants equaling a ratio of about 50:1 (grocery, 39:1; convenience, 36:1; restaurants, 51:1) when comparing food outlets nearby versus on the Navajo Nation. This ecological study presents a visual representation of driving time and food accessibility, revealing geographic areas within the Navajo Nation where access to border town food stores is sparse, and food insecurity may be elevated.

1 June 2020 in Epidemics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CSChantel Sloan
Chantel Sloan
RCRameela Chandrasekhar
Rameela Chandrasekhar
EMEdward Mitchel
Edward Mitchel
DNDanielle Ndi
Danielle Ndi
LMLisa Miller
Lisa Miller
MLMary Lou Lindegren
Mary Lou Lindegren
Timing of influenza spread across the United States is dependent on factors including local and national travel patterns and climate. Local epidemic intensity may be influenced by social, economic and demographic patterns. Data are needed to better explain how local socioeconomic factors influence both the timing and intensity of influenza seasons to result in national patterns. To determine the spatial and temporal impacts of socioeconomics on influenza hospitalization burden and timing, we used population-based laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalization surveillance data from the CDC-sponsored Influenza Hospitalization Surveillance Network (FluSurv-NET) at up to 14 sites from the 2009/2010 through 2013/2014 seasons (n = 35,493 hospitalizations). We used a spatial scan statistic and spatiotemporal wavelet analysis, to compare temporal patterns of influenza spread between counties and across the country. There were 56 spatial clusters identified in the unadjusted scan statistic analysis using data from the 2010/2011 through the 2013/2014 seasons, with relative risks (RRs) ranging from 0.09 to 4.20. After adjustment for socioeconomic factors, there were five clusters identified with RRs ranging from 0.21 to 1.20. In the wavelet analysis, most sites were in phase synchrony with one another for most years, except for the H1N1 pandemic year (2009-2010), wherein most sites had differential epidemic timing from the referent site in Georgia. Socioeconomic factors strongly impact local influenza hospitalization burden. Influenza phase synchrony varies by year and by socioeconomics, but is less influenced by socioeconomics than is disease burden.