EZH2 is an important enzymatic subunit of the epigenetic regulator polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), which controls gene silencing through post-translational modification, and is overexpressed in various carcinomas and hematopoietic neoplasms. We found that the majority of cases of histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms, including histiocytic sarcoma, follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma, show strong EZH2 expression by immunohistochemical staining, in contrast to benign histiocytic lesions and normal cellular counterparts, which did not show EZH2 expression, suggesting that this molecule may function as an oncogenic protein in these neoplasms. We correlated EZH2 expression with that of p-ERK1/2, MYC, and p-STAT3, potential regulators of EZH2, and found that 60–80% of these cases showed strong p-ERK1/2 expression, and only a minority of cases showed positivity for MYC or p-STAT3 in neoplastic cells. In cases of follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, Langerhans cell histiocytosis, histiocytic sarcoma, and interdigitating dendritic cell sarcoma with strong EZH2 expression, 90%, 89%, 70%, and 100% of cases showed co-expression of p-ERK1/2 with EZH2, respectively, while only a small percentage of these cases showed MYC or p-STAT3 co-expression with EZH2 (≤30%). These findings suggest that the p-ERK1/2 signaling cascade, but not the p-STAT3 and MYC signaling cascades, may regulate EZH2 expression in histiocytic and dendritic cell neoplasms, and that EZH2 and the p-ERK1/2 signaling cascade could serve as therapeutic targets for the treatment of these neoplasms. Interestingly, only a minority of cases of blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasm exhibited high EZH2 expression, and only a minority of these cases showed p-ERK1/2 co-expression, suggesting that alternative mechanisms may contribute to tumorigenesis in this aggressive neoplasm.

EZH2 is a methyltransferase that plays an important tumorigenic role in various neoplasms. We previously found that EZH2 is expressed in a range of aggressive B-cell lymphomas (ABCLs), T-cell lymphomas, and histiocytic neoplasms, with differential expression of intracellular signaling molecules p-ERK, MYC, and p-STAT3, potential regulators of EZH2 expression. We studied EZH2 expression in nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL), classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), T-cell/histiocyte-rich large B-cell lymphoma (THRLBCL), and B-cell Lymphoma, unclassifiable, with features intermediate between diffuse large B-cell lymphomas and classic Hodgkin lymphoma (BCLu-DLBCL/cHL), as well as the coexpression of p-ERK, MYC, and p-STAT3 in these neoplasms. The neoplastic LP cells of NLPHL and Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells of cHL were strongly positive for EZH2, as were the neoplastic cells in THRLBCL and BCLu-DLBCL/cHL. EZH2 expression correlated with proliferation rate, as assessed by Ki-67 staining. LP cells in NLPHL and Hodgkin/Reed-Sternberg cells in cHL were strongly positive for p-ERK, p-STAT3, and MYC, as were the neoplastic cells in THRLBCL and BCLu-DLBCL/cHL, in contrast to the differential expression of these molecules seen in ABCLs. These findings suggest that combined expression of p-ERK, MYC, and p-STAT3 is a useful immunohistochemical pattern for the diagnosis of EZH2-positive Hodgkin lymphomas and related lymphomas, in contrast to ABCLs. Furthermore, the overexpression of EZH2, in association with coexpression of tumorigenic signaling molecules, suggests an oncogenic role for this molecule in the development of Hodgkin lymphomas and related lymphomas. THRLBCL and BCLu-DLBCL/cHL appear to have a mechanism for the regulation of EZH2 expression that is similar to NLPHL and cHL and different from that of ABCLs. In addition, EZH2 and associated signaling cascades may serve as therapeutic targets for the treatment of Hodgkin lymphomas and related lymphomas.

MYC deregulation occurs in the majority of multiple myeloma cases and is associated with progression and worse prognosis. Enhanced MYC expression occurs in about 70% of patients with multiple myeloma, but it is known to be driven by translocation or amplification events in only ∼40% of myelomas. Here, we used CRISPR interference to uncover an epigenetic mechanism of MYC regulation whereby increased accessibility of a plasma cell-type–specific enhancer leads to increased MYC expression. This native enhancer activity was not associated with enhancer hijacking events but led to specific binding of cMAF, IRF4, and SPIB transcription factors that activated MYC expression in the absence of known genetic aberrations. In addition, focal amplification was another mechanism of activation of this enhancer in approximately 3.4% of patients with multiple myeloma. Together, these findings define an epigenetic mechanism of MYC deregulation in multiple myeloma beyond known translocations or amplifications and point to the importance of noncoding regulatory elements and their associated transcription factor networks as drivers of multiple myeloma progression. Significance: The discovery of a native developmental enhancer that sustains the expression of MYC in a subset of myelomas could help identify predictive biomarkers and therapeutic targets to improve the outcomes of patients with multiple myeloma.

To evaluate the performance of a Russell viper venom-based activated protein C resistance (APCR) screening test relative to DNA analysis for the factor V Leiden mutation. We evaluated the concordance between Pefakit APCR screening results and DNA analysis for 435 patients homozygous (n = 11), heterozygous (n = 310), or wild-type (n =114) for the G1691A allele. Using receiver operating characteristic analysis, we found that a cutoff of 1.89 for the APCR ratio yields a sensitivity and specificity of 99.1%. In patients with discrepant genotype-phenotype correlation, their APCR may provide a more clinically relevant result. We compared several strategies for employing reflex testing and found that performing initial APCR screening followed by confirmatory molecular analysis on a subset of cases in the borderline regions between the diagnostic groups can reduce unnecessary testing by approximately 80% without compromising diagnostic accuracy.

Lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, a neoplasm of precursor B or T lineage lymphoid cells, usually involves the bone marrow and peripheral blood, and may involve nodal and/or extranodal sites. The diagnosis is based on morphologic assessment, immunophenotypic analysis, usually by flow cytometry, and genetic analysis, including cytogenetics and FISH analysis, as well as molecular diagnostic analysis. This review will focus on the flow cytometric immunophenotypic findings in B- and T-lymphoblastic leukemia/lymphoma, which include expressions of early B or T cell markers, low-level expressions of CD45, as well as expressions of terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT), and, in many cases, stem/progenitor cell marker CD34.