Sharanya Namboodiri

Ms. Sharanya Namboodiri


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

2Years (2025-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SNSharanya Namboodiri
Sharanya Namboodiri
AAAlexander Aranovich
Alexander Aranovich
UHUzi Hadad
Uzi Hadad
LGLevi A. Gheber
Levi A. Gheber
MFMario Feingold
Mario Feingold
Itzhak FishovItzhak Fishov
Itzhak Fishov
Phenotypic variability in isogenic bacterial populations is a remarkable feature that helps them cope with external stresses, yet it is incompletely understood. This variability can stem from gene expression noise and/or the unequal partitioning of low-copy-number freely diffusing proteins during cell division. Some high-copy-number components are transiently associated with almost immobile large assemblies (hyperstructures) and may be unequally distributed, contributing to bacterial phenotypic variability. We focus on the nucleoid hyperstructure containing numerous DNA-associated proteins, including the replication initiator DnaA. Previously, we found an increasing asynchrony in the nucleoid segregation dynamics in growing E. coli cell lineages and suggested that variable replication initiation timing may be the main cause of this phenomenon. Here, we support this hypothesis revealing that DnaA/DNA variability represents a key factor leading to the enhanced asynchrony in E. coli. We followed the intra- and intercellular distribution of fluorescently tagged DnaA and histone-like HU chromosomally encoded under their native promoters. The diffusion rate of DnaA is low, corresponding to a diffusion-binding mode of mobility, but still one order faster than that of HU. The intracellular distribution of DnaA concentration is homogeneous in contrast to the significant asymmetry in the distribution of HU to the cell halves, leading to the unequal DNA content of nucleoids and DnaA/DNA ratios in future daughter compartments. Accordingly, the intercellular variabilities in HU concentration (CV = 26%) and DnaA/DNA ratio (CV = 18%) are high. The variable DnaA/DNA may cause a variable replication initiation time (initiation noise). Asynchronous initiation at different replication origins may, in turn, be the mechanism leading to the observed asymmetric intracellular DNA distribution. Our findings indicate that the feature determining the variability of the initiation time in E. coli is the DnaA/DNA ratio, rather than each of them separately. We provide a likely mechanism for the ‘loss of segregation synchrony’ phenomenon.