To investigate the differences in seismic performance of buckling-restrained braces (BRBs) with significantly different lengths and to explore the influence of length on the energy dissipation efficiency of BRBs within the same structure, this study designed and fabricated two BRBs with lengths of 8.5 m and 3 m based on an actual engineering project. Low-cycle reciprocating load tests were conducted to compare the performance of the two BRBs in terms of hysteretic energy dissipation capacity, tension–compression bearing capacity imbalance coefficient, cumulative plastic deformation capacity, and low-cycle fatigue life. Additionally, the energy dissipation and damping efficiency of BRBs of different lengths within the same structure was analyzed. The results indicate that under cyclic loading based on design displacement, the 8.5 m BRB exhibits a greater equivalent viscous damping ratio, cumulative hysteretic energy dissipation, and cumulative plastic deformation, leading to more efficient energy dissipation and damping effects. The length of the brace is a significant factor affecting the imbalance coefficient of tension–compression bearing capacity, with longer braces resulting in a larger imbalance coefficient. The 3 m BRB shows less deviation from the mean values of various fatigue parameters, indicating more stable low-cycle fatigue performance. Within the same structure, shorter BRBs with larger design displacements achieve higher energy dissipation efficiency, allowing for more effective utilization of their energy dissipation capacity. This study’s conclusions provide valuable references for designers in the rational selection of BRBs of different lengths in actual engineering projects and offer preliminary insights into the energy dissipation efficiency of BRBs of varying lengths within a structure.

Three all-steel buckling-restrained brace (ABRB) specimens without unbonded materials were designed and manufactured. Through low-cycle reciprocating load tests, the seismic performance of these buckling-restrained braces was investigated, and the influence of the absence of an unbonded layer on failure modes, energy dissipation capacity, and low-cycle fatigue life was examined. The research findings suggest that in all-steel buckling-restrained braces lacking an unbonded layer, the excessive friction between the energy dissipation unit and the restraining unit can, to a certain degree, increase local compressive stress. This makes the braces more susceptible to local buckling at the ends. The frictional effect causes the axial force of the ABRB to follow a distribution pattern where it is greater at the ends and smaller in the middle. Correspondingly, the buckling wavelength of the energy dissipation unit shows a pattern of being shorter at the ends and longer in the middle, which also results in a significant cyclic hardening phenomenon in the ABRB. The fatigue performance of the ABRB is inversely related to the amplitude of local buckling in the energy dissipation unit.