John H. Zimmerman

Mr. John H. Zimmerman

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Durham, North Carolina, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 November 2017 in Science of The Total Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TMThomas McHugh
Thomas McHugh
LBLila Beckley
Lila Beckley
TSTerry Sullivan
Terry Sullivan
CLChris Lutes
Chris Lutes
RTRobert Truesdale
Robert Truesdale
BSBrian Schumacher
Brian Schumacher

3 June 2024 in Environmental Science & Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WHW. Matthew Henderson
W. Matthew Henderson
EMEvich Marina
Evich Marina
JWJohn W. Washington
John W. Washington
TWThomas T. Ward
Thomas T. Ward
BSBrian Schumacher
Brian Schumacher
DGDonna A. Glinski
Donna A. Glinski

20 November 2024 in Environmental Science: Atmospheres
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HHHeidi Hayes
Heidi Hayes
CLChris Lutes
Chris Lutes
NWNicola Watson
Nicola Watson
DBDiane Benton
Diane Benton
DHDavid J. Hanigan
David J. Hanigan
AWAlan Williams
Alan Williams
A thermal desorption GC-tandem MS method was developed to measure vapor-phase PFAS and their potential migration into indoor air.

30 October 2018 in Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLChristopher C. Lutes
Christopher C. Lutes
CHChase W. Holton
Chase W. Holton
RTRobert Truesdale
Robert Truesdale
JZJohn H. Zimmerman
John H. Zimmerman
BSBrian Schumacher
Brian Schumacher
Building pressure cycling (BPC) is becoming an increasingly important tool for studying vapor intrusion. BPC has been used to distinguish subslab and indoor sources of vapor intrusion as well as to define reasonable worst case volatile organic compound mass discharge into a structure. Analyses have been performed both semi‐quantitatively with concentration trends and quantitatively with more rigorous flux calculation and source attribution methods. This paper reviews and compares the protocols and outcomes from multiple published applications of this technology to define the key variables that control performance. Common lessons learned are identified, including those that help define the range of building size and type to which BPC is applicable. Differences in test protocols are discussed, recognizing that the complexity of the test protocol required depends on the particular objectives of each project. Research gaps are identified and tabulated for future validation studies and applications.

14 January 2020 in Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LSLloyd Stewart
Lloyd Stewart
CLChris Lutes
Chris Lutes
RTRobert Truesdale
Robert Truesdale
BSBrian Schumacher
Brian Schumacher
JZJohn H. Zimmerman
John H. Zimmerman
RCRebecca Connell
Rebecca Connell

15 September 2015 in Remediation Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CLChristopher C. Lutes
Christopher C. Lutes
RTRobert S. Truesdale
Robert S. Truesdale
BCBrian W. Cosky
Brian W. Cosky
JZJohn H. Zimmerman
John H. Zimmerman
BSBrian A. Schumacher
Brian A. Schumacher