The widely used SAIL (Scattering by Arbitrarily Inclined Leaves) radiative transfer model (RTM) is designed for canopies that can be considered as homogeneous turbid media and thus should be inadequate for row canopies. However, numerous studies have employed the SAIL model for row crops (e.g., wheat and maize) to simulate canopy reflectance or retrieve vegetation properties with satisfactory accuracy. One crucial reason may be that under certain conditions, a row crop canopy can be considered as a turbid medium, fulfilling the assumption of the SAIL model. Yet, a comprehensive analysis about the performance of SAIL in row canopies under various conditions is currently absent. In this study, we employed field datasets of wheat canopies and synthetic datasets of wheat and maize canopies to explore the impacts of the vegetation cover fraction (fCover), solar angle and soil background on the performance of SAIL in row crops. In the numerical experiments, the LESS 3D RTM was used as a reference to evaluate the performance of SAIL for various scenarios. The results show that the fCover is the most significant factor, and the row canopy with a high fCover has a low soil background influence. For a non-black soil background, both the field measurement and simulation datasets showed that the SAIL model accuracy initially decreased, and then increased with an increasing fCover, with the most significant errors occurring when the fCover was between about 0.4 and 0.7. As for the solar angles, the accuracy of synthetic wheat canopy will be higher with a larger SZA (solar zenith angle), but that of a synthetic maize canopy is little affected by the SZA. The accuracy of the SAA (solar azimuth angle) in an across-row direction is always higher than that in an along-row direction. Additionally, when the SZA ranges from 65° to 75° and the fCover of wheat canopies are greater than 0.6, SAIL can simulate the canopy reflectance with satisfactory accuracy (rRMSE < 10%); the same accuracy can be achieved in maize canopies as long as the fCover is greater than 0.8. These findings provide insight into the applicability of SAIL in row crops and support the use of SAIL in row canopies under certain conditions (with rRMSE < 10%).

Daily water stress reflects the water stress status of crops on a specific day, which is crucial for studying drought progression and guiding precision irrigation. However, accurately monitoring the daily water stress remains challenging, particularly when eliminating the impact of historical stress and normal growth. Recent studies have demonstrated that the diurnal characteristics of the crop canopy obtained via remote sensing techniques can be used to assess daily water stress levels effectively. Remote sensing observations, such as the solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and reflectance, offer information on the crop canopy structure, physiology, or their combination. However, the sensitivity of different structural, physiological, or combined remote sensing variables to the daily water stress remains unclear. We investigated this issue via continuous measurements of the active fluorescence, leaf rolling, and canopy spectra of maize under different irrigation conditions. The results indicated that with increasing water stress, vegetation exhibited significant coordinated diurnal variations in both structure and physiology. The influence of water stress was minimal in the morning but peaked at noon. The morning-to-noon ratio (NMR) of the apparent SIF yield (SIFy), in which only the effect of the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is eliminated and in which both structural and physiological information is incorporated, exhibited the highest sensitivity to water stress variations. This NMR of the SIFy was followed by the NMR of the normalized difference vegetation index ($\mathrm{N}\mathrm{D}\mathrm{V}\mathrm{I}$) and the NMR of the canopy fluorescence emission efficiency ($\mathsf{\Phi }{\mathrm{F}}_{\mathrm{c}\mathrm{a}\mathrm{n}\mathrm{o}\mathrm{p}\mathrm{y}}$) obtained via the fluorescence correction vegetation index (FCVI) method, which primarily reflect structural and physiological information, respectively. This study highlights the advantages of utilizing diurnal vegetation structural and physiological variations for monitoring daily water stress levels.

Daily water stress reflects the water stress status of crops on a specific day, which is crucial for studying drought progression and guiding precision irrigation. However, accurately monitoring the daily water stress remains challenging, particularly when eliminating the impact of historical stress and normal growth. Recent studies have demonstrated that the diurnal characteristics of the crop canopy obtained via remote sensing techniques can be used to assess daily water stress levels effectively. Remote sensing observations, such as the solar-induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) and reflectance, offer information on the crop canopy structure, physiology or their combination. However, the sensitivity of different structural, physiological or combined remote sensing variables to the daily water stress remains unclear. We investigated this issue via continuous measurements of active fluorescence, leaf rolling, and canopy spectra of maize under different irrigation conditions. The results indicated that with increasing water stress, vegetation exhibited significant coordinated diurnal variations in both structure and physiology. The influence of water stress was minimal in the morning but peaked at noon. The morning-to-noon ratio (NMR) of the apparent SIF yield (SIFy), in which only the effect of the photosynthetically active radiation (PAR) is eliminated and in which both structural and physiological information is incorporated, exhibited the highest sensitivity to water stress variations. This NMR of the SIFy was followed by the NMR of the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) and the NMR of the canopy fluorescence emission efficiency (ΦFcanopy) obtained via the fluorescence correction vegetation index (FCVI) method, which primarily reflect structural and physiological information, respectively. This study highlights the advantages of utilizing diurnal vegetation structural and physiological variations for monitoring daily water stress levels.