Leonia Nunes

Ms. Leonia Nunes

Centre for Applied Ecology "Professor Baeta Neves", School of Agronomy, University of Lisbon, Tapada da Ajuda, 1349-017 Lisbon, Portugal.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
24 May 2018 in Diversity and Distributions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFrancesco Maria Sabatini
Francesco Maria Sabatini
SBSabina Burrascano
Sabina Burrascano
WKWilliam S. Keeton
William S. Keeton
CLChristian Levers
Christian Levers
MLMarcus Lindner
Marcus Lindner
TKTobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle
Aim: Primary forests have high conservation value but are rare in Europe due to historic land use. Yet many primary forest patches remain unmapped, and it is unclear to what extent they are effectively protected. Our aim was to (1) compile the most comprehensive European‐scale map of currently known primary forests, (2) analyse the spatial determinants characterizing their location and (3) locate areas where so far unmapped primary forests likely occur.Location: Europe.Methods: We aggregated data from a literature review, online questionnaires and 32 datasets of primary forests. We used boosted regression trees to explore which biophysical, socio‐economic and forest‐related variables explain the current distribution of primary forests. Finally, we predicted and mapped the relative likelihood of primary forest occurrence at a 1‐km resolution across Europe.Results: Data on primary forests were frequently incomplete or inconsistent among countries. Known primary forests covered 1.4 Mha in 32 countries (0.7% of Europe’s forest area). Most of these forests were protected (89%), but only 46% of them strictly. Primary forests mostly occurred in mountain and boreal areas and were unevenly distributed across countries, biogeographical regions and forest types. Unmapped primary forests likely occur in the least accessible and populated areas, where forests cover a greater share of land, but wood demand historically has been low.Main conclusions: Despite their outstanding conservation value, primary forests are rare and their current distribution is the result of centuries of land use and forest management. The conservation outlook for primary forests is uncertain as many are not strictly protected and most are small and fragmented, making them prone to extinction debt and human disturbance. Predicting where unmapped primary forests likely occur could guide conservation efforts, especially in Eastern Europe where large areas of primary forest still exist but are being lost at an alarming pace.

15 September 2020 in Diversity and Distributions
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFrancesco M. Sabatini
Francesco M. Sabatini
WKWilliam S. Keeton
William S. Keeton
MLMarcus Lindner
Marcus Lindner
MSMiroslav Svoboda
Miroslav Svoboda
PVPieter Verkerk
Pieter Verkerk
TKTobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle
Aims: Primary forests are critical for forest biodiversity and provide key ecosystem services. In Europe, these forests are particularly scarce and it is unclear whether they are sufficiently protected. Here we aim to: (a) understand whether extant primary forests are representative of the range of naturally occurring forest types, (b) identify forest types which host enough primary forest under strict protection to meet conservation targets and (c) highlight areas where restoration is needed and feasible.Location: Europe.Methods: We combined a unique geodatabase of primary forests with maps of forest cover, potential natural vegetation, biogeographic regions and protected areas to quantify the proportion of extant primary forest across Europe's forest types and to identify gaps in protection. Using spatial predictions of primary forest locations to account for underreporting of primary forests, we then highlighted areas where restoration could complement protection.Results: We found a substantial bias in primary forest distribution across forest types. Of the 54 forest types we assessed, six had no primary forest at all, and in two‐thirds of forest types, less than 1% of forest was primary. Even if generally protected, only ten forest types had more than half of their primary forests strictly protected. Protecting all documented primary forests requires expanding the protected area networks by 1,132 km2 (19,194 km2 when including also predicted primary forests). Encouragingly, large areas of non‐primary forest existed inside protected areas for most types, thus presenting restoration opportunities.Main conclusion: Europe's primary forests are in a perilous state, as also acknowledged by EU's “Biodiversity Strategy for 2030.” Yet, there are considerable opportunities for ensuring better protection and restoring primary forest structure, composition and functioning, at least partially. We advocate integrated policy reforms that explicitly account for the irreplaceable nature of primary forests and ramp up protection and restoration efforts alike.

1 February 2022 in Forest Ecology and Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
TGThomas Gschwantner
Thomas Gschwantner
IAIciar Alberdi
Iciar Alberdi
SBSébastien Bauwens
Sébastien Bauwens
SBSusann Bender
Susann Bender
DBDragan Borota
Dragan Borota
STStein M. Tomter
Stein M. Tomter

17 August 2021 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FSFrancesco Maria Sabatini
Francesco Maria Sabatini
HBHendrik Bluhm
Hendrik Bluhm
ZKZoltan Kun
Zoltan Kun
DADmitry Aksenov
Dmitry Aksenov
JAJosé A. Atauri
José A. Atauri
TKTobias Kuemmerle
Tobias Kuemmerle
Primary forests, defined here as forests where the signs of human impacts, if any, are strongly blurred due to decades without forest management, are scarce in Europe and continue to disappear. Despite these losses, we know little about where these forests occur. Here, we present a comprehensive geodatabase and map of Europe’s known primary forests. Our geodatabase harmonizes 48 different, mostly field-based datasets of primary forests, and contains 18,411 individual patches (41.1 Mha) spread across 33 countries. When available, we provide information on each patch (name, location, naturalness, extent and dominant tree species) and the surrounding landscape (biogeographical regions, protection status, potential natural vegetation, current forest extent). Using Landsat satellite-image time series (1985–2018) we checked each patch for possible disturbance events since primary forests were identified, resulting in 94% of patches free of significant disturbances in the last 30 years. Although knowledge gaps remain, ours is the most comprehensive dataset on primary forests in Europe, and will be useful for ecological studies, and conservation planning to safeguard these unique forests.

5 May 2021 in Fire
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Cátia MagroCátia Magro
Cátia Magro
Leonia NunesLeonia Nunes
Leonia Nunes
OGOriana C. Gonçalves
Oriana C. Gonçalves
Nuno R. NengNuno R. Neng
Nuno R. Neng
JNJosé Nogueira
José Nogueira
PVPedro M. Vieira
Pedro M. Vieira
Large forest fires have repeatedly affected Europe, in particular the Mediterranean countries. It is now crucial to continue the effort to feed the several layers of prediction models and understand how wildfire spreads in order to develop modern preventative and mitigation methods. The present study evaluates the performance of Sentinel 5-P TROPOMI for the monitoring of carbon monoxide (CO) and methane (CH4) during extreme fire events in Portugal, focusing on the Monchique (2018) and Vila de Rei/Mação (2019) wildfires, which devastated 27,154 ha and 9249 ha, respectively. The spatial distribution and trend of CO and CH4 prior to, during, and following the fire event were accessed and linked with in situ data in a qualitative and quantitative exploration. Large CO plumes were observed with CO columns exceeding 4.5 × 1018 and 6 × 1018 molecules/cm2 on 21 July 2019, and 7 August 2018, respectively. CO distribution profiles after consecutive digital processing steps showed the ability to follow CO fluctuations according to the fire spread. Furthermore, statistically significant differences were found between CO emissions inside and outside the burning area in both fire events. Finally, the CO2 estimated through CO column data presented an emission of 7.6 × 1019 molecules/cm2 for the uppermost emission day on 7 August 2018. Although CH4 monitoring is still unwavering to draw exact conclusions, the CO patterns during extreme fire events show promising and consistent data when compared with in situ data.

1 February 2020 in Forest Policy and Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Iciar AlberdiIciar Alberdi
Iciar Alberdi
SBS. Bender
S. Bender
TRT. Riedel
T. Riedel
VAValerio Avitabile
Valerio Avitabile
OBO. Boriaud
O. Boriaud
LMLaura Hernandéz Mateo
Laura Hernandéz Mateo
• For the first time the harmonized forest availability for wood supply is quantified for Europe. • Economic viability is the main restriction to availability of forests for wood supply. • The harmonized forests available for wood supply (FAWS) represent 75–95 % of forest area and biomass. • The reference definition of FAWS is suitable for international reporting.