Yifei Xia

Dr. Yifei Xia

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications


7 November 2026 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJiasheng Zhu
Jiasheng Zhu
YXYifei Xia
Yifei Xia
ZHZhu Hao
Zhu Hao
YZYing Zhou
Ying Zhou
SYShenqiang Yan
Shenqiang Yan
Background: Mirror therapy is widely used in stroke rehabilitation, yet its immediate task-related cortical responses remain incompletely characterized. We used functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) to characterize cortical hemodynamic responses during a mirror task in patients with stroke. Methods: Fifty-one stroke patients with upper limb dysfunction were recruited. Participants performed both a mirror task and a control task, while hemodynamic changes in regions of interest were simultaneously recorded using a 43-channel fNIRS device. General linear model (GLM) analysis was used to compare differences in activation intensity between the mirror task and control task in the cortical regions of interest. Results: Compared with the control task, the mirror task significantly activated 10 channels: CH2, CH3, CH5, CH9, CH11, CH19, CH24, CH25, CH32, and CH33. The activated brain regions were concentrated in the bilateral premotor cortex/supplementary motor area (PMC/SMA), ipsilesional supramarginal gyrus (SMG), ipsilesional primary somatosensory cortex (S1), and contralesional primary motor cortex (M1). Conclusions: The mirror task elicited greater activation than the control task across a distributed cortical network involving bilateral PMC/SMA, ipsilesional SMG/S1, and contralesional M1 in patients with stroke. These findings demonstrate that fNIRS can objectively characterize task-related cortical hemodynamic responses during mirror tasks and provide a basis for future studies linking these cortical response patterns to rehabilitation outcomes.

31 October 2026 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CNChen Nan
Chen Nan
YXYifei Xia
Yifei Xia
LXLinyin Xu
Linyin Xu
JLJUE LIU
JUE LIU
LDLi Ding
Li Ding
YPYixaing Peng
Yixaing Peng
Background: While caffeine may lower ratings of perceived exertion (RPE) or increase power output at a given RPE, whether caffeinated gum produces these effects during perceptually regulated exercise remains unclear. Aim: This study examined whether caffeinated gum increases self-selected cycling output at regulated-RPE in well-trained male athletes. Methods: Twelve well-trained male athletes (age: 21 ± 2 years; body mass: 77.3 ± 6.0 kg; VO2peak: 47 ± 4 mL/kg/min) completed randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover trials separated by 7 days. Athletes chewed caffeinated gum (6 mg/kg) or placebo for 15 min before two 10 min cycling stages at RPE 4 and 7 (0–10 OMNI Scale). Cadence, power output, oxygen uptake, heart rate, and blood lactate concentration were measured. Results: Caffeinated gum significantly increased cadence (RPE 4: 72 ± 7 vs. 66 ± 10 rpm, p = 0.02; RPE 7: 77 ± 9 vs. 71 ± 11 rpm, p = 0.04), total work (53 ± 10 vs. 48 ± 10 kJ, p < 0.01; 87 ± 12 vs. 77 ± 14 kJ, p < 0.01), mean power output (88 ± 16 vs. 79 ± 16 W, p < 0.01; 146 ± 20 vs. 129 ± 24 W, p < 0.01) and peak power output (97 ± 18 vs. 88 ± 17 W, p < 0.01; 166 ± 27 vs. 147 ± 29 W, p = 0.01). Oxygen uptake was also higher in the caffeine condition at both RPE 4 (1.58 ± 0.12 vs. 1.42 ± 0.16 L/min, p = 0.005) and RPE 7 (2.17 ± 0.25 vs. 2.01 ± 0.22 L/min, p = 0.045), whereas heart rate and blood lactate concentration did not differ significantly between conditions (p > 0.05). Conclusion: Caffeinated gum (6 mg/kg) enhances self-selected cycling work at prescribed RPEs, indicating that it alters perceptually regulated exercise intensity in well-trained males.