Qun Zhang

Dr. Qun Zhang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

4Years (2023-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 April 2023 in Frontiers in Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLi Liu
Li Liu
MDMing Ding
Ming Ding
JWJunfa Wu
Junfa Wu
YZYuwen Zhang
Yuwen Zhang
SGShaoqian Guo
Shaoqian Guo
XXXiao Xiao
Xiao Xiao
Repetitive TMS has been used as an alternative treatment for various neurological disorders. However, most TMS mechanism studies in rodents have been based on the whole brain stimulation, the lack of rodent-specific focal TMS coils restricts the proper translation of human TMS protocols to animal models. In this study, we designed a new shielding device, which was made of high magnetic permeability material, to enhance the spatial focus of animal-use TMS coils. With the finite element method, we analyzed the electromagnetic field of the coil with and without the shielding device. Furthermore, to assess the shielding effect in rodents, we compared the c-fos expression, the ALFF and ReHo values in different groups following a 15 min 5 Hz rTMS paradigm. We found that a smaller focality with an identical core stimulation intensity was achieved in the shielding device. The 1 T magnetic field was reduced from 19.1 mm to 13 mm in diameter, and 7.5 to 5.6 mm in depth. However, the core magnetic field over 1.5 T was almost the same. Meanwhile, the area of electric field was reduced from 4.68 cm2 to 4.19 cm2, and 3.8 mm to 2.6 mm in depth. Similar to this biomimetic data, the c-fos expression, the ALFF and ReHo values showed more limited cortex activation with the use of the shielding device. However, compared to the rTMS group without the shielding application, more subcortical regions, like the striatum (CPu), the hippocampus, the thalamus, and the hypothalamus were also activated in the shielding group. This indicated that more deep stimulation may be achieved by the shielding device. Generally, compared with the commercial rodents’ TMS coil (15 mm in diameter), TMS coils with the shielding device achieved a better focality (~6 mm in diameter) by reducing at least 30% of the magnetic and electric field. This shielding device may provide a useful tool for further TMS studies in rodents, especially for more specific brain area stimulation.

1 March 2024 in Cerebral Cortex
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LLLi Liu
Li Liu
MDMing Ding
Ming Ding
JWJunfa Wu
Junfa Wu
YZYuwen Zhang
Yuwen Zhang
QWQianfeng Wang
Qianfeng Wang
QZQun Zhang
Qun Zhang
Neurovascular decoupling plays a significant role in dysfunction following an ischemic stroke. This study aimed to explore the effect of low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on neurovascular remodeling after ischemic stroke. To achieve this goal, we compared functional hyperemia, cerebral blood flow regulatory factors, and neurochemical transmitters in the peri-infract cortex 21 days after a photothrombotic stroke. Our findings revealed that low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation increased the real-time cerebral blood flow in healthy mice and improved neurobehavioral outcomes after stroke. Furthermore, high-frequency (5-Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation revealed stronger functional hyperemia recovery and increased the levels of post-synaptic density 95, neuronal nitric oxide synthase, phosphorylated-endothelial nitric oxide synthase, and vascular endothelial growth factor in the peri-infract cortex compared with low-frequency (1-Hz) repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. The magnetic resonance spectroscopy data showed that low- and high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation reduced neuronal injury and maintained excitation/inhibition balance. However, 5-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation showed more significant regulation of excitatory and inhibitory neurotransmitters after stroke than 1-Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. These results indicated that high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation could more effectively promote neurovascular remodeling after stroke, and specific repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation frequencies might be used to selectively regulate the neurovascular unit.

23 October 2023 in CNS Neuroscience & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLi Liu
Li Liu
HHHan Hu
Han Hu
JWJunfa Wu
Junfa Wu
AKAnthony J. Koleske
Anthony J. Koleske
HCHongting Chen
Hongting Chen
QZQun Zhang
Qun Zhang
Background: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is an effective therapy in post‐stroke motor recovery. However, the underlying mechanisms of rTMS regulates long‐lasting changes with synaptic transmission and glutamate receptors function (including AMPARs or NMDARs) remains unclear.Methods: Mice were received 10‐Hz rTMS treatment once daily on the third day after photothrombotic (PT) stroke for 18 days. Motor behaviors and the Western blot were used to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of 10‐Hz rTMS in the mice with PT model. Moreover, we used wild‐type (WT) and NEX‐α3−/− mice to further explore the 10‐Hz rTMS effect.Results: We found that 10‐Hz rTMS improved the post‐stroke motor performance in the PT mice. Moreover, the levels of AMPAR, vGlut1, and integrin α3 in the peri‐infarct were significantly increased in the rTMS group. In contrast, 10‐Hz rTMS did not induce these aforementioned effects in NEX‐α3−/− mice. The amplitude of AMPAR‐mediated miniature excitatory postsynaptic currents (EPSCs) and evoked EPSCs was increased in the WT + rTMS group, but did not change in NEX‐α3−/− mice with rTMS.Conclusions: In this study, 10‐Hz rTMS improved the glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the peri‐infract cortex through effects on integrin α3 and AMPARs, which resulted in motor function recovery after stroke.


30 March 2026 in Journal of Clinical Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SPShucong Peng
Shucong Peng
STShan Tian
Shan Tian
XLXiuming Li
Xiuming Li
JSJin Sun
Jin Sun
PCPing Chen
Ping Chen
YWYI WU
YI WU
Objectives: To characterize urodynamic findings after lower-level spinal cord injury (LSCI) and to evaluate a new pressure-based classification framework—the bladder–sphincter dyscoordination syndrome (BSDS)—for describing voiding patterns. We also introduce a descriptive “neurogenic bladder outlet obstruction” (NBOO) phenotype for straining-dependent voiding difficulty. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the first urodynamic studies (December 2020–August 2024) in 81 men with LSCI (injury at T10 or below). Key urodynamic measures included detrusor and intravesical pressures during filling and voiding, bladder volumes (first desire to void and capacity), compliance, maximum flow rate (Q_max), post-void residual (PVR), voiding efficiency, and the ratio of detrusor to abdominal pressure rise (ΔPdet/ΔPabd). We compared cases with detrusor overactivity (DO) versus those without DO. Among those with voiding discoordination, we distinguished classical detrusor–sphincter dyssynergia (DSD) from a proposed NBOO phenotype (characterized by abdominal straining pressure ≥ 40 cmH2O, detrusor pressure < 20 cmH2O, incomplete emptying, and no anatomic obstruction). We further classified discoordination cases using the BSDS framework into four subtypes—dual high-pressure (DHP), detrusor-muscle predominant (DMP), dual low-pressure (DLP), and abdominal-pressure predominant (APP)—based on reference pressure thresholds (detrusor 20 cmH2O; abdominal 40 cmH2O). Results: Patients with DO (43.2%) showed significantly higher detrusor pressures during filling (at first desire to void and at capacity) and a lower first desire volume than non-DO patients, while maximum capacity was similar (p = 0.105). During voiding, DO cases had lower PVR and higher emptying rates, although the detrusor-vs-abdominal pressure contribution (ΔPdet/ΔPabd) was comparable between groups. Among 63 patients with voiding discoordination, 32 (50.8%) met NBOO criteria; these NBOO cases exhibited lower detrusor and intravesical voiding pressures but worse emptying (higher PVR) compared to classical DSD cases. Overall, 76 of 81 patients (93.8%) fit within the BSDS classification—distributed as 22 DHP, 13 DMP, 15 DLP, and 26 APP patterns. Conclusions: The BSDS framework (and the NBOO descriptor when conventional indices cannot be applied) offers a novel way to describe voiding patterns after LSCI. It links urodynamic observations to potential management strategies (by identifying whether the bladder or outlet is the primary issue). Prospective studies are needed to validate this framework against outcomes such as upper tract integrity, continence, and dependence on catheterization.

8 May 2026 in Brain Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DWDai Wen
Dai Wen
QZQun Zhang
Qun Zhang
JTJing Tian
Jing Tian
SWShouyan Wang
Shouyan Wang
RLRongrong Lu
Rongrong Lu
Background/Objectives: Upper-limb motor dysfunction is common after stroke, and patients often have limited recovery during rehabilitation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the relationship between contralesional neurophysiological parameters and the effects of rehabilitation on upper-limb motor function in stroke patients with corticospinal tract damage. Methods: Forty patients with subacute stroke with an absent MEP response on the ipsilesional side before admission were included. Contralesional neurophysiological parameters, including resting motor threshold, contralesional MEP, contralesional short-interval intracortical inhibition (short-ICI), and contralesional long-interval intracortical inhibition (long-ICI), were assessed via transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) pre-admission. The coefficients of variation for MEP, short-ICI, and long-ICI were calculated to assess cortical stability. Rehabilitation effect was measured using changes in the Fugl–Meyer assessment score after 21 days of rehabilitation. Results: No single contralesional parameter significantly predicted rehabilitation effect. Further exploratory analysis revealed that a model combining contralesional neurophysiological parameters was associated with proximal limb motor function recovery. Short-ICI played a prominent role in this exploratory model. Conclusions: Contralesional neurophysiological markers demonstrated limited predictive value in patients with stroke with moderate-to-severe motor dysfunction and damaged corticospinal tract function on the ipsilesional side. However, a model combining multimodal contralesional TMS measures, particularly short-ICI, may offer incremental value in predicting proximal limb motor improvement following 21-day rehabilitation. Although this mechanism was not directly measured, the findings suggest a compensatory role of the cortico-reticulo-spinal pathway. These exploratory results should be interpreted with caution regarding their clinical applicability and are premature as a predictive tool, pending rigorous external validation.