Tomasz Szymanski

Mr. Tomasz Szymanski


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 September 2022 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTomasz Mazur
Tomasz Mazur
Lenka CepovaLenka Cepova
Lenka Cepova
TSTomasz Szymanski
Tomasz Szymanski
Miroslaw RuckiMiroslaw Rucki
Miroslaw Rucki
The paper presents the results of the investigations on the direction-dependent accuracy of the point identification during contact probe measurements with a coordinate measuring machine (CMM). Considering the contact point identified by an orthogonal to the surface probe movement, the transformation of coordinates was made in order to calculate the displacement of the measured point. As a result, the positioning accuracy was estimated in three axes. The experiments demonstrated a strong dependence of the displacement on the declination angle. Moreover, it was found that the directional surface texture which provided different roughness in perpendicular directions, had an impact on the positioning accuracy.

23 March 2025 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TMTomasz Mazur
Tomasz Mazur
TSTomasz Szymanski
Tomasz Szymanski
WSWaldemar Samociuk
Waldemar Samociuk
Miroslaw RuckiMiroslaw Rucki
Miroslaw Rucki
TRTomasz Ryba
Tomasz Ryba
This paper presents the results of investigations on the accuracy of contact point identification during coordinate measurement, which is crucial in the context of the Industry 4.0 concept. In particular, the effects of swivel length and probe declination angle during measurement were analyzed. In the experiments, deviations from the expected coordinates (0,0,0) of the contact point were analyzed for different rotational angles of the probing head. It was found that the recommended vertical positioning of the stylus at an angle of A = 0° might have introduced some insignificant errors. Increasing angle A up to 15° generated additional errors of negligible values in comparison with the measurement accuracy of the CMM. However, an increase in angle A up to 90° introduced additional errors as high as 10 μm. This contact point identification error will have a certain effect on the best fitting element and subsequent calculations and on the respective measurement results.