Hip fractures are the second cause of hospitalization in geriatric patients. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification scheme is a scoring system for the evaluation of the patients’ health and comorbidities before an operative procedure. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the ASA score is a predictive factor for perioperative and postoperative complications and a cause of readmission of geriatric patients with hip fractures. The study included 198 elderly patients. The mean values of hospitalization were6.4±2.1days for the patients with ASA II,10.4±3.4days for the patients with ASA III, and13.5±4.4days for the patients with ASA IV. The patients with ASA II exhibited minor complications, while patients with ASA III presented cutaneous ulcer and respiratory dysfunction. Five patients with ASA IV had pulmonary embolism, two patients had myocardial infarction, and three patients died. The ASA score seems to have direct correlation with multiple factors, such as the hospitalization days, the severity of the complications, and the total hospitalization costs. The treatment of geriatrics hip fractures in patients with a high ASA score requires a multidisciplinary approach and a special assessment in order to decrease postoperative morbidity and mortality and offer optimal functionality.

Calcaneal fractures are complex injuries with high complication rates and they can lead to serious disability. The proper management remains controversial and complications may occur regardless of the chosen type of treatment (operative or nonoperative). The present article reviews the studies that are related to the complications of calcaneal fractures. The incidence, the diagnosis, the prevention and the treatment of these complications were researched and analyzed, with the use of PubMed database, abstracts and original articles in English than investigate the etiology. The aim of the article is to discuss the most suitable management of the complications of calcaneal fractures and recommend a specific treatment as well as prevention methods. Levels of Evidence: Level IV

Human pasteurellosis is a severe human infection that accounts for 20-30 human deaths annually worldwide. Mucous secretions derived from pets comprise the primary source of infection, which are transmitted through animal scratches or bites. We describe a case of Pasteurella multocida wound infection in an immunocompetent adult with a decubitus ulcer of the lower extremity. The organism was also isolated from an oral swab of the patient's dog with which he reported close contact. The patient had a favorable outcome following aggressive surgical debridement, antimicrobial treatment and subsequent wound care. Our case illustrates that licking of open wound is an alternative source of infections by Pasteurella multocida, and emphasizes the need for avoidance of wound contact with animals.

Shoulder dislocation is the most common feature in emergencies, while the anterior dislocation of the glenohumeral joint is the most frequent and requires reduction. Accompanied nerve injury is common with an incidence of 21%, while radial nerve palsy is very rare. We describe the case of a 56-year-old man who presented with an anterior dislocation of the left shoulder due to a fall on an outstretched hand with wrist drop 8 hours after injury. Neurological examination revealed loss of sensation along the radial border of the forearm. Closed reduction with Kocher procedure was performed. Magnetic resonance image demonstrated a rotator cuff tear, and 3 weeks after the injury electromyography showed complete radial nerve palsy. A physiotherapy program was applied to the wrist and fingers with the goal of maintaining a full passive range of motion in all joints affected while shoulder rehabilitation started 6 weeks after his fall. Isolated radial nerve palsy associated with an anterior dislocation of the shoulder is very rare but not impossible to occur. Correct diagnosis of the nerve injury associated with the anterior dislocation is very important because it has serious implications on the management and activity morbidity.

Sarcopenia is a progressive aging syndrome with severe socioeconomic costs. Therefore, the early diagnosis of sarcopenia is required to secure early treatment and to enhance quality of life. The Mini Sarcopenia Risk Assessment (MSRA) questionnaire, which is available in seven-item (MSRA-7) and five-item (MSRA-5) versions, is a sarcopenia screening tool that was translated into Greek, adapted, and validated in this study. The present study was developed in an outpatient hospital setting, from April 2021 to June 2022. The MSRA-7 and MSRA-5 questionnaires were translated backwards and forwards and adapted to the Greek language. To validate the MSRA questionnaire as a pre-screening tool to identify the risk of sarcopenia in the older Greek population, both the MSRA-7 and MSRA-5 versions were correlated with the Greek version of the SARC-F questionnaire, which is a widely accepted and well-known tool used in sarcopenia screening. Ninety elderly subjects aged 65–89 years-old with no mobility impairments participated in this study. The questionnaires’ content validity was assessed using the Content Validity Ratio, and the Content Validity Index was calculated for the instrument. The intra-rater reliability was assessed by calculating the Intra-class Correlation Coefficient between the initial assessment and the reassessment of the MSRA questionnaire, which was 0.986, with a 95% Confidence Interval of 0.961–0.995. Concurrent validity was assessed between the Greek MSRA questionnaires and the SARC-F questionnaire using the Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient (p). The Greek MSRA-7 questionnaire had a very high correlation with the SARC-F questionnaire (rho = −0.741, p < 0.001), as did the Greek MSRA-5 questionnaire (rho = −0.724, p < 0.001). The proofs of content validity, concurrent validity, and intra-rater reliability provided for the Greek versions of the MSRA, designated them as reliable pre-screening tools for the detection of sarcopenia in the older population and in clinical practice.

Background/Objectives: Acute isolated distal radioulnar joint (DRUJ) dislocations are rare and often misdiagnosed during initial evaluation due to subtle clinical presentation, low index of suspicion, and imaging barriers. Prompt diagnosis and treatment are critical to avoid chronic instability, limited wrist mobility, and osteoarthritis. This systematic review evaluates the functional outcomes of conservative and surgical treatment protocols for acute isolated DRUJ dislocations. Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, and Mendeley databases (2000–2024) was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria involved adult patients with isolated DRUJ dislocations diagnosed and managed within one week of injury. Studies reporting on underage patients, associated fractures, delayed management, and open injuries were excluded. Data on demographics, injury mechanism, diagnostic methods, treatment protocols, and functional outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: In total, 22 cases across 20 studies were included. The majority (90.9%) were males, with a mean age of 37.9 years (range: 20–70 years). Falls and sports injuries were the major causes, with volar dislocations predominating (18/22). The misdiagnosis rate was equal to 18%. Most cases were treated conservatively with closed reduction and immobilization for an average of 4.9 weeks. Operative treatment was performed in 6 cases, mainly following failed closed reductions. Functional outcomes were generally favorable, although the same parameters were not consistently studied in all patients. Overall, 82% (14 of 17 patients) achieved a full range of motion; 88% (14 of 16 patients) reported no pain, and all assessed cases had stable DRUJs at follow-up. Conclusions: This review highlights the rarity and diagnostic challenges of this injury. The functional outcomes of both conservative and operative treatment are generally satisfactory. Conservative treatment should be the first-line approach, with surgery reserved for irreducible or unstable cases. Future research using standardized outcome measures is needed to provide guidance for clinicians.