Accurate staging and treatment planning are imperative for precise management in Anal Cancer (ACa) patients. We aimed to evaluate the additive and prognostic value of pre-treatment 2-[¹⁸F]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT) in the staging and management of ACa compared to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). This retrospective study was conducted on 54 patients. Pre-treatment 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT studies and MRI reports were compared considering the primary tumor, pelvic lymph nodes, and metastatic lesions. The impact of 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT in the management and its prognostic value, using maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax), were assessed. Discordant findings were found in 46.3% of patients (5 in T; 1 in T and N; 18 in N; and 1 in M stage). 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT resulted in up-staging in 9.26% and down-staging in 3.7% of patients. Perirectal lymph nodes were metabolically inactive in 12.9% of patients. Moreover, 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT resulted in management change in 24.1% of patients. Finally, SUVmax provided no prognostic value. 2-[¹⁸F]FDG PET/CT altered staging and management in a sizable number of patients in this study, and supports a need for a change in guidelines for it to be used as a routine complementary test in the initial management of ACa.

Introduction: Long-term analysis of PACIFIC revealed the clinical benefit of chemoradiotherapy combined with Durvalumab for unresectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) stage III. ALLSTAR is a prospective registry aimed at validating the PACIFIC regimen in daily practice in Austria. Patients and Methods: Patients were eligible if they had pathologically confirmed unresectable NSCLC III with a curative treatment option. The endpoints for this analysis were overall survival (OS), updated local control (LC), and progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The 2- and 3-year LC rates in patients who received total radiation doses > 66 Gy were 80% and 75%, respectively, which were superior to the standard treatment (65% and 54%; p-value 0.085). This benefit was even more pronounced in Durvalumab patients with 2- and 3-year LC rates of 82% and 79% with >66 Gy (p-value 0.068). The 2- and 3-year OS with Durvalumab was 71% and 63%, respectively, compared to 58% and 44% without Durvalumab (HR 0.552; 95%-CI 0.347–0.881; p-value 0.011). Patients who were treated with Durvalumab also had a significantly longer 2- and 3-year PFS (56% and 48%) than those without (35% and 20%; HR 0.469; 95%-CI 0.312–0.707; p-value < 0.001). Pulmonary side effects were observed in 66/188 (35%) patients, with one case of grades 4 and 5 each. Oesophageal toxicity grade 1–3 occurred in 93/188 (49%) cases. Conclusion: The updated ALLSTAR analysis demonstrated sustained benefit of Durvalumab for OS and PFS, as well as a possible long-term benefit of radiation dose escalation > 66 Gy on LC.

Background/Objectives: Current evidence suggests that patients with unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) whose tumours harbour driver mutations do not benefit from immune checkpoint inhibition. Kirsten rat sarcoma virus mutations (KRASmts), however, seem to be the exceptions to the rule. To this end, we compared KRASmt patients who were treated with immunotherapy to those without. Methods: ALLSTAR is a nationwide registry for patients with histologically verified non-operable NSCLC aged 18 or older having a curative treatment option. This report presents a subcohort of KRASmt patients who were recruited between 2020/03 and 2023/04. The diagnostic work-up included ¹⁸F-FDG-PET-CT scan and contrast-enhanced cranial CT or—preferably—MRI. Patients were treated with chemoradiotherapy (CRT) either followed by immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or not. Results: Thirty-two KRASmt patients with a median follow-up of 25.9 months were included in this analysis. After CRT, 27/32 (84%) patients received ICI. The 2-year overall survival rate in KRASmt patients who received immunotherapy was significantly better compared to those without ICI (N = 32; 84% versus 20%; p < 0.001). Likewise, the 2-year progression-free-survival with immunotherapy was also significantly better than in those without ICI (N = 32; 75% versus 20%; p < 0.001). Of the 12/32 patients (38%) who had received radiation doses > 66 Gy, none had a locoregional relapse, whereas in the other 20 patients, 5 (25%) events occurred (p-value = 0.116). Conclusions: Since KRASmt patients could benefit from ICI treatment, immunotherapy should be offered to these patients, similar to those without actionable genetic drivers. Additionally, radiation dose escalation > 66 Gy may also improve locoregional control in this subset of patients.

Background/Objectives: The COVID-19 pandemic significantly threatened cancer patients and oncologic care. The rollout of vaccines emerged as a critical milestone, despite the initial lack of evidence regarding their safety and efficacy in this population. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluate the current evidence on COVID-19 vaccination in patients undergoing radiotherapy (RT). Methods: PubMed, Livivo, Scopus, and Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed for relevant publications on COVID-19 vaccination in the context of radiation oncology, published by 19 April 2024. The treatment effects were calculated as the proportion of seroconverted individuals. Results: A total of 22 studies published between 2021 and 2024 were included, covering various aspects of vaccination, including safety, tolerability, qualitative and quantitative humoral responses, cellular responses, vaccination efficacy, and booster vaccinations. Notably, patients undergoing RT exhibited a high willingness to receive vaccination. Vaccination was overall well tolerated and safe, with a low incidence of side effects, which were primarily mild. The primary meta-analysis showed a seroconversion proportion of 91% [95% CI: 84–96%] overall, with a somewhat higher proportion of 93% in patients receiving RT alone, compared to 90% in patients receiving either RT or RT combined with chemotherapy. Furthermore, immunization during RT led to a sustained increase in antibody titers, with a notable long-term persistence of IgG. Conclusions: COVID-19 vaccines demonstrate excellent safety, immunogenicity, and efficacy in patients receiving RT, who also exhibit a high willingness to be vaccinated. The outcomes observed are comparable to those in healthy controls and superior to those seen in patients receiving other cancer treatments, such as chemotherapy. The vaccination of radiation oncology patients in future pandemics or epidemics is strongly advocated even during active treatment.

Background: Cancer patients are highly prone to infectious diseases. While undergoing antineoplastic treatment, the risk of severe symptoms upon infection increases, necessitating efficient protective measures, such as vaccination. For patients receiving radiotherapy, there is no specific information about humoral immunity. During the COVID-19 pandemic, serial antibody measurements were therefore offered to cancer patients, following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination while obtaining radiotherapy. Methods: Out of 74 enrolled patients, 46 met the inclusion criteria. Two cohorts were allocated, depending on an association with chemotherapy or pure radiotherapy. An additional healthy control cohort of 16 healthcare workers was enrolled. All participants followed a two-fold BNT162b2 vaccine schedule. SARS-CoV-2 binding antibodies were measured serially in a 7-day cycle for 35 days and over the long-term, using the Elecsys^® Anti-SARS-CoV-2 immunoassay. Results: Cancer patients under pure radiotherapy have a comparable humoral vaccination response and long-term persistency of antibodies to healthy controls. Patients receiving additional chemotherapy show a significantly delayed immune response and decreased antibody titers. The vaccine was well tolerated in all cohorts. Conclusions: Pure radiotherapy in cancer patients does not interfere with the vaccine-induced humoral immune response or other immunogenetic aspects, whereas previous or simultaneous chemotherapy does. Findings are of particular relevance for future epidemic or pandemic scenarios.

Introduction: The incidence of NSCLC increases with age, with a median of approximately 70 years at diagnosis. Historically, treatment strategies for locally advanced cancers have been developed predominantly in younger populations, often excluding elderly patients who may present with multiple comorbidities, severely impaired lung function, or decreased performance status, leading to a lack of age-relevant clinical data. Therefore, we performed a subanalysis of real-world data from the ALLSTAR study to investigate the impact of durvalumab and the radiation regimen (sequential versus concurrent) on clinical outcome in elderly patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Methods: We included a total of 171 patients in this subanalysis. All patients were diagnosed with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Patients were divided into two age groups, ≥70 (41%) and <70 years (59%). All of them received curative chemoradiotherapy with (66%) or without (34%) durvalumab. Results: Patients were followed up for a median time of 25.1 months (range: 3.3–52.1). In the elderly group, patients who did not receive durvalumab consolidation had a median PFS of 17 months (95%-CI: 12.4—not reached) and a higher risk of progression (HR = 2.2; 95%-CI: 1–4.6) than those treated with durvalumab, which had a median PFS of 37 months (95%-CI: 24.5—not reached). This difference was statistically significant (log rank p = 0.026). Moreover, the Cox model yielded a hazard ratio suggesting a higher risk of locoregional (HR = 3.8; 95%-CI: 1.28–11.48; log rank p-value =0.01) as well as local recurrence (HR = 5.5: 95%-CI: 1.67–18.1: p-value =0.002) in patients who received sequential chemoradiotherapy compared to those with concomitant chemoradiotherapy in the same age group. In an exploratory analysis based on a Mann–Whitney U test, we did not find significant difference in toxicity between the two age groups. Conclusions: Durvalumab was associated with prolonged progression-free survival, while concomitant radiotherapy showed a trend towards improvement in locoregional and local control in patients aged ≥70. There was no significant difference in treatment toxicity found in the exploratory Mann–Whitney U analysis between the two age groups.