Background: Artificial intelligence chatbot tools responses might discern patterns and correlations that may elude human observation, leading to more accurate and timely interventions. However, their reliability to answer healthcare-related questions is still debated. This study aimed to assess the performance of the three versions of GPT-based chatbots about prosthetic joint infections (PJI). Methods: Thirty questions concerning the diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee PJIs, stratified by a priori established difficulty, were generated by a team of experts, and administered to ChatGPT 3.5, BingChat, and ChatGPT 4.0. Responses were rated by three orthopedic surgeons and two infectious diseases physicians using a five-point Likert-like scale with numerical values to quantify the quality of responses. Inter-rater reliability was assessed by interclass correlation statistics. Results: Responses averaged “good-to-very good” for all chatbots examined, both in diagnosis and treatment, with no significant differences according to the difficulty of the questions. However, BingChat ratings were significantly lower in the treatment setting (p = 0.025), particularly in terms of accuracy (p = 0.02) and completeness (p = 0.004). Agreement in ratings among examiners appeared to be very poor. Conclusions: On average, the quality of responses is rated positively by experts, but with ratings that frequently may vary widely. This currently suggests that AI chatbot tools are still unreliable in the management of PJI.

PRIMARY BONE TUMOURS AND METASTASES: CLINICAL APPROACH

Bone metastases occur when cancer cells from the primary tumor spread to the bones. The incidence of bone metastases is increasing due to the longer survival of patients with primary tumors, driven by advances in cancer treatments. In patients with multiple bone metastases, care is primarily palliative, aiming to improve their quality of life through pain relief. Bone metastases are strongly associated with pathological fractures, particularly in the femur. In these cases, minimally invasive treatments such as percutaneous cementoplasty and internal fixation with intramedullary nails are growing in popularity. Methods: This manuscript focuses on studying these two therapies by developing virtual models using ANSYS^® software. Thermal and thermomechanical analyses were conducted to evaluate the heat effect resulting from the polymerization of different types of bone cement and to assess the benefits of combining it with internal fixation using intramedullary nails made of different materials. Results: The results highlight the advantages of combining these two techniques compared to cementoplasty alone. Furthermore, the use of Gentamicin Bone Cement (CMW 3^®) with an intramedullary nail made of either material has been shown to provide a more significant functional improvement. Conclusions: The combination of cementoplasty with internal fixation is more effective than cementoplasty alone. The use of CMW 3^® cement with an intramedullary nail made of either material provides greater control over the growth of the metastatic lesion. The chosen injection angle results in an excessive volume of cement, causing a high degree of thermal necrosis.