Objective: This systematic review aims to evaluate the impact of incorporating chitosan into dental resin composites on their mechanical, antibacterial, and physicochemical properties. Methods: A comprehensive search of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases was conducted in March 2025 using the following keywords: resin, composite, and chitosan. The inclusion criteria comprised in vitro studies in dentistry evaluating chitosan as a composite additive with full-text availability in English. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by multiple reviewers using standardized tools, and study quality was assessed based on predefined criteria. Results: Seventeen studies met the inclusion criteria. Chitosan concentrations in the composites ranged from 0.25 wt% to 20 wt%. Antibacterial activity was confirmed in six studies, especially against S. mutans, S. sanguinis, and L. acidophilus. Mechanical properties such as fracture toughness, hardness, and compressive strength were generally improved at lower concentrations of chitosan. However, increased chitosan levels were associated with decreased flexural strength and increased microleakage. Shear bond strength (SBS) was unaffected by chitosan in low concentrations (up to 0.25%), while higher concentrations reduced SBS. Fluoride release capacity was assessed in one study, with no significant differences observed. Conclusion: Chitosan-modified dental resin composites exhibit promising antibacterial and mechanical enhancements at low concentrations. However, higher chitosan levels may compromise certain mechanical and adhesive properties. These findings suggest a need for standardized methodologies and further research on long-term clinical implications and fluoride release.

Objective: This systematic review evaluates the evidence on factors affecting fluoride release from compomer restorative materials to provide clinicians with insights for optimizing their use in caries prevention. Methods: In February 2025, an extensive digital search was conducted across reputable databases such as PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search utilized carefully chosen keywords: “fluoride release” AND “compomer” and followed the PRISMA guidelines. Initially, 287 articles were identified, but after applying the inclusion criteria, 34 studies were selected for review. Results: This review found that fluoride release from compomers follows an initial burst phase before stabilizing at lower levels. Fifteen studies proved that compomers release less fluoride than glass ionomer cements but more than composite resins, as concluded from six studies. The release rate is significantly influenced by pH, with acidic conditions enhancing fluoride diffusion. Some studies also highlighted the potential for fluoride recharge through external applications such as toothpaste or varnish. Conclusion: Compomer restorative materials offer a steady, moderate fluoride release that supports caries prevention. Their effectiveness is enhanced in acidic environments, supporting their use in high-risk patients.

Tea is one of the most widely consumed beverages globally and a significant dietary source of fluoride. This systematic review aimed to identify and evaluate the factors influencing fluoride concentration in tea infusions. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in March 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, following PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICO framework. Eligible studies investigated fluoride release in tea infusions, published in English from the year 2000 onward. Thirty articles met the inclusion criteria, and the risk of bias in the articles was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) quality checklist. Fluoride concentration in tea infusions varied widely across studies, ranging from 0.008 to over 8 mg/L. Key factors influencing fluoride release included tea type (with black and green teas showing the highest values), leaf form (powdered and bagged teas released more fluoride than loose leaves), brewing time and temperature, water composition, and the presence of additives such as spices. A longer brewing time and higher temperature consistently increased fluoride extraction. Lower pH or water hardness also significantly affected fluoride availability. Regional origin of tea and production methods were additional sources of variation. Fluoride release in tea is influenced by a complex interplay of botanical, environmental, and preparation-related factors. These findings are clinically relevant, particularly for populations at risk of fluoride overexposure. Further standardized research is needed to inform safe consumption guidelines and public health recommendations.

This systematic review aims to evaluate factors influencing fluoride release from dental nanocomposite materials. A comprehensive database search was conducted in February 2025 using PubMed, Web of Science, and Scopus. The search terms “fluoride release AND nanocomposites” were applied following PRISMA guidelines. Out of 336 initially identified articles, 17 studies met the inclusion criteria and were selected for analysis. Seventeen studies confirmed that fluoride-releasing nanocomposites are effective, with fluoride ion release influenced by material composition, nanofiller type, and storage conditions. Studies showed that acidic environments (pH 4–5.5) significantly enhanced fluoride release, particularly in materials containing nano-CaF₂ or fluoridated hydroxyapatite, which responded to pH changes. Quantitative comparisons revealed that daily fluoride release values ranged from <0.1 μg/cm²/day in commercial composites to greater than 6500 μg/cm²/day in BT-based nanocomposites and up to 416,667 μg/cm²/day in modified GICs. Additionally, some composites exhibited fluoride recharging capabilities, with materials incorporating pyromellitic glycerol dimethacrylate (PMGDM) and ethoxylated bisphenol A dimethacrylate (EBPADMA) demonstrating prolonged fluoride and calcium ion release after recharge exposure, rather than the highest initial values. Despite releasing lower fluoride levels than conventional GIC and RMGI materials, fluoride-releasing nanocomposites demonstrate significant anti-caries potential and clinical applicability, with some formulations supporting periodontal regeneration and caries prevention around orthodontic brackets. However, the lack of consistency in study protocols—including differences in storage media, sample geometry, and measurement methods—limits direct comparison of outcomes. Therefore, the most critical direction for future research is the development of standardized testing protocols to ensure reliable, comparable results across material groups.

Objective: Fluoride is widely recognized for its preventive role against secondary caries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate how environmental and material factors influence fluoride ion release from metal-reinforced glass ionomer cements. Methods: A structured literature search was performed in March 2025 across PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Search terms included combinations of fluoride release AND glass ionomer AND silver OR zinc OR strontium OR copper. The study selection process followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines and was organized using the PICO framework. Out of 281 initially identified records, 153 were screened based on titles and abstracts. After applying predefined eligibility criteria, 23 studies met the inclusion requirements and were included in the qualitative analysis. Results: Among the 23 included publications, 12 involved glass ionomers modified with silver, and 6 of these reported an increase in fluoride release. Seven studies focused on zinc-modified cements, and four examined materials reinforced with strontium. Conclusions: The addition of strontium, titanium oxide, silver nanoparticles, or zirconium oxide increases the release of fluoride ions, while sintered silver reduces it. There is a great discrepancy among researchers regarding the effect of the addition of zinc oxide and its appropriate amount in the glass ionomer material.

Objective: Yttria-stabilized tetragonal zirconia polycrystal (Y-TZP), a variant of zirconia (ZrO₂), has attracted interest as a substitute for titanium in dental and orthopedic implants, valued for its biocompatibility and aesthetics that resemble natural teeth. However, its bioinert surface limits osseointegration, making surface modifications such as calcium phosphate (CaP) coatings highly relevant. Materials and methods: The review process adhered to the PRISMA guidelines. Electronic searches of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library (July 2025) identified studies evaluating CaP-coated zirconia implants. Eligible studies included in vitro, in vivo, and preclinical investigations with a control group. Data on coating type, deposition method, and biological outcomes were extracted and analyzed. Results: A total of 27 studies were analyzed, featuring different calcium phosphate (CaP) coatings including β-tricalcium phosphate (β-TCP), hydroxyapatite (HA), octacalcium phosphate (OCP), and various composites. These coatings were applied using diverse techniques such as RF magnetron sputtering, sol–gel processing, biomimetic methods, and laser-based approaches. In multiple investigations, calcium phosphate coatings enhanced osteoblast attachment, proliferation, alkaline phosphatase (ALP) expression, and bone-to-implant contact (BIC) relative to unmodified zirconia surfaces. Multifunctional coatings incorporating growth factors, antibiotics, or nanoparticles showed additional benefits. Conclusion: CaP coatings enhance the bioactivity of zirconia implants and represent a promising strategy to overcome their inertness. Further standardized approaches and long-term studies are essential to verify their translational relevance.