Agnieszka Łopatka

Dr. Agnieszka Łopatka

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

5Years (2022-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 December 2024 in Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
HYHanna Yarovenko
Hanna Yarovenko
Aleksandra KuziorAleksandra Kuzior
Aleksandra Kuzior
TNTomasz Norek
Tomasz Norek
AŁAgnieszka Łopatka
Agnieszka Łopatka
The article explores how youth perceive the risks of artificial intelligence (AI), based on a survey of 410 university students from Poland, Spain, and Ukraine. The study confirms non-random responses with acceptable internal consistency for categorical variables and complex constructs. The authors built three latent profiles of participants with pragmatic, skeptical, and cautious attitudes towards AI. The scenario approach revealed that respondents are cautious about the use of AI but generally support its implementation under conditions of flexible state regulation. Youth do not see AI as a threat to social equality or the labor market but expect state support through retraining and basic income for laid-off workers. At the same time, there are both optimistic and skeptical scenarios about the future of AI, which depend on the level of awareness and cultural characteristics of the respondents.

1 June 2023 in Economics & Sociology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
HYHanna Yarovenko
Hanna Yarovenko
AŁAgnieszka Łopatka
Agnieszka Łopatka
TVTetiana Vasylieva
Tetiana Vasylieva
IVImre Vida
Imre Vida
Adeyemo, K. A., Isiavwe, D., Adetula, D., Olamide, O., & Folashade, O. (2020). Mandatory adoption of the Central Bank of Nigeria’s cashless and e-payment policy: implications for bank customers. Banks and Bank Systems, 15(2), 243-253. https://doi.org/10.21511/bbs.15(2).2020.21 Barabashev, A., Makarov, I., & Zarochintcev, S. (2022). How to shape government policies on high-technology development using the indicative evaluation of risks? Administratie si Management Public, 38, 70-89. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2022.38-04 Bayram, M., & Akat, M. (2019). Market-Neutral Trading with Fuzzy Inference, a New Method for the Pairs Trading Strategy. Engineering Economics, 30(4), 411-421. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.30.4.14350 Bing, C., & Schectman, J. (2019). Inside the UAE’s secret hacking team of American mercenaries. Retrieved from: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-spying-raven/ (31.01.2023). Bozhenko, V. (2022). Tackling corruption in the health sector. Health Economics and Management Review, 3(3), 32-39. https://doi.org/10.21272/hem.2022.3-03 Bozhenko, V. V., Lyeonov, S. V., Polishchuk, E. A., Boyko, A. O., & Artyukhova, N. O. (2022). Identification of determinants of corruption in government: a mar-spline approach. Naukovyi Visnyk Natsionalnoho Hirnychoho Universytetu, 6, 176-180. https://doi.org/10.33271/nvngu/2022-6/176 Bozhenko, V., Mynenko, S., & Shtefan, A. (2022b). Financial Fraud Detection on Social Networks Based on a Data Mining Approach. Financial Markets, Institutions and Risks, 6(4), 119-124. https://doi.org/10.21272/fmir.6(4).119-124.2022 Caballero-Morales, S.-O., Cordero Guridi, J. de J., Alvarez-Tamayo, R. I., & Cuautle-Gutiérrez, L. (2020). EDUCATION 4.0 to support entrepreneurship, social development and education in emerging economies. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Knowledge, 8(2), 89-100. https://doi.org/10.37335/ijek.v8i2.119 Chen, Y., Xu, S., Lyulyov, O., & Pimonenko, T. (2023). China’s digital economy development: incentives and challenges. Technological and Economic Development of Economy, 29(2), 518-538. https://doi.org/10.3846/tede.2022.18018 Ćwiklicki, M., & Wojnarowska, M. (2020). Circular Economy and Industry 4.0: One-Way or Two-way Relationships? Engineering Economics, 31(4), 387-397. https://doi.org/10.5755/j01.ee.31.4.24565 DavidPur, N. (2022). Which Countries are Most Dangerous? Cyber Attack Origin – by Country. Retrieved from: https://blog.cyberproof.com/blog/which-countries-are-most-dangerous (31.01.2023). Dečman, M., Stare, J., & Klun, M. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 crisis on the development of the information society in Slovenia. Administratie si Management Public, 39, 77-96. https://doi.org/10.24818/amp/2022.39-05 Deutsche Welle (2022). Ukrainian websites hacked in 'global attack'. Retrieved from: https://www.dw.com/en/ukraine-government-websites-hacked-in-global-attack/a-60421475 (31.01.2023). Dluhopolskyi, O., Pakhnenko, O., Lyeonov, S., Semenog, A., Artyukhova, N., Cholewa-Wiktor, M., & Jastrzębski, W. (2023). Digital financial inclusion: COVID-19 impacts and opportunities. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(3), 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032383 Economist Intelligence (2023). Democracy Index. Retrieved from: https://www.eiu.com/n/campaigns/democracy-index-2022/?utm_source=google&utm_medium=paid-search&utm_campaign=democracy-index-2022&gclid=CjwKCAjwgqejBhBAEiwAuWHioAEruOQA25JyHg-61MBEiYNJp9hvu3Pf91E_tWO2W0nauZ6on003ORoC6UsQAvD_BwE (31.01.2023). E-Governance Academy (2023). National Cyber Security Index. Retrieved from: https://ncsi.ega.ee/ncsi-index/ (31.01.2023). Fobel, P., & Kuzior, A. (2019). The future (Industry 4.0) is closer than we think. Will it also be ethical? Paper presented at the AIP Conference Proceedings, 2186. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5137987 Glova, J., Bernatik, W., & Tulai, O. (2020). Determinant Effects of Political and Economic Factors on Country Risk: An Evidence from the EU Countries. Montenegrin Journal of Economics, 16(1), 37-53. https://doi.org/10.14254/1800-5845/2020.16-1.3 Gontareva, I., Babenko, V., Kuchmacz, B., & Arefiev, S. (2020). Valuation of information resources in the analysis of cybersecurity entrepreneurship. Estudios De Economia Aplicada, 38(4), https://doi.org/10.25115/EEA.V38I4.3984 Gupta, A., & Mishra, M. (2022). Ethical Concerns While Using Artificial Intelligence in Recruitment of Employees. Business Ethics and Leadership, 6(2), 6-11. https://doi.org/10.21272/bel.6(2).6-11.2022 Gurbanov, N., Yagublu, N., Akbarli, N., & Niftiyev, I. (2022). Digitalization and the Covid-19-led public crisis management: an evaluation of financial sustainability in the Azerbaijan business sector. SocioEconomic Challenges, 6(3), 23-38. https://doi.org/10.21272/sec.6(3).23-38.2022 Institute for Economics and Peace (2022). Global Terrorism Index 2022. Retrieved from: https://reliefweb.int/report/world/global-terrorism-index-2022 (31.01.2023). Kaspersky (2023). Cyberthreat real-time map. Retrieved from: https://cybermap.kaspersky.com/ (31.01.2023). Krebs, B. (2021). At Least 30,000 U.S. Organizations Newly Hacked Via Holes in Microsoft’s Email Software. Retrieved from: https://krebsonsecurity.com/2021/03/at-least-30000-u-s-organizations-newly-hacked-via-holes-in-microsofts-email-software/ (31.01.2023). Kumar, N., & Kumar, J. (2019). Efficiency 4.0 for Industry 4.0. Human Technology, 15(1), 55-78. https://doi.org/10.17011/ht/urn.201902201608 Kurniawati, E., Kohar, U.H.A., & Pirzada, K. (2022). Change or destroy: the digital transformation of Indonesian MSMES to achieve sustainable economy. Polish Journal of Management Studies, 26(2), 248-264. https://doi.org/10.17512/pjms.2022.26.2.15 Kuzior, A., & Kwilinski, A. (2022). Cognitive technologies and artificial intelligence in social perception. Management Systems in Production Engineering, 30(2), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.2478/mspe-2022-0014 Kuzmenko, O., Šuleř, P.,...

1 September 2023 in Journal of International Studies
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
UBUjjwal Bhattarai
Ujjwal Bhattarai
AŁAgnieszka Łopatka
Agnieszka Łopatka
Niranjan DevkotaNiranjan Devkota
Niranjan Devkota
UPUdaya Raj Paudel
Udaya Raj Paudel
PNPéter Németh
Péter Németh

19 November 2023 in Journal of Sustainable Development of Transport and Logistics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Wojciech DrożdżWojciech Drożdż
Wojciech Drożdż
Yuriy VovkYuriy Vovk
Yuriy Vovk
Katarzyna Barbara WideraKatarzyna Barbara Widera
Katarzyna Barbara Widera
AŁAgnieszka Łopatka
Agnieszka Łopatka
AGAndrzej Gawlik
Andrzej Gawlik
Purpose: This paper aims to assess the sustainability of energy generation systems in various European Union countries. It seeks to understand the diverse challenges and opportunities these countries face in transitioning to sustainable energy. Methodology: The study employs a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) approach, considering economic, environmental, and social aspects. Data from various databases, including Eurostat, the International Energy Agency, and the World Bank, were analyzed. Results: The results reveal significant variations in sustainability performance across different countries and regions. With strong policy support and high public awareness, Scandinavian countries generally performed well across all sustainability indicators. In contrast, Eastern European countries faced more challenges due to their heavy reliance on fossil fuels. Theoretical Contribution: This study contributes to the ongoing discourse on sustainable energy by providing a comprehensive assessment of the sustainability of energy generation systems. It underscores the complex and multifaceted nature of sustainability and the various factors that influence it. Practical Implications: The findings provide valuable insights for policymakers and energy providers. They highlight the importance of policy support, public awareness, and acceptance in promoting sustainable energy. They also underscore the need for continued efforts and interventions to address the challenges faced by countries heavily reliant on fossil fuels.

30 September 2025 in Human Technology: An Interdisciplinary Journal on Humans in ICT Environments
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Aleksandra KuziorAleksandra Kuzior
Aleksandra Kuzior
AŁAgnieszka Łopatka
Agnieszka Łopatka
YZYong Zhou
Yong Zhou
Judit OláhJudit Oláh
Judit Oláh
This study examines whether national AI vibrancy affects employment structures and unemployment, utilising panel data for 36 countries (2017–2023) from the Stanford AI Vibrancy Index and World Bank indicators. Fixed- and random-effects models, along with Hausman tests and clustered standard errors, were applied. Results reveal no significant short-term effect of AI vibrancy on industrial or service employment, nor on unemployment. GDP per capita showed a modest positive effect on industry (β = 0.046, p < 0.10) and, in some models, on services (β = 0.045, p ≈ 0.06). Labour force participation correlated positively with service employment (β = 0.322, p < 0.10) and negatively with unemployment (β = –0.006, p < 0.01). Strong time effects reflect pandemic-related labour shifts: industrial jobs declined, service employment grew, and unemployment spiked temporarily. Overall, labour dynamics appear driven more by global shocks and demographics than by AI vibrancy.

30 June 2024 in Journal of Business Sectors
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Dominika GajdosikovaDominika Gajdosikova
Dominika Gajdosikova
Katarina ValaskovaKatarina Valaskova
Katarina Valaskova
AŁAgnieszka Łopatka
Agnieszka Łopatka
George LăzăroiuGeorge Lăzăroiu
George Lăzăroiu
Research background: Many authors are currently exploring the impact of the industry on the financial structure of enterprises since there are statistically significant differences across various sectors, exposing the industry as a critical factor influencing corporate indebtedness. Clusters of sectors with homogeneous patterns of indebtedness and comparable levels of debt in various economic conditions may be determined, and, therefore, firms and their debt levels should be systematically examined and evaluated. Purpose of the article: The main aim of this paper is to evaluate the level of debt in the Slovak environment on a sample of 19,480 firms from various sectors and to identify the relationships among them to identify sectors with homogeneous patterns of indebtedness and, consequently, comprehend which sectors are the most stable and independent. Methods: Because NACE classification provides a framework for gathering and presenting statistical data based on many economic sectors, the number of input data was reduced based on cluster analysis. Using Ward's hierarchical clustering method using squared Euclidean distance, selected indebtedness ratios were used to define the sectors with comparable debt levels. To determine if there were statistically significant differences between the calculated debt ratios related to the economic sector, the Kruskal-Wallis test was performed. Subsequently, as the results indicated significant differences across various indebtedness ratios, a post hoc analysis was performed. Findings & Value added: A group of NACE activities in which enterprises are sufficiently comparable that it is appropriate to evaluate their debt levels using the chosen indebtedness ratios are considered to be in sectors C, F, G and H, which included to tertiary sector, while the sectors K, R and S may also be grouped in one cluster, while form the secondary sector. The key relevance of our findings is the benchmarking of selected sectors about indebtedness, which may be used to further examine their growth in each of the V4 nations, which is an essential area for the evolution of the European economy as a whole. Studies considering a relatively significant amount of capital structure determinants may be beneficial to owners and managers, regulators, and financial institutions since debt policy affects firm performance, value, and survival.