MARISA SALVI

Dr. MARISA SALVI

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

7Years (2020-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2025 in Veterinary Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Geovanni Dantas CassaliGeovanni Dantas Cassali
Geovanni Dantas Cassali
KNKaren Yumi Nakagaki
Karen Yumi Nakagaki
MSMARISA SALVI
MARISA SALVI
MRMarina Possa dos Reys
Marina Possa dos Reys
MRMarcos André Nino Rocha
Marcos André Nino Rocha
ALAlessandra Lima
Alessandra Lima
In veterinary medicine, mammary tumors are the most common neoplasms in female dogs and the third most frequent in cats, representing a significant challenge. Efforts have been directed toward adopting standardized diagnostic criteria to better understand tumor behavior and progression in these species. Meanwhile, the use of animal models has substantially advanced the understanding of comparative mammary carcinogenesis. These models provide critical insights into factors responsible for the disease in humans, with the expectation that such factors can be identified and controlled. In this context, this review presents a work based mainly on articles published by a research group specializing in mammary pathology (Laboratory of Comparative Pathology–Department of General Pathology–ICB/UFMG) and its collaborators, complementing their results with literature findings. The publications were categorized into animal research, experimental research, and human research. These studies addressed topics such as diagnosis, prognostic and predictive factors, tumor microenvironment, inflammation associated with tumors, treatment approaches, and factors influencing tumor growth. The conceptual network analysis underscores the importance of in vivo breast cancer models, both experimental and spontaneous, for understanding tumor progression mechanisms and therapeutic responses, offering valuable contributions to veterinary and human oncology.

3 April 2025 in bioRxiv
Verified
Preprint
Open access
PDF file
TIThe Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative
The Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative
OAOlavo Bohrer Amaral
Olavo Bohrer Amaral
CCClarissa França Dias Carneiro
Clarissa França Dias Carneiro
KNKleber Neves
Kleber Neves
ASAna Paula Wasilewska Sampaio
Ana Paula Wasilewska Sampaio
WAWanessa Fernanda Altei
Wanessa Fernanda Altei
Concerns over the replicability and reproducibility of published research have grown in many research fields, but empirical data to inform policies are still scarce. Biomedical research in Brazil expanded rapidly over the last three decades, with no systematic assessment of the replicability of its findings. With this in mind, we set up the Brazilian Reproducibility Initiative, a multicenter replication of published experiments from Brazilian science using three common experimental methods: the MTT assay, the reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the elevated plus maze (EPM). A total of 56 laboratories performed 143 replications of 56 experiments; of these, 90 replications of 45 experiments were considered valid by an independent committee. Replication rates for these experiments varied between 20 and 44% according to five predefined criteria. In median terms, ratios between group means were 58% lower in replications than in original experiments, while coefficients of variation were 82% higher. Effect size decrease was smaller for MTT experiments, original results with less variability and those considered more challenging to replicate, while t values for replications were positively correlated with researcher predictions about replicability, and negatively correlated with the rate of publications by the original article’s last author. Deviations from preregistered protocols were very common in replications, most frequently due to reasons inherent to the experimental model or related to infrastructure and logistics. Our results highlight factors that limit the replicability of results published by researchers in Brazil and suggest ways by which this scenario can be improved.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAna Paula Vargas Garcia
Ana Paula Vargas Garcia
MSMARISA SALVI
MARISA SALVI
LRLuana Aparecida Reis
Luana Aparecida Reis
BRBárbara Regina Melo Ribeiro
Bárbara Regina Melo Ribeiro
CNCristiana Nunes
Cristiana Nunes
Geovanni Dantas CassaliGeovanni Dantas Cassali
Geovanni Dantas Cassali
The tumor microenvironment (TME) plays a central role in cancer progression, with tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and extracellular matrix (ECM) components such as collagen being key modulators of invasiveness and immune regulation. Although macrophage infiltration and ECM remodeling are well-documented individually, their coordinated contribution to mammary carcinoma aggressiveness remains underexplored, particularly in comparative oncology models. This study analyzed 117 mammary carcinoma samples—59 from dogs and 58 from women—using immunohistochemistry, immunofluorescence, and second-harmonic-generation (SHG) microscopy. We quantified TAM density and phenotype (CD206, iNOS, and S100A8/A9), assessed collagen fiber organization, and examined correlations with clinical–pathological variables and overall survival. Increased TAM infiltration was associated with a higher histological grade, aggressive molecular subtypes, enhanced cell proliferation, and shortened survival in dogs. High TAM density also correlated with decreased collagen fiber length and increased alignment, suggesting active immune–matrix remodeling in aggressive tumors. Macrophage phenotyping revealed heterogeneous populations, with CD206+ cells predominating in high-grade tumors, while S100A8/A9+/iNOS+ phenotypes were enriched in less aggressive subtypes. The findings were consistent across species, reinforcing the relevance of canine models. Our results identify macrophage–collagen interactions as critical determinants of tumor aggressiveness in mammary carcinomas. This study bridges comparative oncology and translational research by proposing immune–ECM signatures as potential prognostic biomarkers and therapeutic targets. These insights contribute to the advancement of molecular oncology in Brazil by supporting innovative strategies that integrate immune modulation and matrix-targeted interventions in breast cancer.

1 January 2020
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
PDF file
MSMARISA SALVI
MARISA SALVI
JMJulia Monitchele Ramos de Oliveira Moreira
Julia Monitchele Ramos de Oliveira Moreira
MJMikaelly Aurelina Ferreira De Jesus
Mikaelly Aurelina Ferreira De Jesus
SOStephanee Oliveira
Stephanee Oliveira
VLVinícius Meneses Lelis
Vinícius Meneses Lelis
AGAndreia Guimarães
Andreia Guimarães
A enxaqueca ocupa a 19ª posição no ranking da Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) de doenças que causam mau desempenho ou perdas de dias de trabalho, pode apresentar-se de forma episódica ou recorrente

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BPBarbara Fernandes Pinto
Barbara Fernandes Pinto
MPMateus Prates-Rodrigues
Mateus Prates-Rodrigues
DNDaniel Nobre
Daniel Nobre
MSMariana de Oliveira Silva
Mariana de Oliveira Silva
BSBárbara Maria de Amorim Santos
Bárbara Maria de Amorim Santos
JCJuliana Carvalho-Tavares
Juliana Carvalho-Tavares
Targeted therapies have substantially advanced cancer treatment; however, therapeutic resistance remains a major challenge, particularly in lung cancer. Polo-like kinase 1 (PLK-1), a key regulator of mitosis, is frequently overexpressed in lung tumors and has emerged as an attractive anticancer target. Although PLK-1 inhibition induces robust antitumor effects in preclinical models, its translation into clinical benefit has been limited, particularly when used as monotherapy. Previous in vitro work from our group demonstrated that combining PLK-1 inhibition with the pro-apoptotic agent Navitoclax markedly enhanced cancer cell death by reducing mitotic slippage and promoting post-mitotic apoptosis. Here, we investigated whether this combinatorial strategy translates into therapeutic benefit in vivo. Using Lewis lung carcinoma (LLC1) cells, we evaluated the effects of BI2536 (a PLK-1 inhibitor) and Navitoclax, alone or in combination, in vitro and in male C57BL/6J mice using three lung cancer models: subcutaneous, intranasal, and intrapulmonary. The in vitro results corroborated the findings of our previous work, demonstrating synergistic effects. In the murine models, tumor progression, body weight, survival, and histopathological features were assessed to evaluate therapeutic efficacy and systemic toxicity. In the subcutaneous model, BI2536 monotherapy significantly reduced tumor volume compared with vehicle-treated controls, while Navitoclax alone and the combination therapy also produced tumor growth inhibition. In contrast, in the intranasal model, no significant differences were observed in body weight or survival among groups. Nonetheless, treatment with BI2536 alone or in combination with Navitoclax significantly reduced tumor cell proliferative activity. In the aggressive intrapulmonary (orthotopic) model, rapid disease progression and high mortality were observed across all groups. Notably, BI2536 treatment was associated with improved survival compared with Navitoclax monotherapy, whereas the combination therapy did not confer additional survival benefit. Histological analyses revealed highly proliferative tumors with pronounced cellular and nuclear atypia. Moreover, the BI2536 monotherapy group exhibited significantly greater necrosis/apoptosis than the other treatment groups, while diffuse and focal hepatic steatosis was observed exclusively in the combination group. Together, these findings indicate that while PLK-1 inhibition exerts antitumor effects in certain in vivo contexts, the therapeutic synergy observed in vitro with Navitoclax does not consistently translate to in vivo lung cancer models. This study highlights the challenges of translating combinatorial mitotic and apoptotic targeting strategies into effective in vivo therapies and underscores the importance of model selection and tumor microenvironment in preclinical drug evaluation.