Karin Bernsmed

Dr. Karin Bernsmed

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2022 in Journal of Systems and Software
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KBKarin Bernsmed
Karin Bernsmed
Daniela Soares CruzesDaniela Soares Cruzes
Daniela Soares Cruzes
Martin Gilje JaatunMartin Gilje Jaatun
Martin Gilje Jaatun
MIMonica Iovan
Monica Iovan

20 May 2022 in Journal of Air Transport Management
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
KBKarin Bernsmed
Karin Bernsmed
GBGuillaume Bour
Guillaume Bour
MLMartin Lundgren
Martin Lundgren
EBErik Bergström
Erik Bergström

1 February 2022 in Journal of Information Security and Applications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Per Håkon MelandPer Håkon Meland
Per Håkon Meland
DNDag Atle Nesheim
Dag Atle Nesheim
KBKarin Bernsmed
Karin Bernsmed
GSGuttorm Sindre
Guttorm Sindre

27 August 2015
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PDF file
Martin Gilje JaatunMartin Gilje Jaatun
Martin Gilje Jaatun
DCDaniela S. Cruzes
Daniela S. Cruzes
KBKarin Bernsmed
Karin Bernsmed
ITInger Anne Tøndel
Inger Anne Tøndel
LRLillian Røstad
Lillian Røstad

5 May 2021 in Electronics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Per Håkon MelandPer Håkon Meland
Per Håkon Meland
STShukun Tokas
Shukun Tokas
GEGencer Erdogan
Gencer Erdogan
KBKarin Bernsmed
Karin Bernsmed
AOAida Omerovic
Aida Omerovic
A security indicator is a sign that shows us what something is like or how a situation is changing and can aid us in making informed estimations on cyber risks. There are many different breeds of security indicators, but, unfortunately, they are not always easy to apply due to a lack of available or credible sources of data. This paper undertakes a systematic mapping study on the academic literature related to cyber security indicator data. We identified 117 primary studies from the past five years as relevant to answer our research questions. They were classified according to a set of categories related to research type, domain, data openness, usage, source, type and content. Our results show a linear growth of publications per year, where most indicators are based on free or internal technical data that are domain independent. While these indicators can give valuable information about the contemporary cyber risk, the increasing usage of unconventional data sources and threat intelligence feeds of more strategic and tactical nature represent a more forward-looking trend. In addition, there is a need to take methods and techniques developed by the research community from the conceptual plane and make them practical enough for real-world application.

26 June 2024
Verified
Conference Paper
Open access
STSteve Taylor
Steve Taylor
Martin Gilje JaatunMartin Gilje Jaatun
Martin Gilje Jaatun
KBKarin Bernsmed
Karin Bernsmed
CAChristos Androutsos
Christos Androutsos
DFDietmar Frey
Dietmar Frey
Konstantinos KatzisKonstantinos Katzis
Konstantinos Katzis
MDCG 2019-16 is intended to assist practitioners in compliance with the Medical Device Regulation and the In-Vitro Device Regulation. This paper presents a gap analysis of MDCG 2019-16, identifying key gaps and proposing a robust set of recommendations to enhance the IoMT regulatory framework. This work has been undertaken by a selection of current (2023-2025) projects, all funded under the Horizon Europe call “Enhancing cybersecurity of connected medical devices”: HORIZON-HLTH-2022-IND-13-01, and this paper summarises observations and recommendations from across these projects. There is considerable consensus across the projects in many recommendation themes, notably; linking cybersecurity with patient safety and privacy; keeping the guidelines current; and usage recipes for the guidelines. The paper also suggests toolkit solutions to address some of the recommendations.