Introduction: Distinguishing benign adnexal masses from malignant tumors plays an important role in preoperative planning and improving patients’ survival rates. The International Ovarian Tumor Analysis (IOTA) group developed a model termed the Assessment of Different NEoplasias in the adneXa (ADNEX). Objective: Our objective was to evaluate the performance of the ADNEX model in distinguishing between benign and malignant tumors at a cutoff value of 10%. Methods: This was a prospective diagnostic study. 357 patients with an adnexal mass who were scheduled for surgery at Siriraj Hospital were included from May 1, 2018, to May 30, 2019. All patients were undergoing ultrasonography, and serum CA125 was measured. Data were calculated by the ADNEX model via an IOTA ADNEX calculator. Results: Of the 357 patients, 296 had benign tumors and 61 had malignant tumors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for using the ADNEX model was 0.975 (95% confidence interval, 0.953–0.988). At a 10% cutoff, the sensitivity was 98.4% and specificity was 87.2%. The best cutoff value was at 16.6% in our population. Conclusions: The performance of the ADNEX model in differentiating benign and malignant tumors was excellent.
26 July 2020 in Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Research
This study aimed to investigate the relationship between menopausal hormone therapy (MHT) and endometriosis recurrence in women who underwent hysterectomy with bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy to tr...
Background/Objectives: Polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) is a prevalent endocrine disorder affecting women of reproductive age. It is associated with glucose intolerance, insulin resistance and diabetes mellitus. The oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) is commonly employed to detect glucose intolerance, but it can be inconvenient and time-consuming. We aimed to evaluate the precision of haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and other serum markers in predicting abnormal glucose tolerance (AGT). Methods: This diagnostic study involved 121 PCOS women who attended the Gynaecologic Endocrinology Unit at Siriraj Hospital. Patients underwent assessments for weight, height, waist circumference, modified Ferriman–Gallwey score and acanthosis nigricans. Blood samples were collected to measure fasting glucose and insulin levels after a 75-gram oral OGTT, fasting insulin level, HbA1c, lipid profile, androgen profile and complete blood count. Homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), homeostasis model assessment of beta-cell function (HOMA-β), quantitative insulin sensitivity check index (QUICKI) and fasting glucose-to-insulin ratio (G/I ratio) were calculated. The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of these serum markers were compared. Results: The prevalence of AGT was 24.8%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for HbA1c in detecting AGT was 0.656, while HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, QUICKI and the G/I ratio had values of 0.817, 0.737, 0.817 and 0.77, respectively. The G/I ratio cut-off point of 6% demonstrated a sensitivity of 73.3%, specificity of 74.7%, positive predictive value of 48.9%, negative predictive value of 89.5% and accuracy of 74.4%. Conclusions: The G/I ratio is the most accurate compared to other serum markers in detecting AGT among Thai women with PCOS.