Edin Omerdic

Dr. Edin Omerdic

Department of Electronic & Computer Engineering, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 September 2018 in Ocean Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSatja Sivčev
Satja Sivčev
JCJoseph Coleman
Joseph Coleman
EOEdin Omerdic
Edin Omerdic
GDGerard Dooly
Gerard Dooly
DTDaniel Toal
Daniel Toal

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RCRomano Capocci
Romano Capocci
GDGerard Dooly
Gerard Dooly
EOEdin Omerdic
Edin Omerdic
JCJoseph Coleman
Joseph Coleman
Thomas NeweThomas Newe
Thomas Newe
DTDaniel Toal
Daniel Toal
This paper presents a review of inspection-class Remotely Operated Vehicles (ROVs). The review divides the classification of inspection-class ROVs; categorising the vehicles in order of size and capability. A state of the art technology review is undertaken, discussing various common subsystems of the ROV. Standard and novel ROV shapes and designs are reviewed, with emphasis on buoyancy, frame materials and hydrodynamics. Several power considerations and designs are discussed, accounting for battery fed and mains fed systems. ROV telemetry is split into a discussion on the various transmission hardware systems and the communication protocols that are most widely used in industry and research today. A range of thruster technologies is then introduced with consideration taken of the various thruster architectures available. Finally, the navigation and positioning sensors employed for ROV navigation and control are reviewed. The author has also created a number of comparison tables throughout the review; tables include comparison of wired data transmission technology, comparison of common ROV communication protocols and comparisons of various inertial navigation systems. By the end of the review the reader will have clearer understanding on the fundamentals of inspection-class ROV technologies and can use this as an introduction to further paper investigation.

1 December 2004 in Control Engineering Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EOEdin Omerdic
Edin Omerdic
GRGeoff Roberts
Geoff Roberts

1 April 2003 in Control Engineering Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JVJasmin Velagic
Jasmin Velagic
ZVZoran Vukic
Zoran Vukic
EOEdin Omerdic
Edin Omerdic

1 May 2018 in Control Engineering Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SSSatja Sivčev
Satja Sivčev
MRMatija Rossi
Matija Rossi
JCJoseph Coleman
Joseph Coleman
GDGerard Dooly
Gerard Dooly
EOEdin Omerdic
Edin Omerdic
DTDaniel Toal
Daniel Toal

19 February 2017 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DDDinesh Babu Duraibabu
Dinesh Babu Duraibabu
SPSven Poeggel
Sven Poeggel
EOEdin Omerdic
Edin Omerdic
RCRomano Capocci
Romano Capocci
Elfed LewisElfed Lewis
Elfed Lewis
GDGerard Dooly
Gerard Dooly
A miniature sensor for accurate measurement of pressure (depth) with temperature compensation in the ocean environment is described. The sensor is based on an optical fibre Extrinsic Fabry-Perot interferometer (EFPI) combined with a Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG). The EFPI provides pressure measurements while the Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) provides temperature measurements. The sensor is mechanically robust, corrosion-resistant and suitable for use in underwater applications. The combined pressure and temperature sensor system was mounted on-board a mini remotely operated underwater vehicle (ROV) in order to monitor the pressure changes at various depths. The reflected optical spectrum from the sensor was monitored online and a pressure or temperature change caused a corresponding observable shift in the received optical spectrum. The sensor exhibited excellent stability when measured over a 2 h period underwater and its performance is compared with a commercially available reference sensor also mounted on the ROV. The measurements illustrates that the EFPI/FBG sensor is more accurate for depth measurements (depth of ~0.020 m).