Mehrab Mehrvar

Dr. Mehrab Mehrvar

Chemical Engineering, Toronto Metropolitan University, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

3 August 2004 in Analytical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mehrab MehrvarMehrab Mehrvar
Mehrab Mehrvar
MAMustafe Abdi
Mustafe Abdi
The objective of this study is to analyze the technical importance, performance, techniques, advantages, and disadvantages of the biosensors in general and of the electrochemical biosensors in particular. A product of reaction diffuses to the transducer in the first generation biosensors (based on Clark biosensors). The mediated biosensors or second generation biosensors use specific mediators between the reaction and the transducer to improve sensitivity. The second generation biosensors involve two steps: first, there is a redox reaction between enzyme and substrate that is reoxidized by the mediator, and eventually the mediator is oxidized by the electrode. No normal product or mediator diffusion is directly involved in the third generation biosensors, direct biosensors. Based on the type of transducer, current biosensors are divided into optical, mass, thermal, and electrochemical sensors. They are used in medical diagnostics, food quality controls, environmental monitoring, and other applications. These biosensors are also grouped under two broad categories of sensors: direct and indirect detection systems. Moreover, these systems could be further grouped into continuous or batch operation. Therefore, amperometric biosensors and their current applications are focused on more in detail since they are the most commonly used biosensors in monitoring and diagnosing tests in clinical analysis. Problems related to the commercialization of medical, environmental, and industrial biosensors as well as their performance characteristics, their competitiveness in comparison to the conventional analytical tools, and their costs determine the future development of these biosensors.

25 October 2017 in International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MNM. Nasirian
M. Nasirian
YLY. P. Lin
Y. P. Lin
Ciro Bustillo-LecompteCiro Bustillo-Lecompte
Ciro Bustillo-Lecompte
Mehrab MehrvarMehrab Mehrvar
Mehrab Mehrvar


1 January 2004 in International Journal of Photoenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SVSarah Hatfield Venhuis
Sarah Hatfield Venhuis
Mehrab MehrvarMehrab Mehrvar
Mehrab Mehrvar
Surfactants are depended upon worldwide as cleaning agents. Their usage in such large quantities means that their waste and the potential for pollution are high. Many studies have been done over the last three decades encompassing treatment, alternatives to non‐biodegradable surfactants, and the environmental impact. It has been found that although certain surfactants may not be directly toxic, when their concentrations are high in soil, they can act as agents to release toxic pollutants such as polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The focus of this study is to review recent advances in the toxicology, the environmental fate, and the treatment of selected surfactants. In addition, photolytic and photocatalytic degradation of linear alkylbenzene sulfonate in water is presented.

1 January 2001 in International Journal of Photoenergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Mehrab MehrvarMehrab Mehrvar
Mehrab Mehrvar
William AndersonWilliam Anderson
William Anderson
MMMurray Moo-Young
Murray Moo-Young
Tetrahydrofuran (THF) and 1,4‐dioxane (DIOX) are two common solvents that are found in contaminated groundwater. Photocatalytic degradation of these two organic solvents in water was studied in the presence of carbonate and bicarbonate, which are hydroxyl radical scavengers. The reactions were performed in an annular slurry photoreactor. It was found that bicarbonate and carbonate ions acted as hydroxyl radical scavengers and slowed down the DIOX degradation rate but did not significantly affect the THF degradation rate. The slight enhancement in the THF degradation rate in the presence of sodium bicarbonate may be due to the increase in pH. In addition, it appears that bicarbonate and carbonate ions were reduced to other organic species during the photocatalytic reaction.