Purpose: The CAPTIVATE study investigated first-line ibrutinib plus venetoclax for chronic lymphocytic leukemia in 2 cohorts: minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided randomized discontinuation (MRD cohort) and Fixed Duration (FD cohort). We report outcomes of fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax in patients with high-risk genomic features [del(17p), TP53 mutation, and/or unmutated immunoglobulin heavy chain (IGHV)] in CAPTIVATE. Patients and Methods: Patients received three cycles of ibrutinib 420 mg/day then 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax (5-week ramp-up to 400 mg/day). FD cohort patients (n = 159) received no further treatment. Forty-three MRD cohort patients with confirmed undetectable MRD (uMRD) after 12 cycles of ibrutinib plus venetoclax received randomized placebo treatment. Results: Of 195 patients with known status of genomic risk features at baseline, 129 (66%) had ≥1 high-risk feature. Overall response rates were >95% regardless of high-risk features. In patients with and without high-risk features, respectively, complete response (CR) rates were 61% and 53%; best uMRD rates: 88% and 70% (peripheral blood) and 72% and 61% (bone marrow); 36-month progression-free survival (PFS) rates: 88% and 92%. In subsets with del(17p)/TP53 mutation (n = 29) and unmutated IGHV without del(17p)/TP53 mutation (n = 100), respectively, CR rates were 52% and 64%; uMRD rates: 83% and 90% (peripheral blood) and 45% and 80% (bone marrow); 36-month PFS rates: 81% and 90%. Thirty-six–month overall survival (OS) rates were >95% regardless of high-risk features. Conclusions: Deep, durable responses and sustained PFS seen with fixed-duration ibrutinib plus venetoclax are maintained in patients with high-risk genomic features, with similar PFS and OS to those without high-risk features. See related commentary by Rogers, p. 2561

The implementation of CAR T therapy in the real-world setting is hindered by logistical and financial barriers, impacting timely access to this life-saving treatment. Clinical trials have reported the time from leukapheresis to CAR T cell infusion (vein-to-vein time) but not the time from CAR T referral to infusion (decision-to-vein time). Herein, we report the barriers to CAR T therapy in a real-world setting. We evaluated the factors influencing the decision-to-vein time and explored the association with clinical outcomes in patients with relapsed or refractory DLBCL who received CAR T therapy. We conducted a retrospective study of adult patients with R/R DLBCL who underwent consultation for CAR T cell therapy at Levine Cancer Institute and Wake Forest Comprehensive Cancer Center and collected information regarding demographic data, referral type, insurance type, CAR T product and survival outcomes. The effects of variables on decision-to-vein time were analyzed by Fisher's exact test for categorial variables and Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazard models. The study included 142 patients who were referred for CAR T of which 99 patients received CAR T. Median decision-to-vein time was 62 days compared to median vein-to-vein time of 32 days. Patients with private insurance took longer to obtain financial clearance compared to patients with government insurance (median 25 vs. 9 days, p < .001). Of those with private insurance (n=63), 35% needed a single case agreement (SCA) which led to significant delay in receiving financial clearance (median 50.5 vs.19 days, p < .001) and increased decision-to-vein time (median 75 vs. 55 days, p < .001) compared to those who did not need SCA. Decision-to-vein time was significantly different among various products, clinical trial being the shortest (median 47 days, n = 9) and non-conforming products being the longest (median 94.5 days, n = 6) (p< .001). Axi-cel had the shortest median decision-to-vein time at 61 days compared to 81 days with tisa-cel and 85 days with liso-cel. Although delays in receiving CAR T therapy did not impact survival, the median overall survival for patients who were referred for CAR T therapy but did not receive it, was significantly lower than those who received CAR T cell therapy (9.0 vs. 21.0 months, p < .001). Decision-to-vein time is a major cause of delay in receiving CAR T therapy. SCAs lead to significant increase in 'decision-to-vein' time leading to delays in CAR T therapy in a real-world setting. Patients who were referred for CAR T but are not able to receive it, have inferior survival compared to CAR T recipients. Our findings underscore the significance of addressing administrative hurdles, such as SCAs and insurance approvals, for timely access to CAR T therapy for patients with DLBCL.

7009 Background: The phase 2 CAPTIVATE study evaluated first-line ibrutinib (Ibr) + venetoclax (Ven) for CLL/SLL in 2 cohorts: minimal residual disease (MRD)-guided randomized discontinuation (MRD cohort) and Fixed Duration (FD cohort). Ibr±Ven retreatment was allowed in patients (pts) who had progressive disease (PD). Here, we report outcomes for pts with high-risk genomic features from the FD cohort and retreatment outcomes in pts from the FD cohort and MRD cohort placebo arm. Methods: Pts aged ≤70 y with previously untreated CLL/SLL without restriction on genomic risk factors received 3 cycles of Ibr, then 12 cycles of Ibr+Ven (Ibr, 420 mg/d orally; Ven, 5-wk ramp up to 400 mg/d orally). On-study retreatment included single-agent Ibr (FD cohort or MRD cohort placebo arm); pts with PD >2 y after end of treatment (EOT) could be retreated with FD Ibr+Ven (FD cohort). Results: In the FD cohort (n=159) with a median follow-up of 61.2 mo (range, 0.8–66.3), 5-y PFS and OS rates (95% CI) were 67% (59–74) and 96% (91–98), respectively. 5-y PFS rates were higher in pts with undetectable MRD at 3 mo after EOT in peripheral blood (83%) or bone marrow (84%) vs those without (48% and 50%, respectively). 5-y PFS rates (95% CI) in pts with genomic risk factors were: del(17p)/mutated TP53 41% (21–59), complex karyotype 57% (37–72), del(11q) 64% (30–85), and unmutated IGHV 68% (50–80) (Table). In total, 18 second malignancies occurred in 13 pts (10 events in 8 pts during FD Ibr+Ven, 6 events in 4 pts after EOT and before retreatment, and 2 events in 2 pts during retreatment). Of 202 pts who completed Ibr+Ven (FD cohort, n=159; MRD cohort placebo arm, n=43), 63 have had PD to date; PD occurred >2 y after EOT in 43/63 pts (68%). 32/63 (51%) pts initiated retreatment with Ibr (n=25) or Ibr+Ven (n=7). With a median time on Ibr retreatment of 21.9 mo (range, 0.03–50.4), ORR was 86% in 22 evaluable pts (best response: 1 CR; 1 nodular PR; 17 PR; 2 SD; 1 PD [Richter transformation]). With a median time on Ibr+Ven retreatment of 13.8 mo (range, 3.7–15.1), ORR was 71% in 7 evaluable pts (best response: 1 CR; 4 PR; 1 PR with lymphocytosis; 1 SD). Conclusions: With up to 5.5 y of follow-up, FD Ibr+Ven continues to provide clinically meaningful PFS in pts with high-risk genomic features, as well as in the overall population. Ibr-based retreatment provides promising responses in pts needing subsequent therapy after the all-oral FD regimen of Ibr+Ven. Clinical trial information: NCT02910583 . [Table: see text]

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Significant unmet need remains for patients with relapsed/refractory FL after ≥3 lines of prior therapy. While recent advancements have likely improved the survival of patients with FL, most patients will eventually relapse. The treatment of patients with FL after multiple relapses or those with refractory disease has historically led to lower overall response rates (ORR) and shorter progression-free survival (PFS) with each subsequent line of therapy. New treatments with high ORR and durable PFS are needed in this setting, particularly in patients that progress within 2 years of first line chemoimmunotherapy (POD24) and/or those refractory chemoimmunotherapy. Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies targeting the B-cell antigen CD-19 have shown to be an efficacious treatment option for both heavily pretreated patients and/or patients with refractory FL, resulting in a high ORR and durable remissions.

Purpose: Patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treated with ibrutinib are at risk of developing cardiovascular side effects (CVSE). The molecular determinants of CVSEs have not been fully elucidated. We interrogated genetic polymorphisms in the Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) signaling pathway for their association with ibrutinib-related CVSEs. Experimental Design: We conducted a retrospective/prospective observational pharmacogenetic study of 50 patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed CLL who received ibrutinib at a starting daily dose of 420 mg for at least 6 months. CVSEs, primarily atrial fibrillation and hypertension, occurred in 10 patients (20%), of whom 4 discontinued therapy. DNA was isolated from buccal swabs of all 50 patients and genotyped for 40 SNPs in GATA4, SGK1, KCNQ1, KCNA4, NPPA, and SCN5A using a customized next-generation sequencing panel. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine genetic and clinical factors associated with the incidence of ibrutinib-related CVSEs. Results: GATA4 rs804280 AA (P = 0.043), KCNQ1 rs163182 GG (P = 0.036), and KCNQ1 rs2237895 AA (P = 0.023) genotypes were univariately associated with ibrutinib-related CVSEs. On the basis of multivariate analysis, a high genetic risk score, defined as the presence of at least two of these genotypes, was associated with 11.5-fold increased odds of CVSEs (P = 0.019; 95% confidence interval, 1.79–119.73). Conclusions: Our findings suggest possible genetic determinants of ibrutinib-related CVSEs in CLL. If replicated in a larger study, pretreatment pharmacogenetic testing for GATA4 and KCNQ1 polymorphisms may be a useful clinical tool for personalizing treatment selection for CLL and/or instituting early risk mitigation strategies.