Renata Pacheco Quevedo

Dr. Renata Pacheco Quevedo

Department of Geography and Regional Research, University of Vienna, Vienna, Wien, Austria
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

11Years (2016-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 February 2023 in Landslides
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Renata Pacheco QuevedoRenata Pacheco Quevedo
Renata Pacheco Quevedo
Andrés Danilo Velástegui-MontoyaAndrés Danilo Velástegui-Montoya
Andrés Danilo Velástegui-Montoya
Néstor Montalván-BurbanoNéstor Montalván-Burbano
Néstor Montalván-Burbano
FMFernando Morante
Fernando Morante
OKOliver Korup
Oliver Korup
CRCamilo Rennó
Camilo Rennó
Landslide occurrence has become increasingly influenced by human activities. Accordingly, changing land use and land cover (LULC) is an important conditioning factor in landslide susceptibility models. We present a bibliometric analysis and review of how LULC was explored in the context of landslide susceptibility in 536 scientific articles from 2001 to 2020. The pattern of publications and citations reveals that most articles hardly focus on the relationship between LULC and landslides despite a growing interest in this topic. Most research outputs came from Asian countries (some of which are frequently affected by landslides), and mostly with prominent international collaboration. We recognised three major research themes regarding the characteristics of LULC data, different simulated scenarios of LULC changes, and the role of future scenarios for both LULC and landslide susceptibility. The most frequently studied LULC classes included roads, soils (in the broadest sense), and forests, often to approximate the negative impacts of expanding infrastructure, deforestation, or major land use changes involving agricultural practice. We highlight several articles concerned primarily with current practice and future scenarios of changing land use in the context of landslides. The relevance of LULC in landslide susceptibility analysis is growing slowly, though with much potential to be explored for future LULC scenario analysis and to close gaps in many study areas.

13 February 2023 in Land
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSheela Bhuvanendran Bhagya
Sheela Bhuvanendran Bhagya
SSSumi A S
Sumi A S
SBSankaran Balaji
Sankaran Balaji
JDJean Homian DANUMAH
Jean Homian DANUMAH
Romulus CostacheRomulus Costache
Romulus Costache
Mohamed AbiouiMohamed Abioui
Mohamed Abioui
Landslides are prevalent in the Western Ghats, and the incidences that happened in 2021 in the Koottickal area of the Kottayam district (Western Ghats) resulted in the loss of 10 lives. The objectives of this study are to assess the landslide susceptibility of the high-range local self-governments (LSGs) in the Kottayam district using the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) and fuzzy-AHP (F-AHP) models and to compare the performance of existing landslide susceptible maps. This area never witnessed any massive landslides of this dimension, which warrants the necessity of relooking into the existing landslide-susceptible models. For AHP and F-AHP modeling, ten conditioning factors were selected: slope, soil texture, land use/land cover (LULC), geomorphology, road buffer, lithology, and satellite image-derived indices such as the normalized difference road landslide index (NDRLI), the normalized difference water index (NDWI), the normalized burn ratio (NBR), and the soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). The landslide-susceptible zones were categorized into three: low, moderate, and high. The validation of the maps created using the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) technique ascertained the performances of the AHP, F-AHP, and TISSA maps as excellent, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) value above 0.80, and the NCESS map as acceptable, with an AUC value above 0.70. Though the difference is negligible, the map prepared using the TISSA model has better performance (AUC = 0.889) than the F-AHP (AUC = 0.872), AHP (AUC = 0.867), and NCESS (AUC = 0.789) models. The validation of maps employing other matrices such as accuracy, mean absolute error (MAE), and root mean square error (RMSE) also confirmed that the TISSA model (0.869, 0.226, and 0.122, respectively) has better performance, followed by the F-AHP (0.856, 0.243, and 0.147, respectively), AHP (0.855, 0.249, and 0.159, respectively), and NCESS (0.770, 0.309, and 0.177, respectively) models. The most landslide-inducing factors in this area that were identified through this study are slope, soil texture, LULC, geomorphology, and NDRLI. Koottickal, Poonjar-Thekkekara, Moonnilavu, Thalanad, and Koruthodu are the LSGs that are highly susceptible to landslides. The identification of landslide-susceptible areas using diversified techniques will aid decision-makers in identifying critical infrastructure at risk and alternate routes for emergency evacuation of people to safer terrain during an exigency.

25 November 2021 in Geocarto International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Renata Pacheco QuevedoRenata Pacheco Quevedo
Renata Pacheco Quevedo
DMDaniel Andrade Maciel
Daniel Andrade Maciel
TUTatiana Dias Tardelli Uehara
Tatiana Dias Tardelli Uehara
Matej VojtekMatej Vojtek
Matej Vojtek
CRCamilo Rennó
Camilo Rennó
QPQuoc Bao Pham
Quoc Bao Pham
Most previous studies of landslide susceptibility mapping (LSM) have not contemplated spatial heterogeneity and the commonly used models for LSM are aspatial, which could reduce model performance. Therefore, aiming to evaluate the applicability of spatial algorithms to predict landslide susceptibility, the performance of geographical random forest (GRF) was evaluated, in comparison to random forest (RF) and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost). Based on the results, GRF presented the better performance (AUC = 0.876), followed by RF (AUC = 0.748) and XGBoost (AUC = 0.745). GRF also provided the most suitable susceptibility map. While RF and XGBoost presented almost 50% of the study area as susceptible, the GRF presented more concentrated susceptibility areas spatially, with a reasonable area for moderate (15.55%), high (8.73%) and very-high (2.59%) susceptibility classes. Finally, it can be inferred that spatial assessment may improve model performance, and that spatial models have a great potential for LSM.

1 June 2024 in International Soil and Water Conservation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SHSLIMAN HITOURI
SLIMAN HITOURI
Meriame MohajaneMeriame Mohajane
Meriame Mohajane
Sk Ajim AliSk Ajim Ali
Sk Ajim Ali
Renata Pacheco QuevedoRenata Pacheco Quevedo
Renata Pacheco Quevedo
Thong Nguyen-HuyThong Nguyen-Huy
Thong Nguyen-Huy
Antonietta VarasanoAntonietta Varasano
Antonietta Varasano

13 November 2024 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
DMDaniel Andrade Maciel
Daniel Andrade Maciel
FLFellipe Lousada
Fellipe Lousada
AFAlice Fassoni-Andrade
Alice Fassoni-Andrade
Renata Pacheco QuevedoRenata Pacheco Quevedo
Renata Pacheco Quevedo
CBClaudio Barbosa
Claudio Barbosa
ENEvlyn Novo
Evlyn Novo
In 2023, an intense drought impacted the Amazon basin triggered by climate change and a strong El Niño event, with the Negro River reaching its lowest water level in 120 years. However, the spatiotemporal open water extent (OWE) during this drought remains unclear. This study comprehensively evaluates OWE variability in the central Amazon using Sentinel-1 synthetic aperture radar (SAR) data since 2017. Monthly OWE masks were generated through an empirical threshold classification with accuracy >95%. Overall, the central Amazon experienced a reduction of ∼8% in OWE in the 2023 dry season months (November and December) when compared to monthly-average. However, reductions of up to 80% in OWE were observed in several specific lakes. Our analysis underscores the unprecedented severity of the 2023/2024 drought on rivers and floodplains. Utilizing SAR remote sensing technologies, this study emphasizes the urgent need for proactive conservation measures to safeguard the Amazon’s ecological integrity amid escalating environmental challenges. Monthly water masks from January/2017 to September/2024 are available here: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.12751783.