With the advent of new cellular and targeted therapies, treatment options for relapsed and refractory (r/R) lymphomas have multiplied, and the optimal approach offering the best outcomes remains a matter of passionate debate. High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) is still considered a treatment option for patients with chemosensitive lymphoma when cure is the expected goal. The myeloablative conditioning regimen preceding the stem cell infusion is considered the effective component of this approach. Carmustine (BCNU)-based preparative regimens, such as BEAM and BEAC, are considered the standard of care and have shown efficacy and low nonrelapse mortality (NRM). Comparative studies between conditioning regimens have failed to identify a better option. After a BCNU drug shortage in Canada followed by a steep increase in price, we elected to substitute BCNU for bendamustine (benda) in the preparative regimen. The purpose of this substitution was to improve response while preserving safety and controlling costs. From May 2015 to May 2018, a total of 131 consecutive lymphoma patients received benda-EAM conditioning. These patients were compared with 96 consecutive patients who received BCNU-based conditioning from January 2012 to May 2015. Apart from conditioning, supportive care measures were the same in the 2 groups. Patients receiving benda were older (55.7 years versus 51.1 years; P = .002). The development of grade ≥3 mucositis was more frequent with benda conditioning (39.5% versus 7.8%; P < .001) leading to a greater requirement for parenteral nutrition (48.9% versus 21.9%; P < .001). A transient creatinine increase >1.5 times the upper limit of normal (15.3% versus 4.2%; P < .008) and intensive care unit admission (6.9% versus 1.1%; P < .029) were more frequent with benda; however, there were no between-group differences in cardiac, pulmonary, or liver toxicity and NRM. With a median follow-up of 48 months for the benda group and 60 months for the BCNU group, benda was associated with significantly better progression-free survival (71% versus 61%; P = .040; hazard ratio [HR], 1.6; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.0 to 2.7) and overall survival (86% vs 71%; P = .0066; HR, 2.6; 95% CI, 1.3 to 5.4) compared with BCNU-based conditioning regimens. While novel therapies emerge, our study demonstrates that benda-EAM is safe and effective and should be considered a valid alternative to BCNU conditioning to improve outcomes of patients with chemosensitive r/R lymphomas undergoing ASCT.

One challenge of chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CAR-T) for relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) is achieving disease control during manufacturing. We report real-word outcomes of 100 patients treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel, n = 50) or tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel, n = 50) at our center. Most patients received bridging therapy (BT) with 48 undergoing radiation BT (RBT) and 32 receiving systemic BT (SBT). The best overall response rate (ORR) was 84% (78% complete response (CR)) for axi-cel and 60% (42% CR) for tisa-cel. At a median follow-up of 16 months, 12-month progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 72% and 82% for axi-cel, compared to 35% and 57% for tisa-cel. By the bridging approach, 12-month PFS was 60% with RBT, 59% without BT and 35% with SBT (p = 0.06). Notably, axi-cel patients without lymphoma progression during manufacturing (n = 24) achieved 12-month PFS and OS rates of 91% and 96%, respectively. Axi-cel was associated with more cytokine release syndrome (92% vs. 66%, p = 0.003) and neurotoxicity (all-grade 56% vs. 10%, p < 0.001, grade ≥ 328% vs. 4%, p = 0.002). Multivariate analysis identified RBT as independently associated with improved PFS (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.22–0.96). Pending prospective validation, RBT shows promise for improving CAR-T outcomes in LBCL.

Despite high cure rates with frontline therapy for Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), approximately 30% of patients will relapse or develop primary refractory disease (R/r). Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (autoHSCT) is the standard of care for R/r disease, and allogeneic HSCT (alloHSCT) is a curative option for patients in second relapse. Novel agents are being incorporated for the treatment of R/r HL, such that the optimal timing of transplantation is currently being challenged. In this rapidly evolving field, we sought to offer a Canadian perspective on the optreatment of R/r HL and demonstrate the role and effectiveness of both autoHSCT and alloHSCT for the treatment of R/r HL. This single-center retrospective study examined outcomes in 89 consecutive patients with R/r HL treated with autoHSCT between January 2007 and December 2019. A total of 17 patients underwent alloHSCT either as a tandem auto-allo approach or as salvage therapy. With a median follow-up of 5.0 years, the estimated 5-year PFS and OS for patients undergoing autoHSCT were 57.5% (95% confidence interval [CI], 45.2% to 68.0%) and 81.3% (95% CI, 70.0% to 88.8%), respectively. Corresponding values for patients who underwent alloHSCT were 76.5% (95% CI, 48.8% to 90.4%) and 82.4% (95% CI, 54.7% to 93.9%). Nonrelapse mortality at 0% at 100 days and 9.4% at 5 years post-autoHSCT and 0% and 5.9%, respectively, post-alloHSCT. The cumulative incidence of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) at day +100 was 35.3% (95% CI, 17.7% to 62.3%), and that of chronic GVHD at 1 year was 23.5% (95% CI, 6.9% to 45.8%). Both autoHSCT and alloHSCT provide robust and prolonged disease control New agents should be used as a bridge to improve the curative potential of these definitive cellular therapies.

Multiple myeloma (MM) remains associated with a poor outcome, particularly in patients with advanced disease and high-risk (HR) cytogenetics. To date, the only curative treatment is allogeneic (allo) hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT), but high incidences of graft versus host disease (GVHD), nonrelapse mortality (NRM) and disease progression remain important obstacles. Cord blood (CB) transplantation has been associated with low rates of relapse and chronic (c) GVHD, but its use has declined because of high incidences of infections, severe acute GVHD and high NRM. In other hematologic malignancies, UM171-expanded CB transplants have led to improved outcomes, allowing for the selection of smaller, better HLA-matched units. We aimed to investigate the safety and feasibility of single UM171-expanded single CB unit transplantation in frontline tandem auto/allo HCT for HR/ultra-HR MM patients. Newly diagnosed MM patients ≤ 65 years with an ISS stage II/III and del17p, t^{4, 14}, t^{14, 16}, t^{14, 20}, del1p or +1q, R-ISS 3, ≥ 2 cytogenetic abnormalities, or plasma cell leukemia without a sibling donor and availability of a 5-7/8 matched CB graft with ≥ 0.5 x 10⁵ CD34+/kg and ≥ 1.5 x 10⁷ TNCs/kg were eligible to this phase I/II prospective study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03441958). After induction and autologous HCT, patients received a reduced intensity conditioning regimen and were infused with 7-day UM171-expanded CD34+ cells, along with the lymphocytes contained in the CD34-negative fraction. The primary endpoints were feasibility of UM171 expansion, safety, kinetics of engraftment, incidences and maximum grades of acute and cGVHD at 1 and 2 years, assessment of measurable residual disease (MRD) and quality of life (QoL). Between 05/2018 and 11/2021, 20 patients were enrolled. One patient had an unsuccessful CB expansion with UM171, leaving 19 patients with a median age of 56 years. Median CD34+ cell dose infused after expansion was 4.62 x 10⁶/kg (range: 0.79 to 5.76). Median times to achieve absolute neutrophil counts of 0.1 and 0.5 x 10⁹/L were D+6 and D+10.5; median time to reach ≥ 20 x 10⁹/L platelets was D+36. Full donor chimerism was achieved in all cell lineages by D+120 in recipients of reduced intensity conditioning. Cumulative incidences of grade II-IV, grade III-IV acute GVHD and moderate/severe cGVHD at 12 months were 68.4% (95% CI: 46 to 90), 5.3% (95% CI: 0% to 16%), and 10.5% (95% CI: 0% to 25%), respectively. With a median follow-up of 2.9 years (range: 0.46 to 5.3), cumulative incidences of relapse, PFS, OS and NRM at 3 years were 36.8% (95% CI: 14 to 59), 47.4% (95% CI: 29 to 76), 68.4% (95% CI: 50 to 93) and 15.8% (95%CI: 0 to 33), respectively. Median time to complete immunosuppression discontinuation was D+238. No unexpected adverse events were observed. Only one of 7 patients alive at 2 years with negative MRD at transplant has relapsed. Non-relapsing patients had a QoL after transplant similar to the general population. UM171-expanded CB transplant in HR/ultra-HR myeloma patients is feasible and allows the use of single CB units with a low risk of cGVHD. Patients with negative pretransplant MRD might benefit most from a UM171-expanded CB transplant.

Background: Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (alloHCT) is a curative option for relapsed/refractory B-cell lymphomas (BCLs), but its role in the evolving field of cellular therapy is increasingly unclear as recent advances in transplant procedures have improved outcomes. Methods: This retrospective, single-center study included 55 BCL patients (large B-cell lymphoma—LBCL; indolent BCL; and mantle cell lymphoma—MCL) treated with alloHCT from 2015 to 2023 at Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS); secondary endpoints included NRM and GVHD incidence. Results: A total of 55 patients were included (25 LBCLs, 16 indolent BCLs, 14 MCLs), and 76% of LBCLs were of indolent origin (Richter transformation, transformed follicular lymphoma). After a median follow-up of 6.1, 5.8 and 2.4 years for LBCLs, indolent BCLs and MCLs, their 5-year PFS and OS were 57.2% (IC 95%: 34.2–74.7) and 62.8% (IC 95%: 37.9–80.0), 81.2% (IC 95%: 52.5–93.5) and 93.8% (IC 95%: 63.2–99.1), and 39.0% (IC 95%: 14.3–63.3) and 68.1% (IC 95%: 35.4–86.8), respectively. The 5-year NRM was 16.9% (IC 95%: 8.2–28.3) with a relapse incidence of 23.4%. Overall/grade 3–4 acute GVHD occurred in 43.6% and 18.1% of patients. At 3 years, overall/moderate or severe chronic GVHD incidence was 49% and 34.5%. Conclusions: AlloHCT remains a potentially curative option and should be considered for fit patients with chemosensitive FL or LBCLs of indolent origin and a low comorbidity index.