Purpose: To evaluate the extent to which experienced reviewers can accurately discern between artificial intelligence (AI)–generated and original research abstracts published in the field of shoulder and elbow surgery and compare this with the performance of an AI detection tool. Methods: Twenty‐five shoulder‐ and elbow‐related articles published in high‐impact journals in 2023 were randomly selected. ChatGPT was prompted with only the abstract title to create an AI‐generated version of each The resulting 50 abstracts were randomly distributed to and evaluated by 8 blinded peer reviewers with at least 5 years of experience. Reviewers were tasked with distinguishing between original and AI‐generated text. A Likert scale assessed reviewer confidence for each interpretation, and the primary reason guiding assessment of generated text was collected. AI output detector (0%‐100%) and plagiarism (0%‐100%) scores were evaluated using GPTZero. Results: Reviewers correctly identified 62% of AI‐generated abstracts and misclassified 38% of original abstracts as being AI generated. GPTZero reported a significantly higher probability of AI output among generated abstracts (median, 56%; interquartile range [IQR], 51%‐77%) compared with original abstracts (median, 10%; IQR, 4%‐37%; P < .01). Generated abstracts scored significantly lower on the plagiarism detector (median, 7%; IQR, 5%‐14%) relative to original abstracts (median, 82%; IQR, 72%‐92%; P < .01). Correct identification of AI‐generated abstracts was predominately attributed to the presence of unrealistic data/values. The primary reason for misidentifying original abstracts as AI was attributed to writing style. Conclusions: Experienced reviewers faced difficulties in distinguishing between human and AI‐generated research content within shoulder and elbow surgery. The presence of unrealistic data facilitated correct identification of AI abstracts, whereas misidentification of original abstracts was often ascribed to writing style. Clinical Relevance: With rapidly increasing AI advancements, it is paramount that ethical standards of scientific reporting are upheld. It is therefore helpful to understand the ability of reviewers to identify AI‐generated content.

» Patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) undergoing shoulder arthroplasty (SA) have a unique risk profile, which must be considered by clinicians. » The presence of DM as a comorbidity is associated with longer length of stay following SA, greater likelihood of nonhome discharge, and a higher rate of 90-day readmission. » Though the incidence is low, patients with DM are at an increased risk of serious postoperative cardiovascular complications, such as pulmonary embolism, venous thromboembolism, and myocardial infarction. » DM has generally been associated with increased risk of postoperative infection. The optimal hemoglobin A1c threshold in patients undergoing SA remains inconclusive. When extrapolating from lower limb arthroplasty, the literature indicates that this threshold is most likely in the range of 7.5% to 8%. » Patients with DM are more likely to require revision surgery after SA and report lower postoperative satisfaction.

Study Design: Narrative Review. Objectives: Endoscopic spine surgery is becoming an increasingly popular approach to treat spinal disease due to its minimally invasive nature. Although certain adverse events are well-reported within the literature, there is a scarcity of information for complications that are rare but still potentially serious. The purpose of this study is to describe these rare complications of endoscopic spine surgery and discuss management and prevention strategies. Methods: A search was conducted in PubMed and Embase to review the literature for all adverse events following endoscopic spine surgery, with no restrictions on publication year. Cohort and case report studies describing infrequently reported complications were collected for analysis. Results: A total of 38 studies were included which described rare complications in 93 patients following endoscopic spine surgery. These included neurological events (seizure, pseudomeningocele, pneumocephalus, upper limb palsy), vascular events (hemorrhage, hematoma, arteriovenous fistula), mechanical events (cage migration, guidewire breakage), and additional events (discal pseudocyst, pulmonary edema, arrhythmia, total spinal anesthesia). Conclusions: Endoscopic spine surgery is rapidly evolving and emerging as a popular alternative to conventional approaches. Though regarded as a generally safe form of surgery, it is imperative that surgeons are aware of all complications which may occur, even those that may be infrequently reported in the literature.

Systematic review and meta-analysis. To perform a comprehensive meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes of uniportal versus biportal endoscopic spine surgery across decompression procedures in patients with lumbar degenerative disease (LDD). Uniportal endoscopic spine surgery has been a widely adopted minimally invasive technique, whereas biportal endoscopy has recently emerged as a promising alternative with potential advantages in surgical outcomes. A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Eleven studies encompassing 374 uniportal and 368 biportal patients were included. Outcomes analyzed were Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, complication rates, operative time, and length of hospital stay. Biportal endoscopic surgery was associated with a significantly lower ODI at 1-3 months and at final follow-up compared with uniportal surgery. However, uniportal discectomy demonstrated significantly shorter operative time and length of hospital stay than biportal discectomy. No significant differences were observed between approaches in terms of VAS scores, complication rates, or ODI at other time points. Both uniportal and biportal endoscopic spine surgeries yield comparable postoperative outcomes in LDD. Although biportal surgery showed a modest advantage in ODI improvement, it did not reach the minimal clinically important difference. Uniportal surgery demonstrated greater efficiency in terms of operative time and recovery, particularly for discectomy procedures.

Background/Objectives: Mixed martial arts (MMA) is a combat sport which heavily involves upper limb strength, mobility, and stability. Shoulder injuries, given their impact on striking and grappling, may significantly hinder performance and career longevity. However, their specific effects on competitive outcomes remain poorly defined. This study evaluates return-to-sport rates, fight performance, and long-term success in professional MMA athletes following shoulder injuries. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted using publicly available databases to identify professional MMA fighters from the UFC, Bellator, and Strikeforce who sustained shoulder injuries requiring withdrawal from scheduled bouts. Fighter demographics, injury characteristics, and treatment approaches were recorded. Performance metrics—including winning percentage, takedown (TD), knockdown (KD), and significant strike (SS) rates—were compared before and after injury. Independent t-tests were used, and significance was set at p < 0.05. Results: A total of 27 fighters with 34 documented shoulder injuries were included. The most common injury was a torn labrum (41.2%), with 76.5% requiring surgical intervention. Aggregate winning rates significantly declined from 81.96% pre-injury to 54.7% post-injury (p < 0.001). Aggregate KD rates also dropped significantly (p < 0.001), while TD rates trended downward without reaching statistical significance. SS rates remained stable, suggesting potential compensatory mechanisms. Injury recurrence was observed in 22.2% of cases. Conclusions: Shoulder injuries in MMA are associated with a substantial decline in competitive success, particularly in knockout capability, emphasizing the critical role of shoulder integrity in fight performance. The high recurrence rate suggests the need for optimized rehabilitation protocols and stricter return-to-sport guidelines to enhance fighter longevity.