Background: Interscalene brachial plexus blockade (ISBPB) is an effective anesthetic technique for shoulder arthroplasty; however, “rebound pain” can increase the patient’s postoperative pain experience and narcotic usage. Exparel (liposomal bupivacaine) injected into the soft tissues at the surgical site has theoretical efficacy for up to 72 hours after administration. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative pain scores and narcotic consumption following shoulder arthroplasty performed with either ISBPB alone or ISBPB and intraoperative Exparel. Methods: Seventy-eight patients undergoing primary shoulder arthroplasty were randomized to receive an ISBPB with Exparel (39 patients) or without Exparel (39 patients). The primary outcome variable was morphine equivalent units (MEUs) consumed over the first 24 hours after surgery. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative narcotic administration and visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain (at 0, 8, 16, 24, 48, and 72 hours after surgery). Results: There were no significant demographic differences between the ISBPB and ISBPB + Exparel groups. Total narcotic consumption over the first 24 hours after surgery was significantly lower in the ISBPB group compared with the ISBPB + Exparel group (mean and standard deviation, 18.9 ± 25.6 MEU versus 35.3 ± 36.7 MEU, p = 0.009). VAS pain scores did not differ significantly between groups at any time point during the first 72 hours after surgery. Conclusions: Patients treated with Exparel required significantly more postoperative narcotics and demonstrated no significant reduction in pain scores over the first 72 hours after primary shoulder arthroplasty. Exparel does not appear to have substantial value when added to a pain protocol that includes an ISBPB. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level l. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Background: A subacromial balloon spacer is an option to treat irreparable rotator cuff tears. We hypothesized that the balloon would restore glenohumeral contact pressure, the acromion-humeral interval, and deltoid load to intact values after a simulated irreparable supraspinatus tear in a cadaveric model. Methods: Fourteen cadaveric shoulders (mean age at the time of death, 67.9 years) were tested using a custom test frame. In this frame, glenohumeral contact pressure, the acromion-humeral interval, and deltoid load were measured using a digital sensor, a MicroScribe, and a spring scale, respectively. Test conditions included the intact shoulder, a small supraspinatus tear, supraspinatus repair, repair plus balloon, an irreparable supraspinatus tear (rotator cable-insufficient), and an irreparable tear plus balloon. Load was applied in a simulated neutral arm position (balanced) and active shoulder abduction (unbalanced). Results: When the balloon was inflated over the irreparable supraspinatus tear in the balanced condition, glenohumeral contact pressure increased by 122% (p = 0.006) compared with that for the irreparable tear at 0° of abduction and by 94% (p = 0.046) at 60°. In the unbalanced condition, pressure decreased in the irreparable tear condition after the balloon was inflated, restoring pressure to close to that in the intact state. The balloon did not restore glenohumeral contact area to that in the intact shoulder in either the balanced or the unbalanced condition. The irreparable tear displaced the humeral head superiorly in the unbalanced condition, decreasing the acromion-humeral interval. The balloon moved the head inferiorly by a mean (and standard error of the mean) of 6.2 ± 1.3 mm (p < 0.001) at 0° of abduction, 4.4 ± 1.3 mm (p < 0.001) at 30°, and 3.0 ± 0.8 mm (p < 0.001) at 60°. The balloon increased the deltoid load after an irreparable tear by 8.2% (p = 0.022) at 0°, 12.6% (p = 0.002) at 30°, and 11.1% (p = 0.008) at 60°. Conclusions: In a cadaveric model of an irreparable supraspinatus tear, a balloon spacer restored intact-state glenohumeral contact pressures at most abduction angles, lowered the humeral head, and increased deltoid load at postoperative time 0. Clinical Relevance: This study supports further investigation of the balloon spacer in comparative clinical studies of surgical options for irreparable rotator cuff tears, with clinically relevant evaluation measures and observation periods.

ChatGPT is an artificial intelligence (AI) language processing model that uses deep learning to generate human-like responses to natural language inputs. Its potential use in health care has raised questions and several studies have assessed its effectiveness in writing articles, clinical reasoning, and solving complex questions. This study aims to investigate ChatGPT's capabilities and implications in diagnosing and managing patients with new shoulder and elbow complaints in a private clinical setting to provide insights into its potential use as a diagnostic tool for patients and a first consultation resource for primary physicians. In a private clinical setting, patients were assessed by ChatGPT after being seen by a shoulder and elbow specialist for shoulder and elbow symptoms. To be assessed by the AI model, a research fellow filled out a standardized form (including age, gender, major comorbidities, symptoms and the localization, natural history, and duration, any associated symptoms or movement deficit, aggravating/relieving factors, and x-ray/imaging report if present). This form was submitted through the ChatGPT portal and the AI model was asked for a diagnosis and best management modality. A total of 29 patients with 15 males and 14 females, were included in this study. The AI model was able to correctly choose the diagnosis and management in 93% (27/29) and 83% (24/29) of the patients, respectively. Furthermore, of the remaining 24 patients that were managed correctly, ChatGPT did not specify the appropriate management in 6 patients and chose only one management in 5 patients, where both were applicable and dependent on the patient’s choice. Therefore, 55% of ChatGPT’s management was poor. ChatGPT made a worthy opponent; however, it will not be able to replace in its current form a shoulder and elbow specialist in diagnosing and treating patients for many reasons such as misdiagnosis, poor management, lack of empathy and interactions with patients, its dependence on magnetic resonance imaging reports, and its lack of new knowledge.