Objectives: Anterior crowding in the lower jaw is a common orthodontic issue often managed through premolar extraction, which can affect facial profile development. This study aimed to evaluate skeletal and dental changes in moderate to severe crowding using a novel mandibular reference line—the Ramus Anterior Vertical (RaV)—to support treatment planning. Methods: A total of 140 patients (LII > 4 mm and < 9 mm; mean age ≈ 12.5 years) were divided into two groups (G1: extraction; G2: nonextraction; total n = 140; n = 70 per group). Skeletal and dental parameters were measured before (T0) and after (T1) orthodontic treatment using 280 lateral cephalograms. RaV was defined as a vertical line through the anterior ramus point, perpendicular to the occlusal plane. Results: Sagittal measurements relative to RaV were reproducible and unaffected by mandibular mobility. Significant vertical skeletal changes were observed in G2 females, with an increased anterior facial height (N–Sp′ and Sp′–Gn) but a stable Hasund Index. In G1, the dental arch length and distances from RaV to i5 and i6 were reduced, while second molars (i7) remained stable. Sagittal incisor axis changes (L1–NB°, SAi1°) and skeletal–dental correlations (ML–NSL, Gn–tGo–Ar) were present only in G1. Conclusions: RaV proved to be a stable mandibular reference for assessing treatment effects. In this study, premolar extraction vs. nonextraction was comparably effective, though some vertical skeletal adaptations, especially in G2 females, took place.

The complex three-dimensional organisation of the human brain, as well as the numerous variables involved in modern imaging techniques, make it necessary to introduce guidelines for the interpretation of the topographical localisation and allocation of normal cerebral structures and pathological processes. In a historical overview of the methods used for precise localisation we introduce some models that can be used as diagnostic aids. As supporting means in the MRI we suggest the standardisation of the imaging by application of this model. The methodological procedures of its use in the MRI are shown in detail. Finally the advantages and disadvantages of this model are discussed with regard to its possible applications in imaging systems such as MR. The imaging standards for intra-interindividual and inter-methodologic comparison in routine investigations are emphasized in particular.