Nodal skip metastasis is a prognostic factor in some sites of malignancies, but its role in esophageal cancer is still unclear. The present study aimed to investigate occurrence and effect of nodal skip metastases in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. All 578 patients undergoing esophagectomy for thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma at the Center for Esophageal Diseases located in Padova between January 1992 and December 2010 were retrospectively evaluated. Selection criteria were R0 resection, pathological M0 stage and pathological lymph node involvement. Patients receiving neoadjuvant therapy were excluded. The selection identified 88 patients with lymph node involvement confirmed by pathological evaluation. Sixteen patients (18.2%) had nodal skip metastasis. Adjusting for the number of lymph node metastases, patient with nodal skip metastasis had similar 5-year overall survival (14% vs. 13%, p = 0.93) and 5-year disease free survival (14% vs. 9%, p = 0.48) compared to patients with both peritumoral and distant lymph node metastases. The risk difference of nodal skip metastasis was: −24.1% (95% C.I. -43.1% to −5.2%) in patients with more than one lymph node metastasis compared to those with one lymph node metastasis; −2.3% (95% C.I. -29.8% to 25.2%) in middle thoracic esophagus and −23.0% (95% C.I. -47.8% to 1.8%) in lower thoracic esophagus compared to upper thoracic esophagus; 18.1% (95% C.I. 3.2% to 33.0%) in clinical N0 stage vs. clinical N+ stage. Nodal skip metastasis is a common pattern of metastatic lymph involvement in thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. However, neither overall survival nor disease free survival are associated with nodal skip metastasis occurrence.

Background/Objectives: Accurate and accessible perioperative health information empowers patients and enhances recovery outcomes. Artificial intelligence tools, such as ChatGPT, have garnered attention for their potential in health communication. This study evaluates the accuracy and readability of responses generated by ChatGPT to questions commonly asked about breast cancer. Methods: Fifteen simulated patient queries about breast cancer surgery preparation and recovery were prepared. Responses generated by ChatGPT (4o version) were evaluated for accuracy by a pool of breast surgeons using a 4-point Likert scale. Readability was assessed with the Flesch–Kincaid Grade Level (FKGL). Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the findings. Results: Of the 15 responses evaluated, 11 were rated as “accurate and comprehensive”, while 4 out of 15 were deemed “correct but incomplete”. No responses were classified as “partially incorrect” or “completely incorrect”. The median FKGL score was 11.2, indicating a high school reading level. While most responses were technically accurate, the complexity of language exceeded the recommended readability levels for patient-directed materials. Conclusions: The model shows potential as a complementary resource for patient education in breast cancer surgery, but should not replace direct interaction with healthcare providers. Future research should focus on enhancing language models’ ability to generate accessible and patient-friendly content.

Background/Objectives: Male breast cancer (MBC) is a rare malignancy with a globally rising incidence. Due to the paucity of specific evidence, therapeutic strategies are often extrapolated from female breast cancer guidelines. The quality of life (QoL) among MBC patients remains underexplored. Methods: This single-institution retrospective study analyzed male patients who underwent surgery for newly diagnosed breast cancer at our institution from 1998 to 2020. The primary aim was to assess QoL after surgical and medical treatments using a newly developed 12-item dedicated questionnaire. Clinicopathological features were recorded, and oncological and survival outcomes were evaluated, with a specific focus on identifying factors influencing QoL. Results: A total of 109 consecutive MBC patients who underwent surgery were included, with 96.3% undergoing total mastectomy. The median global QoL score was 28.5 out of 36, where scores above 24 indicated a low impact of BC treatments on QoL. Multivariate analyses identified adjuvant chemotherapy (p < 0.001) and postoperative complications (p < 0.001) as significant predictors of poorer QoL. Patients reported significantly lower scores on medical treatment-related items compared to surgery-related items (p < 0.001). The 10-year overall survival rate was 79.1%, with a 10-year BC-specific mortality of 3.5%. Advanced age, higher stage disease, and receiving adjuvant chemotherapy were independently associated with poorer overall survival. Conclusions: Despite elevated mastectomy rates, MBC patients self-reported high levels of satisfaction with their treatment outcomes. Medical therapies showed a more pronounced negative impact on QoL than surgery. These findings provide novel insights into the QoL of MBC patients, highlighting the need for future prospective studies and tailored treatments.