Background/Objectives: Giant Retroperitoneal Liposarcomas (giant RPLs) represent a rare malignant disease of adulthood that does not yet have a univocal definition in the scientific literature. The symptoms may be late, depending on the position and the size reached. The weight may exceed 20 kg, and the diameter 25 cm. The main treatment is the surgical approach. This systematic review aims to collect data from the present literature and to answer some questions on the nature of this pathology. Methods: We performed a search on the PubMed, Cochrane, and Scopus databases using specific search strings. Non-English written articles and abstracts were excluded. Results: Dimensional, histological, and pathological data of giant RPLs were extracted and recorded in an electronic database, and charts were used to synthesize the results. We selected 126 manuscripts, all case reports and case series, and obtained data for 157 giant RPLs. The major axis varied from 15 to 80 cm, and the weight ranged between 2.5 and 98 kg. Sex distribution was homogenous. Age was reported 146 times, and almost 1/3 of the study population was under 50 years old. The most frequent hystotype reported was well-differentiated liposarcomas, while the rarest was pleomorphic liposarcomas. In 139 cases, the symptoms were reported and generally included a mass effect on surrounding organs. The exclusive surgical operation was the most frequent treatment option, and it included both the resection of the tumor and other organs involved. Chemo- and radiotherapy were also performed, in a few cases. In 36 reports, distant metastasis was suspected, but only 6 were effectively positive. Conclusions: Giant RPLs are a clinical entity that shares some common features with normal-size liposarcomas but are different in dimensions, age distribution, histologic prevalence, rate of incidental diagnosis, organ sparing, and R0 resection. More studies are needed to completely characterize these tumors.

Genomic score testing is increasingly being integrated into the management of prostate cancer (PCa) to overcome the limitations of traditional clinical and pathological parameters. Genomic tools will represent essential components of precision medicine, supporting risk stratification, therapeutic decision-making, and personalized screening strategies. Genomic score tests can be broadly classified into two main categories: polygenic risk scores (PRSs) and tumor-derived genomic classifiers (GCs). While not yet standard in routine practice, several international guidelines recommend their selective use when results are likely to impact clinical management. PRSs estimate an individual’s susceptibility to PCa based on the cumulative effect of multiple low-penetrance germline genetic variants. These scores show promise in enhancing early detection strategies and identifying men at higher genetic risk who may benefit from tailored screening protocols. Tumor-based GCs assays provide prognostic information that complements conventional clinical and pathological parameters, and are used to guide treatment decisions, including eligibility for active surveillance (AS) or adjuvant therapy after treatment of the primary tumor. This review summarizes and analyzes the current evidence on genomic testing in PCa, with a focus on the available assays, their clinical applications, and their predictive and prognostic value across the disease spectrum. When integrated with clinical and pathological parameters, these tools have the potential to significantly enhance personalized care and should be increasingly considered in routine clinical practice.

Purpose of Review: In approximately 10–15% of patients with prostate cancer (PCa), pathological lymph node metastases (pN1) are detected at radical prostatectomy (RP). The aim of this review is to describe the various treatment options for pN1 patients, with a focus on the most recent evidence reported in the literature. Evidence Synthesis: Due to the lack of prospective studies, several retrospective analyses were conducted according to different types of treatment. Most common strategies are represented by observation plus early salvage radiotherapy (RT) in case of PSA rising, adjuvant androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) alone, or adjuvant RT with or without ADT. Patients with pN1 disease and favorable disease characteristics (lower T stage and ISUP ≤ 2 at RP, 3) were detected at RP. Lastly, few studies analyzed the rate of adverse events following adjuvant ADT or RT, leaving the issue of treatment-related side effects still open. Summary: There is no clearly established standard of care for men with pN1 PCa, and disease characteristics should guide the choice of optimal post-operative management for these patients. Prospective data and clinical trials are clearly needed to define the most effective therapeutic strategy.

Background: Esophageal achalasia increasingly affects elderly patients, in whom frailty and comorbidity complicate management and heighten procedural risk. Minimally invasive Heller–Dor myotomy remains the reference surgical treatment, while the advent of robotics has renewed interest in its potential advantages. Whether these refinements translate into meaningful benefits for older adults remains unclear. This gap is clinically significant given the distinct physiological vulnerabilities of older adults. Methods: A narrative review of the literature was conducted to examine current evidence on robotic Heller–Dor myotomy for achalasia, with specific focus on its applicability in elderly and frail patients. Comparative studies between robotic and laparoscopic approaches were analyzed and integrated with available data on achalasia management in older individuals. Results: Robotic Heller–Dor myotomy demonstrates equivalent efficacy to laparoscopic surgery, with reduced mucosal perforation rates, improved ergonomics, and comparable operative times once the learning curve is achieved. However, no published series has specifically analyzed outcomes in geriatric cohorts. Available evidence from laparoscopic studies confirms that surgery remains safe and effective in geriatric patients, suggesting that the precision of robotics could potentially further enhance safety and recovery in this subgroup. Conclusions: Robotic Heller–Dor myotomy represents a promising evolution of minimally invasive therapy for achalasia, potentially aligning technological refinements with the physiological needs of older adults. Prospective studies incorporating frailty assessment, patient-centered outcomes, and cost analyses are required to determine its true value and guide evidence-based use in the aging population.