Background: Tuberculosis (TB) and diabetes mellitus (DM) comorbidity (TB-DM) presents a significant global health challenge, with diabetes increasing susceptibility to TB, worsening clinical outcomes, and impairing immune responses. Among these dysfunctions, macrophages—the primary immune cells responsible for pathogen recognition, phagocytosis, and bacterial clearance—exhibit profound alterations in TB-DM. However, the complex interplay between metabolic dysregulation, immune impairment, and macrophage dysfunction remains poorly defined. Objective: This scoping review systematically maps the literature on macrophage dysfunction in TB-DM, identifying key immunological impairments affecting phagocytosis, cytokine production, antigen presentation, macrophage polarisation, reactive oxygen species (ROS) and nitric oxide (NO) regulation, and chronic inflammation. Methods: A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase, covering studies from 2014 to 2024. Inclusion criteria focused on human studies investigating macrophage-specific mechanisms in TB-DM. Data extraction and synthesis were performed using Covidence, with findings grouped into key immunological themes. Results: A total of 44 studies were included, revealing significant impairments in macrophage function in TB-DM. Findings indicate reduced NO production, variable ROS dysregulation, altered M1/M2 polarisation, defective antigen presentation, and chronic inflammation. Elevated IL-10 and VEGF were associated with immune suppression and granuloma destabilisation, while eicosanoids (PGE2, LXA4) contributed to sustained inflammation. Conclusions: Macrophage dysfunction emerges as a central driver of immune failure in TB-DM, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of inflammation, immune exhaustion, and bacterial persistence. Understanding these mechanisms is essential for developing biomarker-driven diagnostics, host-directed therapies, targeted immunomodulation, and improving TB outcomes in diabetic populations. Future research should explore macrophage-targeted interventions to enhance immune function and mitigate TB-DM burden.

Background: The BCG vaccine has long been hypothesised to have non-specific protective effects, and early epidemiological studies on COVID-19 suggested a possible protective effect against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity. This systematic review and meta-analysis assesses the effect of the BCG vaccine on preventing severe COVID-19 disease, based on the rate of hospitalisation for COVID-19 related disease. Methods: We performed a literature search of randomised control trials comparing BCG vaccine to placebo in adult participants using EMBASE, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. A random effects model was used to generate summary estimates. Risk of bias was assessed regarding randomisation, allocation sequence concealment, blinding, incomplete outcome data, selective outcome reporting, and other biases. Results: We included 11 studies involving 18,412 participants, reporting COVID-19 incidence. The hospitalisation rate was sought from the authors of papers that did not report on this statistic. There was no significant reduction in COVID-19-related hospitalisation across all studies (relative risk 0.85, 0.51–1.40, p = 0.335), COVID-19 incidence across all studies (relative risk 1.07, 0.94–1.21, p = 0.264), deaths reported in six studies (relative risk 0.67, 0.36–1.26, p = 0.733), and COVID-19-related critical care admissions reported in four studies (relative risk 0.43, 0.13–1.46, p = 0.746). Conclusions: The findings from this meta-analysis, involving a large number of participants, suggest no protective effect of BCG vaccination against severe COVID-19 outcomes or overall SARS-CoV-2 incidence. Further research may be needed to explore the potential non-specific effects of BCG vaccination in other specific populations and against other infections.

This clinical case highlights the diagnostic challenges encountered in a young adult smoker presenting with undifferentiated pulmonary nodules. Initial investigations were inconclusive, necessitating surgical lung biopsy due to the nodules' size and location. The histopathological examination revealed pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis (PLCH). This emphasizes the importance of considering PLCH in the differential diagnosis of pulmonary nodules, particularly in smokers. Moreover, it underscores the value of surgical biopsy in cases where other diagnostic techniques are limited. Early recognition and accurate diagnosis are crucial for optimal management and outcomes in PLCH.