Natalie Emilia Stevens

Dr. Natalie Emilia Stevens

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 March 2014 in ACS Macro Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KLKatherine E. S. Locock
Katherine E. S. Locock
Thomas D.  MichlThomas D. Michl
Thomas D. Michl
NSNatalie Emilia Stevens
Natalie Emilia Stevens
JHJohn Hayball
John Hayball
Krasimir VasilevKrasimir Vasilev
Krasimir Vasilev
MHMatthias Haeussler
Matthias Haeussler

19 July 2017 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNatalie Emilia Stevens
Natalie Emilia Stevens
MCMarianne J. Chapman
Marianne J. Chapman
CFCara K. Fraser
Cara K. Fraser
TKTim R. Kuchel
Tim R. Kuchel
JHJohn Hayball
John Hayball
KDKerrilyn R Diener
Kerrilyn R Diener
Sepsis remains a significant health burden and a major clinical need exists for therapeutics to dampen the excessive and uncontrolled immune activation. Nuclear protein high mobility group box protein 1 (HMGB1) is released following cell death and is a late mediator in sepsis pathogenesis. While approaches targeting HMGB1 have demonstrated reduced mortality in pre-clinical models of sepsis, the impact of HMGB1 blockade on the complex septic inflammatory milieu and the development of subsequent immunosuppression remain enigmatic. Analysis of plasma samples obtained from septic shock patients established an association between increased HMGB1 and non-survival, higher APACHE II scores, and increased pro-inflammatory cytokine responses. Pre-clinically, administration of neutralising ovine anti-HMGB1 polyclonal antibodies improved survival in murine endotoxaemia and caecal ligation and puncture-induced sepsis models, and altered early cytokine profiles to one which corresponded to patterns observed in the surviving patient cohort. Additionally, anti-HMGB1 treated murine sepsis survivors were significantly more resistant to secondary bacterial infection and exhibited altered innate immune cell phenotypes and cytokine responses. These findings demonstrate that anti-HMGB1 antibodies alter inflammation in murine sepsis models and reduce sepsis mortality without potentiating immunosuppression.

16 June 2014 in Polymer Chemistry
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Thomas D.  MichlThomas D. Michl
Thomas D. Michl
KLKatherine E. S. Locock
Katherine E. S. Locock
NSNatalie Emilia Stevens
Natalie Emilia Stevens
JHJohn Hayball
John Hayball
Krasimir VasilevKrasimir Vasilev
Krasimir Vasilev
HGHans Griesser
Hans Griesser
Antimicrobial polymers as mimics of natural antimicrobial peptides are emerging as an alternative to classic antibiotics due to their potency, selectivity and lower susceptibility to resistance. The key chemical aspects necessary to confer high activity and selectivity to the polymer chain composition are largely known. However, little attention has been paid to how end-groups affect the overall biological activity. Here we report the use of RAFT polymerization to obtain eight well-defined cationic methacrylate polymers which bear either amine (PA1–4) or guanidine (PG1–4) pendant groups, while systematically varying the R- and Z-RAFT end-groups. These polymers were assessed in haemotoxicity assays as well as antimicrobial testing against clinically relevant pathogens; such as a vigorously biofilm forming strain of Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) and a vancomycin and methicillin resistant strain of Staphylococcus aureus (VISA) as well as the opportunistic fungus Candida albicans (C. albicans). The R-group was found to dominate the measured toxicity of polymers. Replacement of the anionic cyanovaleric acid R-group (PA1) with the neutral isobutyronitrile (PA3) led to over a 20 fold increase in the haemolytic activity of the polymers. The Z-group, however, was found to have more influence on the antimicrobial activity of the polymers against both VISA and C. albicans, whereby polymers with a long, lipophilic dodecylsulfanyl Z-group (PA1) were found to be more potent than those with either an ethylsulfanyl or no ZCS2-group. These results indicate that chemical control over the end-groups is a key element for achieving the desired high biological activity and selectivity, particularly when low molecular weights are required for maximum antibacterial activity.

20 November 2014 in Clinical Endocrinology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MNM.A. Nenke
M.A. Nenke
WRW. Rankin
W. Rankin
MCM.J. Chapman
M.J. Chapman
NSNatalie Emilia Stevens
Natalie Emilia Stevens
KDKerrilyn R Diener
Kerrilyn R Diener
DTD.J. Torpy
D.J. Torpy

8 December 2021 in Cell Reports Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SBStephen J. Blake
Stephen J. Blake
JJJane James
Jane James
FRFeargal Ryan
Feargal Ryan
José Caparros-MartinJosé Caparros-Martin
José Caparros-Martin
GEGeorgina L. Eden
Georgina L. Eden
DLDavid Lynn
David Lynn
Immune agonist antibodies (IAAs) are promising immunotherapies that target co-stimulatory receptors to induce potent anti-tumor immune responses, particularly when combined with checkpoint inhibitors. Unfortunately, their clinical translation is hampered by serious dose-limiting, immune-mediated toxicities, including high-grade and sometimes fatal liver damage, cytokine release syndrome (CRS), and colitis. We show that the immunotoxicity, induced by the IAAs anti-CD40 and anti-CD137, is dependent on the gut microbiota. Germ-free or antibiotic-treated mice have significantly reduced colitis, CRS, and liver damage following IAA treatment compared with conventional mice or germ-free mice recolonized via fecal microbiota transplant. MyD88 signaling is required for IAA-induced CRS and for anti-CD137-induced, but not anti-CD40-induced, liver damage. Importantly, antibiotic treatment does not impair IAA anti-tumor efficacy, alone or in combination with anti-PD1. Our results suggest that microbiota-targeted therapies could overcome the toxicity induced by IAAs without impairing their anti-tumor activity.

14 May 2019 in Frontiers in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NSNatalie Emilia Stevens
Natalie Emilia Stevens
ACAllison Cowin
Allison Cowin
Zlatko KopeckiZlatko Kopecki
Zlatko Kopecki
One of the most important functions of the skin besides regulating internal body temperature includes formation of the barrier between the organism and the external environment, hence protecting against pathogen invasion, chemical and physical assaults and unregulated loss of water and solutes. Disruption of the protective barrier is observed clinically in blisters and erosions of the skin that form in autoimmune blistering diseases where the body produces autoantibodies against structural proteins of the epidermis or the epidermal-dermal junction. Although there is no cure for autoimmune skin blistering diseases, immune suppressive therapies currently available offer opportunities for disease management. In cases where no treatment is sought, these disorders can lead to life threatening complications and current research efforts have focused on developing therapies that target autoantibodies which contribute to disease symptoms. This review will outline the involvement of the skin barrier in main skin-specific autoimmune blistering diseases by describing the mechanisms underpinning skin autoimmunity and review current progress in development of novel therapeutic approaches targeting the underlying causes of autoimmune skin blistering diseases.