Background/Objectives: The International Organization for Standardization (ISO) 20776-2:2021, which replaces ISO 20776-2:2007, focuses solely on the performance of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) assays, emphasizing the ISO 20776-1 broth microdilution method as the reference standard. Consequently, categorical agreement (CA) and associated errors should not be applied. We verified the Vitek Reveal AST assay according to both ISO 20776-2:2021 and ISO 20776-2:2007 criteria. Methods: Samples from 100 simulated and clinical Gram-negative (GN) positive blood cultures (PBCs) were tested at a large teaching hospital. The simulated GN-PBCs were obtained from a hospital collection of isolates selected to represent diverse antimicrobial resistance profiles. The Reveal assay results were compared with those from the reference assay, and the time to result (TTR) for the Reveal assay was calculated. Results: The essential agreement rates were 96.1% (816/849) for simulated and 98.8% (929/940) for clinical GN-PBC samples. The bias values were −3.1 for simulated and −11.0 for clinical samples. The CA rates were 97.7% (808/827) for simulated and 99.2% (924/931) for clinical samples. The mean TTR ± SD (hours) for resistant organisms was significantly lower (4.40 ± 1.15) than that for susceptible, increased exposure (5.52 ± 0.48) and susceptible (5.54 ± 0.49) organisms. Conclusions: Our findings reinforce the potential of the Reveal assay as a valuable tool and support its implementation in clinical microbiology laboratories.
The aim of this study was to compare the Candida bromcresol green (BCG) medium with the chromogenic (CHROM) Brilliance Candida agar and Sabouraud dextrose agar (SDA) media in regard to their capability of detecting Candida isolates from mono- or dual-species cultures. We prepared Candida isolates’ suspensions to obtain mono-species (n = 18) or dual-species (n = 153) culture plates per each medium, and three readers independently observed 513 plates at 24-h, 48-h and 72-h incubation time. We scored reading results as correct, over or under detection compared to the expected species number(s). BCG showed significantly higher correct-detection and lower under-detection rates for all Candida species when observed by at least one reader. At 24-h reading, 12 mono-species cultures had correct (or over) detections in all media, whereas 106, 60 and 78 dual-species cultures had correct (or over) detections in BCG, CHROM or SDA, respectively. BCG provides the basis for an accurate laboratory diagnosis of Candida infections.
Background/Objectives: The global spread of carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) warrants collaborative action. Guidance should come from integrated One Health surveillance; however, a surveillance strategy is currently unavailable due to insufficient knowledge on the sources and transmission routes of CRPA. The aim of the SAMPAN study (“A Smart Surveillance Strategy for Carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa”) is to develop a globally applicable surveillance strategy. Methods: First, an international cross-sectional study will be conducted to investigate CRPA in clinical and environmental settings in Rotterdam (The Netherlands), Rome (Italy), and Jakarta (Indonesia). Screening cultures and risk factor questionnaires will be taken from healthy individuals and patients upon hospital admission. Clinical CRPA isolates will also be included. Additionally, samples will be taken twice from wet hospital environments and monthly from the hospitals’ (drinking) water system, hospital and municipal wastewater treatment plants, and receiving rivers. Whole-genome sequencing will be performed to characterize CRPA isolates and determine the genetic relatedness among the isolates from different reservoirs. Findings from the cross-sectional study, combined with expert elicitation using a Delphi method, will serve as the input for the surveillance strategy. Conclusions: The SAMPAN study will provide a broader understanding of the sources and transmission routes of CRPA. Therewith, the development of a globally applicable smart surveillance strategy will be made possible, delivering information that is needed to guide actions against the spread of CRPA.
This study aimed to assess the comparability of in vitro susceptibility testing methods to ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) and ceftolozane-tazobactam (C/T). Meropenem-resistant and/or carbapenemase-producing clinical isolates of Enterobacterales (Enterobacteriaceae) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were tested by both bioMérieux ETEST and VITEK-2 AST-N397 card and compared with a Micronaut AST-system broth microdilution (BMD) method. CZA and C/T MICs were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints. Of the 153 Enterobacteriaceae isolates, 55.6% and 0.0% (VITEK 2) and 56.9% and 0.0% (ETEST and BMD) were susceptible to CZA and C/T, respectively. Of 52 P. aeruginosa isolates, 50.0% and 40.4% (VITEK 2, ETEST, and BMD) were susceptible to CZA and C/T, respectively. The essential agreement (EA) was 96.1% (197/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 95.6% (196/205; ETEST versus BMD) for CZA testing, whereas EA was 98.0% (201/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 96.6% (198/205; ETEST versus BMD) for C/T testing. The categorical agreement (CA) was 98.0% (201/205; VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 100% (ETEST versus BMD) for CZA testing, whereas CA was 100% (VITEK 2 versus BMD) and 100% (ETEST versus BMD) for C/T testing. Categorical errors regarded four Enterobacteriaceae isolates. VITEK 2 and ETEST yielded equivalent CZA and C/T susceptibility testing results, compared to the BMD method, in such a clinical context.
Invasive fungal diseases are a significant threat in immunocompromised patients, underscoring the need for rapid and accurate diagnostics. This study describes the development and validation of a real-time PCR-based laboratory-developed assay (LDA) on the Panther Fusion system for the simultaneous detection of Aspergillus fumigatus (AF) and Pneumocystis jirovecii (PJ) in bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) samples. The assay was evaluated using 239 clinical BALF samples, including cases confirmed positive for AF or PJ by reference mycological methods. Rigorous optimization ensured compatibility with the automated workflow of the Panther Fusion system, which addresses challenges such as BALF viscosity and fungal DNA recovery. No cross-reactivity with non-target fungal species was observed, and the assay demonstrated high analytical sensitivity and specificity. Only two false-negative results were reported, which could plausibly be reclassified as true negatives when interpreted alongside the serum beta-d-glucan and galactomannan assay results. For PJ detection, the assay showed excellent concordance with the OLM PneumID assay, supporting its reliability in clinical settings. The dual-target approach facilitates the simultaneous detection of both pathogens within a single workflow, improving diagnostic efficiency. The AF/PJ LDA represents a robust and scalable alternative to existing molecular assays, with the potential to enhance routine diagnostics for pulmonary fungal infections.
The diagnosis of Candida bloodstream infection (BSI) may rely on a PCR-based analysis of a positive blood culture (PBC) obtained from the patient at the time of BSI. In this study, a yeast DNA extraction protocol for use on PBCs was developed and evaluated with the molecular mouse (MM) yeast blood (YBL) chip-based PCR assay, which allowed us to detect nine medically relevant Candida species. We studied 125 simulated or clinical PBCs for Candida species. A positive correlation between the DNA concentration and colony-forming unit count was found for simulated (Spearman’s ρ = 0.58; p < 0.0001) and clinical (Spearman’s ρ = 0.23, p = 0.09) PBCs. The extracted DNA yielded positive results with the MM YBL chip assay that agreed with the Candida species-level identification results for 63 (100%) of 63 isolates from simulated PBCs and 66 (99.5%) of 67 isolates from clinical PBCs. The false-negative result was for one C. tropicalis isolate that grew together with C. albicans in PBC. None of the 30 (Candida)-negative clinical BCs included as negative controls yielded a positive result with the MM YBL chip assay. Our DNA extraction protocol for the Candida species couples efficiency and simplicity together. Nevertheless, further studies are needed before it can be adopted for use with the MM YBL chip assay.