Introduction: Thoracic epidural analgesia (TEA) and thoracic paravertebral blocks (PVB) are well-established techniques for pain management in thoracotomy. Here, we examine the efficacy of various thoracic fascial plane blocks vs TEA and PVB for intraoperative and postoperative analgesia for video assisted thoracoscopy surgery (VATS) with network meta-analysis. Methods: A search for prospective randomized control studies using adult patients undergoing VATS with general anesthesia. The interventions of interest were any regional anesthesia techniques used for postoperative pain control after VATS. Primary outcomes of interest were 24-hour opioid requirement and 24-hour pain scores. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was conducted. Results: We identified 42 studies that fulfilled our inclusion criteria. For patients who underwent VATS, TEA (MD = − 27MME, 95% CI = − 46.2 to − 9MME), ESP (MD = − 20MME, 95% CI – 33 to − 7.9MME), PVB (MD = − 15MME, 95% CI = − 26 to − 4.5MME) demonstrated significant opioid sparing efficacy, as well as reduction in cumulative 24-hour static pain scores. However, exclusion of one study due to high risk of bias revealed that TEA did not significantly reduce opioid consumption, nor did it reduce the incidence of PONV, pulmonary complications, or LOS when compared to ESP, SAP, PVB, ICN, or PECS blocks. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that TEA did not provide superior pain relief compared to ESP, SAP, PVB, ICN, or PECS blocks following VATS. Therefore, we propose ESP as a suitable intervention for the prevention of postoperative pain after VATS.

Hemophilia C is a rare bleeding disorder characterized by a deficiency in clotting factor XI (fXI) and has no standard of care for preoperative optimization before cardiac surgery. Normalization of fXI levels in patients with hemophilia C can be achieved with fresh frozen plasma (FFP), which sometimes results in allergic reactions. We present a case of a patient with hemophilia C requiring coronary artery bypass grafting surgery who developed an allergic reaction to FFP. Our report underscores the balance between thrombosis and bleeding risks when devising a perioperative plan for patients with hemophilia C.

The Ross procedure introduced a new technique for aortic valve replacement by utilizing a pulmonary autograft to replace the diseased aortic valve. This approach provides a living, dynamic valve substitute capable of growth and adaptation to systemic pressures while addressing the limitations of mechanical valves, which require lifelong anticoagulation, and bioprosthetic valves, which lack durability and growth potential. The Ross procedure offers superior hemodynamic performance and freedom from anticoagulation. While initially popular, utilization declined due to its technical complexity and concerns regarding the potential for the failure of two valves, requiring additional operations. Advances in surgical techniques, such as reinforced autografts, improved myocardial protection, and better homograft preservation, coupled with evidence of favorable long-term outcomes, have renewed interest in the procedure. Preoperative imaging with echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and computed tomography angiography ensures optimal patient selection and preparation. Intraoperatively, precise autograft harvesting, accurate implantation, and meticulous right ventricular outflow tract reconstruction are critical for success. Blood conservation techniques, such as acute normovolemic hemodilution and retrograde autologous priming, are employed to minimize transfusion-related complications. The anesthesiologist plays a critical role, including meticulous monitoring of myocardial function and hemodynamics, with intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography being essential for assessing valve integrity and ventricular function. Recent studies suggest that the Ross procedure can restore life expectancy in appropriately selected patients, reinforcing its value as a surgical option for managing aortic valve disease.

The Gerbode defect was first described in the late 1950s as a congenital peri-membranous ventricular septal defect (VSD), resulting in a left to right ventriculoatrial shunt. We present a case of a patient with restenosis of a prior bioprosthetic aortic valve (AV) who underwent reoperative AV replacement (AVR), which was complicated by a unique iatrogenic Gerbode defect with concurrent LV-LA communication. Our case highlights the unique complications resulting from ventriculoatrial shunts, with consideration paid to the management of ventriculoatrial defects described.

Cardiovascular complications of hypereosinophilic syndrome (HES) constitute a significant source of morbidity and mortality, with heart involvement found in approximately 40%–80% of patients. In patients with right heart failure due to an intracardiac mass, induction of general anesthesia poses numerous challenges. The effects of positive pressure ventilation on right ventricular (RV) physiology can quickly lead to precipitous cardiovascular collapse, which increases the importance of maintaining adequate negative pressure ventilation strategies. Current strategies involve awake femoro-femoral cannulation with partial vs full flow femoro-femoral cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), but both methods increase the risk of intraoperative blood loss due to systemic heparinization prior to sternotomy. In this case report, the authors describe an approach to anesthetizing a patient with severe right ventricular heart failure due to an intracardiac mass due to idiopathic HES. This approach involves femoral cannulation prior to induction of general anesthesia, airway topicalization, inhalational induction with fiberoptic intubation, and sternotomy with aortic/bicaval cannulation before paralysis.