Thomas Wesarg

Dr. Thomas Wesarg


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

18Years (2009-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 February 2014 in The Scientific World Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BVBart Vaerenberg
Bart Vaerenberg
CSCas Smits
Cas Smits
GCGeert De Ceulaer
Geert De Ceulaer
EZElie Zir
Elie Zir
SHSally Harman
Sally Harman
PGPaul J. Govaerts
Paul J. Govaerts
The programming of CIs is essential for good performance. However, no Good Clinical Practice guidelines exist. This paper reports on the results of an inventory of the current practice worldwide. A questionnaire was distributed to 47 CI centers. They follow 47600 recipients in 17 countries and 5 continents. The results were discussed during a debate. Sixty-two percent of the results were verified through individual interviews during the following months. Most centers (72%) participated in a cross-sectional study logging 5 consecutive fitting sessions in 5 different recipients. Data indicate that general practice starts with a single switch-on session, followed by three monthly sessions, three quarterly sessions, and then annual sessions, all containing one hour of programming and testing. The main focus lies on setting maximum and, to a lesser extent, minimum current levels per electrode. These levels are often determined on a few electrodes and then extrapolated. They are mainly based on subjective loudness perception by the CI user and, to a lesser extent, on pure tone and speech audiometry. Objective measures play a small role as indication of the global MAP profile. Other MAP parameters are rarely modified. Measurable targets are only defined for pure tone audiometry. Huge variation exists between centers on all aspects of the fitting practice.

1 October 2015 in Hearing Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SZStefan Zirn
Stefan Zirn
SASusan Arndt
Susan Arndt
AAA. Aschendorff
A. Aschendorff
TWThomas Wesarg
Thomas Wesarg

30 June 2010 in Acta Oto-Laryngologica
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
TWThomas Wesarg
Thomas Wesarg
AWArkadiusz Wasowski
Arkadiusz Wasowski
Henryk SkarzynskiHenryk Skarzynski
Henryk Skarzynski
ARAngel Ramos
Angel Ramos
JGJuan Carlos Falcon Gonzalez
Juan Carlos Falcon Gonzalez
RLRoland Laszig
Roland Laszig
Conclusion: Remote programming is a viable alternative to face-to-face programming. The procedure can be regarded as safe, time and cost saving, and clinically feasible. Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the suitability of commercially available video conferencing technology and remote control software for remote programming of sound processors in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients by assessing the feasibility, efficiency, risks, and benefits of remote programming compared to face-to-face programming. Methods: This was a randomized, prospective study. Seventy Nucleus implant recipients were recruited for a random sequence comparison of one remote and one local programming session each. The time required for local or remote programming was measured and resulting MAP T and C levels were compared. The recipient provided feedback on the local and remote programming session. The audiologist and monitoring clinician were asked for their feedback on remote programming. Results: Remote programming sessions were successfully finished for 69 recipients. No significant differences between T and C levels obtained by local and remote programming were found. The audiologists and monitoring clinicians agreed that the remote programming system provided an acceptable level of performance after most sessions. More than 50 participating recipients considered remote programming an efficient alternative to face-to-face-programming.

1 January 2009 in Cochlear Implants International
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AAAntje Aschendorff
Antje Aschendorff
WMWolfgang Maier
Wolfgang Maier
KJKatrin Jaekel
Katrin Jaekel
TWThomas Wesarg
Thomas Wesarg
SASusan Arndt
Susan Arndt
DSDirk Schulze
Dirk Schulze
The X-linked deafness syndrome is characterised by a complex labyrinth malformation with a shortened cochlea with missing bony separation between the cochlea and internal auditory canal and a deviant route of the facial nerve. Cochlear implant surgery in this malformation may be complicated by an unintended electrode insertion into the internal auditory canal. The authors report a new surgical approach: intraoperative three dimensional-volume tomography (3D-VT)-based navigation and direct intraoperative control by 3D-VT. The navigation dataset was based on intraoperative 3D-VT after performing the mastoidectomy and posterior tympanotomy. The cochleostomy was then performed under navigation control. After insertion, the electrode position was directly visualised by 3D-VT. On the basis of the reconstruction results, the electrode position was corrected and an intracochlear insertion resulted. Cochlear implantation in X-linked deafness malformation can be facilitated using intraoperative 3D-VT-assisted navigation and intraoperative 3D-VT control of the electrode position. This approach enhances the precision of navigation and reduces the risk of improper electrode placement and additional surgery in complex malformations. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

1 January 2016 in Trends in Hearing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SZStefan Zirn
Stefan Zirn
SASusan Arndt
Susan Arndt
AAAntje Aschendorff
Antje Aschendorff
RLRoland Laszig
Roland Laszig
TWThomas Wesarg
Thomas Wesarg
The ability to detect a target signal masked by noise is improved in normal-hearing listeners when interaural phase differences (IPDs) between the ear signals exist either in the masker or in the signal. To improve binaural hearing in bilaterally implanted cochlear implant (BiCI) users, a coding strategy providing the best possible access to IPD is highly desirable. In this study, we compared two coding strategies in BiCI users provided with CI systems from MED-EL (Innsbruck, Austria). The CI systems were bilaterally programmed either with the fine structure processing strategy FS4 or with the constant rate strategy high definition continuous interleaved sampling (HDCIS). Familiarization periods between 6 and 12 weeks were considered. The effect of IPD was measured in two types of experiments: (a) IPD detection thresholds with tonal signals addressing mainly one apical interaural electrode pair and (b) with speech in noise in terms of binaural speech intelligibility level differences (BILD) addressing multiple electrodes bilaterally. The results in (a) showed improved IPD detection thresholds with FS4 compared with HDCIS in four out of the seven BiCI users. In contrast, 12 BiCI users in (b) showed similar BILD with FS4 (0.6 ± 1.9 dB) and HDCIS (0.5 ± 2.0 dB). However, no correlation between results in (a) and (b) both obtained with FS4 was found. In conclusion, the degree of IPD sensitivity determined on an apical interaural electrode pair was not an indicator for BILD based on bilateral multielectrode stimulation.

1 May 2015 in Audiology and Neurotology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TWThomas Wesarg
Thomas Wesarg
NRNicole Richter
Nicole Richter
HHHorst Hessel
Horst Hessel
SGStefanie Günther
Stefanie Günther
SASusan Arndt
Susan Arndt
FHFrederike Hassepass
Frederike Hassepass
In cochlear implant (CI) recipients with unilateral hearing loss (UHL) and normal hearing (NH) in the contralateral ear, the central auditory system receives signals of different auditory modalities, i.e. electrically via the CI ear as well as acoustically via the NH ear. The present study investigates binaural integration of bimodal stimulation in the central auditory system of 10 CI subjects with UHL by applying a modified version of the Rapidly Alternating Speech Perception (RASP) test to characterise speech recognition ability under monotic and dichotic listening arrangements. Subsequently, the results for each monotic and dichotic test condition were compared to quantify the binaural benefit from CI usage. The study results demonstrate significantly improved speech recognition under dichotic compared to monotic listening conditions, providing evidence that there is binaural integration of acoustically and electrically transmitted speech segments in the central nervous system at brainstem and cortical levels. In contrast to more commonly used tests of binaural integration, such as localisation, the RASP test provides the clinical option to investigate binaural integration involving structures at the cortical level.