This study investigates the seakeeping performance of a wind power generation ship (WPG ship). This type of vessel uses rigid sails for propulsion and submerged turbines in the form of either two or four booms to generate energy. The research includes both tank tests and simulations using Ansys AQWA, validated with the new strip method (NSM). The vessel used in this study is the container ship KCS. Overall, the power generator increases the ship’s stability and reduces roll but has almost no impact on pitch. The findings show that the 4-boom configuration offers better stability and seakeeping than the 2-boom configuration. The ship’s speed has a significant impact on the ship’s RAO, especially roll and pitch, both for the bare hull and the hull with power generation equipment. When the ship’s speed increases slightly, the roll RAO tends to decrease, but as the speed becomes higher, the RAO tends to increase. Wind conditions notably increase the roll RAO peak, reducing stability, while pitch changes are minimal. The KCS model maintains operational capability in winds up to Beaufort scale 11.

Wind power generation ships (WPG ships), which combine rigid sails for propulsion and underwater turbines for onboard power generation, have attracted increasing attention as a promising concept for utilizing renewable energy at sea. This study presents an integrated assessment of a WPG ship by combining towing-tank experiments, CFD simulations using ANSYS Fluent, and theoretical analysis to evaluate the coupled performance of sails, hull, and underwater turbines. First, sail thrust and bare-hull resistance were quantified to identify the effective operating-speed range under Beaufort 6–8 wind conditions, and the optimal number of rigid sails was determined. Based on a thrust–resistance balance at a representative rated operating point, two turbine configurations (two and four turbines) were preliminarily sized. The results show that ten rigid sails can provide near-maximum thrust without excessive aerodynamic interference, and the installation of turbines significantly reduces the feasible operating range compared to the bare-hull case. For the two-turbine configuration, a common effective ship-speed range of 6.58–8.0 m/s is obtained, whereas the four-turbine configuration is restricted to 6.58–7.44 m/s due to wake losses, additional appendage drag, and near-free-surface effects. The four-turbine configuration exhibits approximately 30% lower total power output than the two-turbine configuration. These findings demonstrate that an integrated, system-level evaluation is essential for WPG ship design and indicate that the two-turbine configuration offers a more favorable balance between power generation capability and operational flexibility.