Context: This narrative review article explores research integrity and the implications of scholarly work in medical education. The paper describes how the current landscape of medical education emphasizes research and scholarly activity for medical students, resident physicians, and faculty physician educators. There is a gap in the existing literature that fully explores research integrity, the challenges surrounding the significant pressure to perform scholarly activity, and the potential for ethical lapses by those involved in medical education. Objectives: The objectives of this review article are to provide a background on authorship and publication safeguards, outline common types of research misconduct, describe the implications of publication in medical education, discuss the consequences of ethical breaches, and outline possible solutions to promote research integrity in academic medicine. Methods: To complete this narrative review, the authors explored the current literature utilizing multiple databases beginning in June of 2021, and they completed the literature review in January of 2023. To capture the wide scope of the review, numerous searches were performed. A number of Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms were utilized to identify relevant articles. The MeSH terms included “scientific misconduct,” “research misconduct,” “authorship,” “plagiarism,” “biomedical research/ethics,” “faculty, medical,” “fellowships and scholarships,” and “internship and residency.” Additional references were accessed to include medical school and residency accreditation standards, residency match statistics, regulatory guidelines, and standard definitions. Results: Within the realm of academic medicine, research misconduct and misrepresentation continue to occur without clear solutions. There is a wide range of severity in breaches of research integrity, ranging from minor infractions to fraud. Throughout the medical education system in the United States, there is pressure to publish research and scholarly work. Higher rates of publications are associated with a successful residency match for students and academic promotion for faculty physicians. For those who participate in research misconduct, there is a multitude of potential adverse consequences. Potential solutions to ensure research integrity exist but are not without barriers to implementation. Conclusions: Pressure in the world of academic medicine to publish contributes to the potential for research misconduct and authorship misrepresentation. Lapses in research integrity can result in a wide range of potentially adverse consequences for the offender, their institution, the scientific community, and the public. If adopted, universal research integrity policies and procedures could make major strides in eliminating research misconduct in the realm of academic medicine.

Braille is often proposed by the uninformed as the optimal solution to providing an alternative to visual information to the visually impaired. The purpose of this article is to highlight the complexity of the braille user population and discuss the importance of understanding the use of braille as a solution for equal access of information. As part of the National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx) Tech program and its goal to make home tests accessible to people with disabilities, a series of interviews with industry experts was conducted to better understand braille technologies and the braille user space. Published literature findings provided additional context and support to these interviews. It was found that expert consensus and data from published literature vary. The braille user population is complex and lacks consistent characterization. Visually printed media should not be solely relied on to communicate information. In conclusion, braille is one solution for improving access to information. Understanding the unique needs of braille users and how they engage with information in a world that is heavily reliant on visual content, is a critical step in developing and implementing non-visual alternatives that will collectively address information access.

The study objective was to describe the implementation and results of a postoperative telemedicine program for adult cardiac surgery, including a clinical study and an organic postoperative telemedicine program aimed at reducing readmission rates and barriers to care. Patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting consented to enrollment in our Perfect Care study funded by The Duke Endowment including advanced practice provider–led postdischarge telemedicine services with data collection. There were 2 telemedicine visits at days 3 and 10 postdischarge using a live face-to-face video platform. Patients were provided with home wearables for heart rate monitoring, blood pressure cuffs, and scales. The success of the Perfect Care study led to the formation of our organic program, the Tele Heart Care, which was adapted to include a larger patient population while remaining structurally similar. Fifty patients were enrolled prospectively between January and October 2021 in Perfect Care. The 30-day readmission rates for those enrolled was 4% compared with a 16% readmission rate for nonenrolled patients during this period. Furthermore, 36% of enrolled patients received medication modifications to optimize blood pressure, heart rate and rhythm, and fluid-volume status, or to treat infectious symptoms. Tele Heart Care enrolled 203 patients and was associated with a decrease in 30-day readmission rates in all cardiac surgery patients at our institution from 24% to 4% over a 6-month period. An advanced practice provider–led postdischarge telemedicine program after cardiac surgery can reduce hospital readmission and barriers to care, and improve patient satisfaction. With involvement of multiple stakeholders, a successful program can be launched despite the present state of national health system finances with limited human capital and constrained access to monitoring equipment.

Cardiac arrest remains a leading cause of death worldwide and is a global health crisis. First described in the medical literature in the 18th century, modern cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) with closed chest compressions has remained the standard of care since 1960. Despite exponential advances in basic science research and technological innovations, cardiac arrest survival remains a dismal 10%. The standard of care closed chest compressions provide only 20–30% of baseline cardiac output to the body. Have modern therapies plateaued in effectiveness? This article reviews the history of cardiac arrest, its therapies, and opportunities for future treatments. Through an exploration into the history of CPR and breakthroughs in its treatment paradigms, modern-day researchers and providers may find further inspiration to combat the cardiac arrest public health crisis.

Background: Over-the-counter (OTC) diagnostic testing is on the rise with many in vitro diagnostic tests being lateral flow assays (LFAs). A growing number of these are adopting reader technologies, which provides an alternative to visual readouts for results interpretation, allowing for improved accessibility of OTC diagnostics. As the reader technology market develops, there are many technologies entering the market, but no clear, single solution has yet been identified. The purpose of this research is to identify and discuss important parameters for the assessment of LFA reader technologies for consideration by manufacturers or researchers. Methods: As part of The National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering's Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx) Tech program, reader manufacturers were interviewed to investigate the current state of reader technology development through several parameters identified as important industry standards. Readers were categorized by technology type and parameters including cost, detection method, multiplex capabilities, assay type, maturity, and use case were all assessed. Results: Fifteen reader manufacturers were identified and interviewed, and information on a total of 19 technologies was assessed. Reader technology type was found to be predictive of other attributes, whether the reader is smart technology only, a standalone reader, a reader with smart technology required, or a reader with smart technology optional. Conclusions: Pairing reader technology with OTC diagnostic tests is important for improving existing COVID-19 tests and can be utilized in other diagnostics as the OTC use case grows in popularity. Reader technology type, which is predictive of core reader attributes, should be considered when selecting a reader technology for a specific LFA test within the context of regulatory guidance. As diagnostics increase in complexity, readers provide solutions to accessibility challenges, facilitate public health reporting, and ease the transition to multiplex testing, therefore increasing market availability.

The National Institutes of Health's Rapid Acceleration of Diagnostics (RADx) program answered the call to accelerate the development of point-of-care (POC) and over-the-counter (OTC) COVID-19 tests. The widespread availability and access to self-tests has increased the public's familiarity and acceptance of at-home diagnostics. This paper examines the current state of OTC diagnostic testing, discusses potential applications of OTC testing, and highlights the implications of widespread OTC testing for clinical medicine.