Although the World Heritage Sustainable Tourism Programme has great potential for addressing the Sustainable Development Goals, it faces a continual lack of on-the-ground community-level tools. This paper explores the potential for community-level intervention to guide the evolution of rural landscapes under the World Heritage Sustainable Tourism Programme. This community-level intervention comprises three phases (knowledge coproduction, perspective planning and community action) and nine stages (village representative assembly, internalising knowledge workshop, field trip and casual interviews, knowledge demonstration, joint fieldwork, perspective discussions, tangible landscape element design, intangible landscape element coordination, and effectiveness evaluation). Our case study, Dragon Tail Village, reveals that community-level interveners should facilitate community development by recognising the important role of rural communities—co-owners of heritage sites—and rural landscapes—sets of attributes with heritage value. Our findings therefore improve the understanding of the World Heritage Sustainable Tourism Programme’s driving rationale for community development.

The purpose of this study was to analyze ‘sharing’ as an operational framework for waterfront industrial heritage revitalization in the context of sustainable urban regeneration. This research study was conducted to better understand the public accessibility of heritage preservation projects in a densely populated waterfront urban area and to determine to what extent heritage could be made available to the general public. We examined the development of industrial heritage along Suzhou Creek, Shanghai, and its process of regeneration. The focus area covered a waterway stretch of 19.2 km and an adjacent land area of 11.7 km² managed as a single planning entity on both sides of the creek. We analyzed the present preservation practices and discovered a growing desire to increase the historical buildings’ visibility in the context of urban regeneration. We argue that ‘sharing’ can serve as a pivotal framework for sustainable waterfront regeneration, as its implementation can (1) increase the public value of waterfront heritage and (2) incorporate comprehensive objectives, design strategies, evaluation methods, and public participation into the space revitalization process.

With the rise of the sharing economy and the concept of the sharing city, the field of urban renewal is facing new opportunities and challenges. This paper innovatively explores built heritage renewal in central Shanghai from the perspective of the sharing economy, focusing on the evolution of plot morphology and associated design strategies. Six representative cases, selected within the framework of three urban renewal policies from 1999 to the present, are analyzed using a diachronic method based on the Conzen school and the street frontage index. Combined with historical maps, aerial photographs, and satellite images, the paper analyzes the changes in plot morphology from 1999 to 2024. The paper highlights how the introduction of sharing city principles significantly impacted plot morphology, facilitating the expansion and diversification of space use and driving the restructuring of plot boundaries, including physical, property, and activity boundaries. The study further reveals how the shared city concept has led to the emergence of privately owned public spaces. Additionally, the paper discusses the pursuit of flow, openness, and sharing in urban renewal, noting how these factors have shifted the focus from purely rentable and sellable areas to more efficient space resource allocation, optimizing spatial configurations. Finally, the paper introduces the concept of “sharing by transfer”, proposing that adjustments to plot boundaries under the sharing economy framework can foster more equitable, efficient, and sustainable urban renewal, providing new perspectives and strategic recommendations for built heritage renewal.

Against the backdrop of rapid global urbanization, peri-urban villages universally face the dual dilemmas of landscape homogenization and the imbalance between heritage preservation and functional renewal. As a typical representative, the “Shanghai-style Jiangnan” villages feature an open water–land chessboard pattern and linear water-house parallel organization, which are distinctly different from the closed and introverted texture of traditional Suzhou-Hangzhou water towns. Such villages urgently need to balance the continuation of the original spatial fabric and the adaptation of modern functions. Existing studies on rural landscapes mostly focus on the static vertical identification of single elements, lacking a systematic quantitative analysis of the horizontal topological relationships among multiple elements, making it difficult to accurately define the spatial boundaries between preservation and renewal. This study takes Xinyuan Village in Jinshan District, Shanghai, as an empirical subject to construct a model for the vertical gene decoding of the “Point-Line-Network” and horizontal topology coupling of “Surface Gene.” By introducing a landscape sensitivity assessment combined with the Entropy Weight Method (EWM) and GIS (Geographic Information System) spatial Kernel Density Estimation (KDE), a quantifiable landscape control heat map is generated. The study identifies the nested original fabric structure of the “house-water-field-forest-road” and the spatial landscape differentiation characteristics in Xinyuan Village and delineates three-tier differentiated zoning controls through dual-verified heat maps. Validated based on Xinyuan Village, this method effectively resolves the conflict between rural preservation and renewal and realizes the transformation from static museum-style preservation to refined adaptive zoning. It provides specific practical strategies for the renewal of “Shanghai-style Jiangnan” villages and offers a quantitative morphological reference for enhancing the spatial resilience and living heritage of peri-urban villages, while its cross-regional transferability needs further verification.