Petrus Christiaan Pistorius

Prof. Petrus Christiaan Pistorius

Carnegie Mellon University
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in International Journal of Fatigue
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMing Tang
Ming Tang
Petrus Christiaan PistoriusPetrus Christiaan Pistorius
Petrus Christiaan Pistorius

1 January 1993 in Corrosion Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GBG.T. Burstein
G.T. Burstein
Petrus Christiaan PistoriusPetrus Christiaan Pistorius
Petrus Christiaan Pistorius
SMS.P. Mattin
S.P. Mattin

1 March 2017 in Additive Manufacturing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MTMing Tang
Ming Tang
Petrus Christiaan PistoriusPetrus Christiaan Pistorius
Petrus Christiaan Pistorius
JBJack L. Beuth
Jack L. Beuth

1 October 2017 in Engineering
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PPPatcharapit Promoppatum
Patcharapit Promoppatum
SYShi-Chune Yao
Shi-Chune Yao
Petrus Christiaan PistoriusPetrus Christiaan Pistorius
Petrus Christiaan Pistorius
ARAnthony D. Rollett
Anthony D. Rollett
The finite-element (FE) model and the Rosenthal equation are used to study the thermal and microstructural phenomena in the laser powder-bed fusion of Inconel 718. A primary aim is to comprehend the advantages and disadvantages of the Rosenthal equation (which provides an analytical alternative to FE analysis), and to investigate the influence of underlying assumptions on estimated results. Various physical characteristics are compared among the FE model, Rosenthal equation, and experiments. The predicted melt pool shapes compared with reported experimental results from the literature show that both the FE model and the analytical (Rosenthal) equation provide a reasonably accurate estimation. At high heat input, under conditions leading to keyholing, the reported melt width is narrower than predicted by the analytical equation. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis based on choices of the absorptivity is performed, which shows that the Rosenthal approach is more sensitive to absorptivity, compared with the FE approach. The primary reason could be the effect of radiative and convective losses, which are assumed to be negligible in the Rosenthal equation. In addition, both methods predict a columnar solidification microstructure, which agrees well with experimental reports, and the primary dendrite arm spacing (PDAS) predicted with the two approaches is comparable with measurements

4 January 2016 in JOM
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMing Tang
Ming Tang
Petrus Christiaan PistoriusPetrus Christiaan Pistorius
Petrus Christiaan Pistorius
SNSneha Narra
Sneha Narra
JBJack L. Beuth
Jack L. Beuth

1 March 1994 in Corrosion Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Petrus Christiaan PistoriusPetrus Christiaan Pistorius
Petrus Christiaan Pistorius
GBG.T. Burstein
G.T. Burstein