Oral diseases represent a significant global health and economic burden, necessitating the development of effective diagnostic tools. This study investigates the volatile organic compound (VOC) profiles of bacteria associated with dental caries and periodontal disease to explore their potential as diagnostic biomarkers. Four microbial strains—Streptococcus mutans (700610), Streptococcus sanguis (NCO 2863), Porphyromonas gingivalis (ATCC 33277), and Fusobacterium nucleatum (PK1594)—were cultured (N = 24), alongside intraoral samples (N = 60), from individuals with common oral diseases. Headspace VOCs were analyzed using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), and statistical analyses were conducted by applying non-parametric Wilcoxon and Kruskal–Wallis tests. VOC identification was performed using the NIST14 database. Strain-specific VOC signatures were identified, with P. gingivalis and F. nucleatum exhibiting distinct profiles from each other and from Streptococcus strains. Comparative analysis of disease cohorts revealed statistically significant differences at multiple retention times between caries, gingivitis, and periodontitis. These findings suggest that VOC profiling enables differentiation between bacterial strains and disease phenotypes, supporting their potential application as diagnostic biomarkers for oral diseases. This study establishes a foundational framework for VOC-based diagnostic methodologies in dental pathology.
1 January 2025 in The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics
Diagnostic limitations contribute to variability in clinical decision-making, highlighting the need for objective diagnostic tools. Biomarker-based approaches enable detection of subclinical pathological changes and may improve diagnostic accuracy. Exhaled breath contains volatile organic compounds (VOCs) that reflect host and microbial metabolic activity and therefore represent a promising non-invasive diagnostic medium. This study evaluated the feasibility of a nanosensor array outputs to classify caries, gingivitis, periodontitis, and peri-implantitis using breath VOC profiles. A priori power analysis (η²=0.02) yielded 346 participants across five oral phenotypes. Exhaled VOCs were analyzed via GC-MS, with a subset assessed using a 40-sensor nanoarray. VOCs were age-adjusted (residual regression), filtered (≥50% presence; 47 compounds), log-transformed, and tested (Kruskal-Wallis, Bonferroni αadj=0.0167). Nanoarray data underwent Principal Component Analysis (PCA) (15 factors; αadj=0.01), Canonical Discriminant Analysis (CDA), and supervised Machine Learning (ML) (80:20 split). GC-MS identified one significant VOC (RT≈2.81 min) differentiating periodontitis from caries (p=0.006) and gingivitis (p=0.043), while 13 VOCs distinguished implant groups (p<0.05). Nanoarray CDA showed two significant functions (Wilks' Λ=0.1697, p<0.0001; 87.64% variance). A 10-sensor ML model achieved 69.6% training and 58.8% validation accuracy. Validation sensitivities were polarized (100% periodontitis/healthy implants; 25-50% others), with high specificities (0.714-1.000) and ROC-AUC (0.88-0.97). Although validation performance across all disease categories remained variable, and discriminatory capacity was limited for early dysbiotic and non-inflammatory conditions, the predictive models demonstrated strong classification accuracy for inflammatory phenotypes, particularly periodontitis and implant-related states. These findings highlight both the promise of volatilomic diagnostics and the current limitations imposed by sample size, biological variability, and metabolic overlap, particularly in early disease stages. Nevertheless, the strong performance observed in inflammatory conditions underscores the potential clinical utility of this platform as a non-invasive adjunct for disease detection and monitoring. Continued advancements in sensor technologies and machine learning methodologies are likely to enhance model robustness and generalizability, facilitating translation into clinical practice.